Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is exactly why I am enjoyimg my 50th year watching Sport since The 1960 Grand National and 1961 Cup Final.


3 Hours 57 Minutes that enthralled, enraptured and enthused all who ran through the whole gamut of emotions with Andy.


Here's too the next round...>:D<

*Bob* Wrote:

He's got a foul mouth on him. I saw him shout 'c*nt' at least three times. Soap and water, Murray, soap and water.


No! "Our" Andy actually said "You Can't" its short for "You Can NOT be serious" as I understand a former Tennis Star used to say....

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Perhaps he is from Kent after all.



Soon will be.


If you had perused his kit bag really closely you would have seen a brochure extolling the virtues of Chatham Docks where my informants tell me he is hoping to put down a deposit on a nearby residence....

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> he's just bought a gaff in Surrey with his

> girlfriend Tony

>

> Thats a co-incidence ???? !!!!


My name is Tony, as well....please yourself....

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are women really attracted by money?


Well, sweeping generalisation, but stereotypically men are thought to be more interested in what a woman looks like (young and fit = good mother), women more interested in how powerful / wealthy a man is (good provider for the family).


I can't say I have ever gone out with guy for his money and I am sure there are plenty of other women who are not motivated by money... but I guess the stereotype might have some element of truth about it! I mean, look at the women who seem to be obsessed with what the WAGS lifestyle is like - famous only for spending their footballer husband's money in most cases!

Think you missed a bit Indie


Men like women who are: young and fit = [good for sex for 5 years and then] = good mother.


Think some women like the glamourous WAGS lifestyle - but think most women take as they find and if they love the man and his personality they will stick with him unless he turns out to be a complete loser.

You see, thats me always giving women the benefit of the doubt...

Mick Mac Wrote:

Are women really attracted by money?


Do bears do poo-poohs in the woods? :))


Reading between the lines I got put in my place very recently.


By complete accident I met up, in October 2008 with someone who went off 33 years ago, in 1976, "with someone much older" when I was seeing her "on and off".


We have met frequently since that incredible fluke that we met up again ( I won't bore you with the details but it was 1,000-1 shot--spooky if you believe in "fate") ...anyway the Guy has died and left her a massive Detached House in Hampshire to add to the even bigger detached house that I visited last week in Park Langley, Bromley which was left to her by her Parents.


We went to that Docklands Show on the water and then she slipped in the magic phrase "Anyone who settles down with someone who is NOT in the same financial situation as themselves is mad...." lol...I can take a hint...:))

Sweeping generalisations always miss a lot, and my comments were tongue in cheek about both sexes. I don't think I have ever known a friend of mine reject a guy for not being a good earner though I have known the odd or two who really do expect a guy to always pay on dates which seems a bit old fashioned to me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...