Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Alan dear boy. I feared you had left us in grief over the dearly departed Silver Buckle. Any more news? Are you part of this Camberwell Republic in the BBC Bias thread causing me great stress over the possible loss of my home?


Maggie would never stand for such.

Hello dear chap. I understand there is a new French bistro in Camberwell but have been unable to go out recently. Is it worth a visit?


Maggie was always invited to our Camberwell Society dinners back in the day. She was never able to attend, but always sent through a delightful note of apology.


A former PM did dine at my home many, many years ago. I still have the photo on proud display.

Alan Dale Wrote:


Road (car, motorbike, bicycle, coach), air (scheduled airlines, private airlines, helicopter), canals, by foot.


Hardly homogenous products are they?


That's why it costs ?85.


AD - you misunderstand the nature of the competition - the service you wanted was one that facilitated travel. The mode is irrelevant - all the examples I quoted will get an individual, or many individuals, from A to B. They do it in varying degrees of comfort, speed, convenience and cost - and therefore compete in the market of transport from A to B.

AD


You choose an appropriate example.


National Express has not been able to attract enough revenue paying customers to its line. You obviously object to the ?85.00 fare and it seems so do many others. As a result the East Coast Line business has failed - which is what happens in free markets. The government, being fond of intervention and having propped up a daft model** for private railways, will take it over.


The traveling public would be better served if National Express had to find a buyer in a poor market - then a capitalist predator could buy it up cheap and, from that low cost base, set about delivering a more cost effective service, unburdened by high debt and a contract to pay huge chunks of money to government.


National Express will also soon be free to set up a coach line offering, say, ?5.00 fares. If more people value low prices over comfort and speed then the Government run East Coast line will continue to wither.


** The commercial failure of The East Coast Line and National Express was, at least, partly the function of the high cost they contracted to pay the Government for the franchise. If the government had negotiated, as requested, a lower franchise fee NE would still be in charge. Better still would have been to have held the franchise auction in a completely open market and not the government rigged market that prevailed three years ago.

AD - recognised. MBA 101.


I still contend that the market is "travel" not "trains". Trains are a particular subset - they meet some of your criteria, but not all.


There are many, potential, buyers. There are fewer suppliers.


They have high entry costs but low (relative) exit costs


There is good information on prices, times and services (never ever gonig to be perfect)


Firms aim to maximise profits - this they could do better if not burdened by state interference.


Homogenous products - well they can all get you from A to B - which is pretty homogenous. Fruit & veg all supply food - but different varieties of food, the consumer decides whether they want carrots or aubergines today.

AuraCaught Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I will say nothing, but will attach the following,

> which I signed months ago.

>

> http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/thatchfuneral/


I see that 12,968 have so far signed the petition.


If a Counter petition is raised I would hazard a guess that 112,968 would have signed by now...:)

AuraCaught Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm glad to say that the three counter-petitions

> have 113 signatures >:D<


LOL..Just prooves what I've always believed that "our" Margeret appealled to The Silent Majority...:)

AuraCaught Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I will say nothing, but will attach the following,

> which I signed months ago.

>

> http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/thatchfuneral/


Just signed it. Thanks.

I'm with Marmora Man on this one.


The market is travel not trains.


The price issue is slightly spurious. No-one's making a profit by running trains in a classic sense, it's just a question of what proportion of the fare is paid by the traveller and what proportion is paid by the tax payer.


For those train companies getting more cash in than they're paying out to run the service, it's only because the tax payer paid for the infrastructure years ago.


I still despair, because I believe 'private' travel is a luxury of a world with fewer people and more resources, not the 21st century. It would give me great succour if the bloody train services would set a reasonable example.


I blame Thatcher. She privatised them, the old fraud.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...