Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As a result of the campaign against the rail service cuts, London Travel Watch, the official passenger watchdog, have commissioned The Railway Consultancy to do a Passenger Survey of users of the South London Line (the service between London Bridge and Victoria via Peckham Rye and Denmark Hill) and the Dartford ? Victoria service via Peckham Rye and Denmark Hill. We were expecting to be able to comment on the wording but they did the survey without notice on Thursday. However our protests at the lack of information have prompted them to reopen their online survey, which was closed after one day. Please pass this info. on to any other rail users you know.


If you use these rail services, please go to http://www.railcons.castavote.co.uk and follow the instructions to get your survey number to be able to complete the survey card questions. This is what it says:

__________________________________________________________

If you do not have your survey card to hand and therefore do not have a survey number to enter, please email mailto:[email protected] stating whether you use:

* Southern services between London Bridge and Victoria

* Southeastern services between Victoria and Dartford

* Both of the above

* Clapham North underground

A new survey number will be emailed to you.

Thank you

On behalf of London Travelwatch

_________________________________________________________


if you have had a survey card on the train, and you have any feedback on it or on how it was being conducted or received, please post comments here.

Sakwhita - use the instructions above and email the info address to get a survey number.


Eileen - a one day survey when few people know the risk to the service. That's one way of ensuring being able to report a low level of interest I guess! I've asked for my number and will fill it in asap!

Applespider Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sakwhita - use the instructions above and email

> the info address to get a survey number.

>

> Eileen - a one day survey when few people know the

> risk to the service. That's one way of ensuring

> being able to report a low level of interest I

> guess! I've asked for my number and will fill it

> in asap!


Yes you are right. We were astonished, shocked actiually, as we met London Travel Watch just two days earlier and were promised info in advance on the survey so we could alert people. Then we heard about it actually happening by people posting on this Forum. Very disappointing to put it mildly. The survey is happening only because we said that there needed to be a survey of users and their demand for the line, as all the plans to close it have been on the basis of guesswork. And the wording in the survey card is unlikely to have alerted rail users, who haven?t been aware of the issues before now, to the importance of responding. The online survey is now continuing as we protested about the lack of information. But it doesn't get to the rail users not reading this Forum or not on the SRUG email list.

I got given a card on Thursday at the station, and entered with my survey number online.


Feel I ought to follow up a couple of points made here?


To give out the cards without any publicity does at least mean the cards go to people who are on the train that day so they may be able to cross check with some other boarding figures about how many people got on or off trains about the actual usage that day - the main questions on the card were about where you were travelling from and to. If you?d handed out the cards on more than one day then you might get people entering a couple of times which wouldn?t be wise. Quite how many percent of those people on trains that day who will respond is another matter, one for the surveyors to work out.


June isn?t the best of times to do a survey, as it?s at the start of the holiday season, but I guess Travelwatch have had to move fast to get the surveys commissioned and to have waited a little longer and you?d have been getting into July with many more people going away etc


I suppose they?ll have to separate out the people who apply now in any analysis.

I'd agree except that I got on a train to Victoria on Thursday morning from Denmark Hill at around 8.15am and didn't get a card at the station or on a train so how many were they handing out and at what times. I've had my survey code and filled it in accordingly. I filled in one for my trip into London and one for the trip back.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...