Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good win at Ascot today and back to 3972. Two

> years now since I put on ?30 and it has been

> rolling ever since, with a few hiccups.

>

> Liverpool for the league at 33s looks good too.


Are you saying Mick you've never added to your original investment (apart from winnings)?

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Good win at Ascot today and back to 3972. Two

> > years now since I put on ?30 and it has been

> > rolling ever since, with a few hiccups.

> >

> > Liverpool for the league at 33s looks good too.

>

> Are you saying Mick you've never added to your

> original investment (apart from winnings)?


Yes nothing in and nothing out for 2 years. Pretty good eh :)

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Also had a punt on the PO flotation as it looks

> like a no brainer......I expect my lefty mates

> will be livid but i don't think they read this bit

> much :)


I did it too. Waiting to see the level of scaleback. Not sure its a betting matter but thats up for debate.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Also had a punt on the PO flotation as it looks

> like a no brainer......I expect my lefty mates

> will be livid but i don't think they read this bit

> much :)

I hope you were not too greedy Quids.


The Telegraph understands that plans being drawn up in Whitehall could see those who applied for tens of thousands of pounds worth of shares excluded from the stock market flotation next week. They will be told of the decision tomorrow.

It had previously been thought that all investors who applied for shares would be granted some stock - although it is now expected that tens of thousands of more wealthy investors will be snubbed.

The exact "cut-off" point will be decided today, but is likely to be those who applied for more than between ?40,000 and ?50,000 worth of shares. It may be set as low as ?10,000.

Others may receive fewer shares than they had hoped.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No, not won an accie yet but using the free bet on

> reasonable bankers so below the Accies minimum 2/1

> odds, if I win an average odds Accies I,ll be

> about even this weekend if I win say 4 over the

> season and my free bets got to odds then I,ll make

> a profit...depends a bit on my free

> bets...ivevbeen backing spurs a lot so won a bit

> at ok odds, man city at home don,t return much!


I still keep hearing this offer of a 'free' bet on the radio. How are you doing ????'s?

Still not hit an accie : (, but I've missed a few weekends and the've still offered me a free bet anyway...free bets I am below odds...so poor betting is not allowing me to see if there are any catches for winners!


In other news, 66/1 on a 5-0 whitewash after the first test is looking nice!


Horses - anyone got any views on the King George?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Looking for 3 or 4        25x50mm roof battens for a DIY project
    • By Vladi's argument no-one in Britain should ever complain about anything at all because there are always other people suffering more than we are somewhere in the world. Perhaps its just me, but when I waited 12 hours in Kings A and E with a heart attack  the thought that I'm lucky to have an NHS wasn't much comfort at 3.00am in a hard plastic chair. Sorry, Vladi, try to remember your argument next time your train's cancelled or you wait 12 hours in A and E. Sometimes complaint is the only way to effect change.
    • That because I work in transport.  As I work in transport I know quite a lot about it.  Not everything.  But a lot.  And I know people who can also tell me what is going on.  And I have this massive resource of information at my finger tips.  Called the internet.  So I try to base my views on real information rather than perception.  Rather than what somebody told me down the pub, or on X, or on Nextdoor.com, or someone interviewed in the street by the BBC, or the Daily Mail, or UnHerd.com, or a Jeremy Vine programme.  I can't comment on LBC and only once spent five minutes on GB news.  And I don't automatically believe everything in the Guardian, Radio 4 comedy, Have I Got News for You or Led by Donkeys even if the politics often aligns with mine It's just lazy to go straight to the stereo types about national and local government, and insulting to label most public and civil servants viewing them as biased, incompetent or ignorant (and the 'I know better'). And with the opportunity to ask questions through the official channels why so many instantaneously resort to social media rather than trying probing themselves.
    • As well as the above, has anyone else noticed the massive amounts of gum being spat out all over as well as marking pavements? This is not only disgusting as gum will be laced with human germs and saliva but also places a large cleaning cost on already stretched services. Why do humans insist on spitting out gum onto the pavements? Why can't they dispose of it in a bin or take it home?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...