Jump to content

Recommended Posts

MissusF Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just to make a point already made: these roadworks

> are really really dangerous.

>

> I saw a little girl yesterday almost get hit by a

> car coming around the corner too fast. Was pretty

> frightening. A tragedy narrowly missed.



I'm not sure this is due to the roadworks, though they probably don't help.


I have been noticing driving round here recently - most lately whilst waiting for a bus outside the old police station.


Cars just take the most incredibly stupid risks, driving from side roads onto Lordship Lane really fast without waiting for a proper gap in the traffic, and scarcely missing vehicles on the main road.


I'm amazed there haven't been more accidents.

Sue, I agree, though multiple roadworks in the area is surely contributing to driver frustration?


If we total all the money being spent on works, studies, redesign, allocation of funds from CGS- wouldn't that money be better spent funding a few cops to stop speeding cars and issue tickets? Word tends to get around that proper penalties are on the cards.


Have you looked at the quality of workmanship on Nx? Badly laid and stone cut to go around existing lights looks like jigsaw- perhaps measurements were also miscalculated, along with everything else.

We definitely need more traffic Police - they've been drastically cut over the last 20 years.

But each Police officers costs around ?60k. So all the road works, studies etc. in East Dulwich ward would pay for one officer without a car for one year.


We have provided the tools to measure speed etc. for our local Police officers.

I would love to see more traffic police targeting speeding and dangerous drivers. Instead we just get humps and road closures.


Couldn't agree more. It's a vicious circle. The more traffic calming measures there are, the more frustrated a certain type of driver gets and it's those drivers who aim to drive in a responsible way who take the brunt of that. I'm not saying we shouldn't have traffic calming, but there really needs to be some focus on the other aspects which make our roads unsafe as well.

One police officer could manage and oversee a number of community wardens who might be tasked with monitoring speed and car regs. this might be a better use of wardens who whizz around on scooters and lurk in camera cars for hours on end with the sole aim to catch out cars with a bumper one inch over double yellows.


What is the cost of the parking wardens and the camera cars?


BTW James, on the issue of double yellows you still have not come back to me about whether you supported increasing double yellow on Chesterfield Grove, April 10th 2014?!!!!!

Hi first Mate,

But we didn't have any Dulwich Community Council meeting 10 April 2014. If I ever agree to any double yellow lines I would have insisted on at least an equal removal of parking restrictions somewhere else. That's been my colleague and my policy for eons. But we only get to agree things such as double yellow lines at a community council as as their wasn't one I'm mystified what you're trying to get at.


Parking wardens are more than self funding. The parking enforcement service runs a large surplus.


I'm not clear what Community Wardens an extra police officer would manage? The current limited number of community wardens the council has are almost exclusively limited to crime hot spots in the Peckham, Camberwell and close to London Bridge.

James,


re the double yellows on Chesterfield, I am quoting the date you were consulted on this, that is the 10th April 2014. We know you were consulted on that date because that information is given in an email addressed to you from Southwark Council, that you chose to publish on this forum. It matters not if it was a DCC or some other means, all we know for sure is that you were consulted on that date.


So, again, and I will keep asking, all I want to know is did you say "yes" to extended doubles on Chesterfield or did you say "no"?


I am interested in your assertion about the busy wardens. I often see them around, parked up for lengthy periods in and around Lordhsip, monitoring life from the camera car, and others out on their scooters are never, it seems, too busy to miss dropping in on the carwash on the corner of LL for a "friendly" chat with the guys there.


Yes, all that money from parking funds the good labours of the wardens but, a surplus you say? How about putting some of that money, or indeed all of it, to funding a police officer and wardens, dedicated to the speeding issue. A simple solution and one that might help us avoid digging up yet more roads to no avail or, heaven forfend, blocking them off completely.

> If I ever agree to any double yellow lines I would have insisted on at least an equal removal of parking restrictions somewhere else


Does this also apply when you ASK for double yellow lines outside 32-34 Melbourne Grove?


John K

Hi first mate,

I receive around a 100 councillor emails a day. So I don't recall the email.

Could you narrow it down to a time so I can retrieve it more easily please?


Hi edhistry,

I haven't asked for double yellow lines outside 32-34 Melbourne Grove.

I've asked what officers would recommend to solve the problem of disabled residents at these two homes being able to be collected and dropped-off to attend day care centres. The traditional disabled parking bays wouldn't seem appropriate as these residents can't drive. Double yellow lines would preclude anyone parking - including the minibuses that collect them. If you have any suggestions that would be helpful.

Or do you think I should ignore the plight of these dozen disabled people?

Melbourne Grove

6. Councillor Barber contacted the parking design team to request that a parking

facility be introduced near the residential care homes of Nos. 34 and 36

Melbourne Grove.


It was "near to", and not "outside", sorry.

Hi James, look up around 10 April 2014, the date S'wark state you were consulted about double yellows on Chesterfield? Don't think I can be any more precise. i'd imagine an email search on that date with the keywords Chesterfield and double yellows might be fruitful? However you know more about IT and technology than me I am sure, so apologies if I am teaching granny to suck eggs.


Please see below the email to you last month which states the date you were consulted about "new lengths of double yellows" on Chesterfield. Note the penultimate paragraph.


I cannot think that you would require any more detail in order to respond to the very simple question, did you say "yes" or " no" to new "lengths of restrictions" that js, double yellow lines, when consulted on the matter on 10 April 2014?


You seem to have omitted the name of the person that sent you the email below, but I am sure they could find your response when consulted on that date, that is 10 April 2014, were you to ask?



Our Reference: 551054

________________________________________



Dear Councillor Barber


Thank you for your enquiry dated 12th August 2015, in which you requested information regarding yellow lines in the East Dulwich ward. I believe you are referring to the recent making and publication of a 'consolidation order'.


The traffic order which has been advertised is known as a 'consolidation order' which is exactly this -a consolidation of existing traffic orders to ensure these remain manageable and easy to follow. This London Borough of Southwark (Waiting and loading restrictions) Consolidation Order 2015(1) ('the 2015 Order') consolidates the London Borough of Southwark (Waiting and loading restrictions) Consolidation Order 2012(2) ('the 2012 Order') together with the 60 subsequent amendment orders amending the provisions of the 2012 Order.

It is deemed best practice (e.g. in guidelines issued by the British Parking Association) for local authorities undertaking decriminalised parking enforcement to regularly consolidate and maintain the traffic orders forming a basis for that enforcement.

This follows the Consolidation Order process laid out in Regulation 21 of the Local Authorities? Traffic Orders (Procedure) (England and Wales) Regulations 1996 (Statutory Instrument 1996 No. 2489).

There are no new restrictions being introduced by way of this consolidation order.

The yellow lines you have specifically queried at Ashbourne and Chesterfield and Melbourne Grove were originally included in an order made on 8 May 2014 as part of the Lordship Lane area traffic order and sign decluttering review . The name of the Order was the London Borough of Southwark (Waiting and loading restrictions) (Amendment No. 32) Order 2014(3) ('the 2014 Order').


As part of our review process, surveys on street were undertaken by an officer to check that the road markings in existence matched the traffic orders. In the case of Ashbourne Grove and Melbourne Grove the traffic order waiting and loading definitions would have been amended to reflect more closely the markings as existed on street. Chesterfield Road had new lengths of restrictions installed at this time.


Statutory stakeholders and ward members including yourself were consulted in the process of making the 2014 Order, on 10 April 2014.


I trust this addresses your concerns but if you have any questions about this response please do not hesitate to contact me.

"

Back on the subject of the North X Rd/Lordship Lane roadworks (can we keep the yellow lines debate on the other thread?)?


Start date: 22 June

Original end date: 7 August

Revised end date: 24 August

Revised revised end date: 7 September


Um, anyone know when the revised revised revised end date is?

redjam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Back on the subject of the North X Rd/Lordship

> Lane roadworks (can we keep the yellow lines

> debate on the other thread?)?

>

> Start date: 22 June

> Original end date: 7 August

> Revised end date: 24 August

> Revised revised end date: 7 September

>

> Um, anyone know when the revised revised revised

> end date is?


2017??

They can't complete it without working on it. I don't think I've seen anyone doing any work there in over a week now. It must be extremely frustrating for businesses along that stretch. I can't understand the total lack of urgency from the ouncil or contractor. There can't be any kind of penalty clause in the contract.


In the real world delivering a project nearly two months late would a lot of financial pain pain for the contractor.

I've been told the new deadline is now 2 October.

Matter escalated as to why and how such inordinate times to do something quite so basic.


Clearly the FMConway contract doesn't have enough teeth to ensure proper service levels and performance.

My FOI around this still no response and data.

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They can't complete it without working on it. I

> don't think I've seen anyone doing any work there

> in over a week now.



That's not true at all. I've seen workmen doing things every morning. Yes the time taken to complete this is ridiculous but to say no work has been done is just wrong.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Absolute mugs. That's what they take you for.  
    • Trossachs definitely have one! 
    • A A day-school for girls and a boarding school for boys (even with, by the late '90s, a tiny cadre of girls) are very different places.  Though there are some similarities. I think all schools, for instance, have similar "rules", much as they all nail up notices about "potential" and "achievement" and keeping to the left on the stairs. The private schools go a little further, banging on about "serving the public", as they have since they were set up (either to supply the colonies with District Commissioners, Brigadiers and Missionaries, or the provinces with railway engineers), so they've got the language and rituals down nicely. Which, i suppose, is what visitors and day-pupils expect, and are expected, to see. A boarding school, outside the cloistered hours of lesson-times, once the day-pupils and teaching staff have been sent packing, the gates and chapel safely locked and the brochures put away, becomes a much less ambassadorial place. That's largely because they're filled with several hundred bored, tired, self-supervised adolescents condemned to spend the night together in the flickering, dripping bowels of its ancient buildings, most of which were designed only to impress from the outside, the comfort of their occupants being secondary to the glory of whatever piratical benefactor had, in a last-ditch attempt to sway the judgement of their god, chucked a little of their ill-gotten at the alleged improvement of the better class of urchin. Those adolescents may, to the curious eyes of the outer world, seem privileged but, in that moment, they cannot access any outer world (at least pre-1996 or thereabouts). Their whole existence, for months at a time, takes place in uniformity behind those gates where money, should they have any to hand, cannot purchase better food or warmer clothing. In that peculiar world, there is no difference between the seventh son of a murderous sheikh, the darling child of a ball-bearing magnate, the umpteenth Viscount Smethwick, or the offspring of some hapless Foreign Office drone who's got themselves posted to Minsk. They are egalitarian, in that sense, but that's as far as it goes. In any place where rank and priviilege mean nothing, other measures will evolve, which is why even the best-intentioned of committees will, from time to time, spawn its cliques and launch heated disputes over archaic matters that, in any other context, would have long been forgotten. The same is true of the boarding school which, over the dismal centuries, has developed a certain culture all its own, with a language indended to pass all understanding and attitiudes and practices to match. This is unsurprising as every new intake will, being young and disoriented, eagerly mimic their seniors, and so also learn those words and attitudes and practices which, miserably or otherwise, will more accurately reflect the weight of history than the Guardian's style-guide and, to contemporary eyes and ears, seem outlandish, beastly and deplorably wicked. Which, of course, it all is. But however much we might regret it, and urge headteachers to get up on Sundays and preach about how we should all be tolerant, not kill anyone unnecessarily, and take pity on the oiks, it won't make the blindest bit of difference. William Golding may, according to psychologists, have overstated his case but I doubt that many 20th Century boarders would agree with them. Instead, they might look to Shakespeare, who cheerfully exploits differences of sex and race and belief and ability to arm his bullies, murderers, fraudsters and tyrants and remains celebrated to this day,  Admittedly, this is mostly opinion, borne only of my own regrettable experience and, because I had that experience and heard those words (though, being naive and small-townish, i didn't understand them till much later) and saw and suffered a heap of brutishness*, that might make my opinion both unfair and biased.  If so, then I can only say it's the least that those institutions deserve. Sure, the schools themselves don't willingly foster that culture, which is wholly contrary to everything in the brochures, but there's not much they can do about it without posting staff permanently in corridors and dormitories and washrooms, which would, I'd suggest, create a whole other set of problems, not least financial. So, like any other business, they take care of the money and keep aloof from the rest. That, to my mind, is the problem. They've turned something into a business that really shouldn't be a business. Education is one thing, raising a child is another, and limited-liability corporations, however charitable, tend not to make the best parents. And so, in retrospect, I'm inclined not to blame the students either (though, for years after, I eagerly read the my Old School magazine, my heart doing a little dance at every black-edged announcement of a yachting tragedy, avalanche or coup). They get chucked into this swamp where they have to learn to fend for themselves and so many, naturally, will behave like predators in an attempt to fit in. Not all, certainly. Some will keep their heads down and hope not to be noticed while others, if they have a particular talent, might find that it protects them. But that leaves more than enough to keep the toxic culture alive, and it is no surprise at all that when they emerge they appear damaged to the outside world. For that's exactly what they are. They might, and sometimes do, improve once returned to the normal stream of life if given time and support, and that's good. But the damage lasts, all the same, and isn't a reason to vote for them. * Not, if it helps to disappoint any lawyers, at Dulwich, though there's nothing in the allegations that I didn't instantly recognise, 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...