Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Apologies if there is already a thread on this, but I can't see one.


Does anybody know how long these roadworks (or whatever they are) are going to take? There never seems to be anybody working there.


The bus stop has been out of use for weeks, which must be difficult if you have a disability affecting your mobility, as you have to walk to the previous or next stop.


Also it's an absolute nightmare trying to turn left into Lordship Lane from North Cross Road if there is a lot of traffic. The lights which allow traffic only one way are right at the end of the road, and you basically hold up the whole traffic stream going towards the library when you try to turn after the lights go green.


But if there's a lot of traffic you might never get out at all if you wait :(

The reason for this, and I loosely quote our Councillor, is to make that area a better experience for pedestrians. The other unstated reason seems that it is one small piece in a larger reworking of ED highways, roads and paths, designed to increase cycling, reduce parking and reduce car ownership/use. Therefore you have the deeply unpopular Townley redesign, attempts to make Melbourne a closed street and creation of restricted parking in places where there was none.


It has been noted that the timing of this attempt to radically change our lives has fallen at a similar time that at least two and possibly 3 major building projects( the two new schools and M&S) are soon to start, and which will probably create even more obstruction and chaos, since we know how little oversight there is of developers and builders in the borough.


I walked right past Townley on Friday at around 11am expecting to see workmen scurrying around, but no, a few ambled aimlessly while another hovered around a stationary small digger, no work going on. I see the boards state no expectation of completion before end of month.


It all feels rather perverse and the only person who seems the least bit concerned is an ex councillor, our current rep seems to withdrawn from discussion.

As I mentioned above ' green plastic piping '.. This evidently is used for Sewage & Drain Lines..


So would seem to be essential works.


FYI.


http://www.cornerstoneprojects.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Underground-Utility-Colour-Codes-Diagram.jpg


DulwichFox

DF, green piping has also been newly laid at Townley, at some point since the works there began. i was told by a guy on site that this is a necessary part if changing the whole junction, so presumably the same applies to Nx. If it is solely about renewing sewage and drainage pipes, then I stand corrected.

first mate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DF, green piping has also been newly laid at

> Townley, at some point since the works there

> began. i was told by a guy on site that this is a

> necessary part if changing the whole junction, so

> presumably the same applies to Nx. If it is solely

> about renewing sewage and drainage pipes, then I

> stand corrected.



How are they "changing the whole junction", first mate?


Have I missed something?


I don't recall seeing anything anywhere about this junction being changed?


ETA: Anyway, whatever they are doing I wish they'd hurry up with it :)

Thanks, that's very enlightening!


"Start date 22 June - end date 7 August."


Footway resurfacing supposedly finishes today, then there is two nights of some other resurfacing, carried out by - er - "surfacing". For "Two nights under 1 way LED lights phase".


So HOW ON EARTH can it take them seven (?) WEEKS to do that?


It's already one way. There is massive disruption to pedestrians and traffic.


Why can't they co-ordinate their works so that areas aren't left half finished for weeks at a time with nobody working on them? Surely that's a pretty basic management skill???

Hi Sue,


From S'warks website, though see other threads where more recent info on changes is cited by Woodwarde


What are the proposed changes?


? Removal of existing staggered pedestrian crossings with the implementation of shorter, single movement facilities.

? Introduction of a diagonal pedestrian crossing to link footways adjacent to both schools and cater for an existing pedestrian desire line.

? All pedestrian facilities to operate at the same time to reduce waiting time for pedestrians and improve the efficiency of the junction.

? Cycle pre-signal on Townley Road and Green Dale to allow cycles to enter the junction and undertake turning movements before general traffic.

? New signalised cycle gates on both Townley Road and Green Dale where cyclists are held on a red signal whilst general traffic movements operate. This removes the risk of both left hook and right hook collisions. (Please note that more confident cyclists will still be allowed to use the general traffic lane to traverse the junction from either Townley Road or Green Dale).

? Semi-segregated cycle lane and advanced cycle waiting area on East Dulwich Grove (westbound) to allow cyclists to bypass waiting vehicles and gain priority at the junction.

? Footway buildouts to reduce crossing distances for pedestrians and to visually improve the streetscape.

? New two stage right turn facilities for cyclists to assist right turning movements into either Townley Road or Green Dale from East Dulwich Grove.

? A semi-segregated cycle lane is proposed on Townley Road to allow cyclists to safely pass queuing traffic and access the cycle facilities at the junction.

? A new segregated cycle lane is proposed linking Calton Avenue with Townley Road to allow cyclists to bypass the Calton Avenue / Townley Road junction.

? All existing turning movements at the junction are retained, including for coaches.

? There will be a slight loss of capacity over the existing layout but the junction will continue to operate within acceptable levels of saturation.

ed-pete,


Yes I know, I was actually making a wider point about all the various roadworks and mooted road changes in the area, of which Nx road is one and Townley another.I was also pointing out, in response to Foxy, that Townley, is having sewage pipes relaid as part of larger scale works, inferring that laying of similar piping at Nx does not mean sewage is the primary reason for the works...convoluted, I know.


I cited the above as I thought Sue had queried changes being made to Townley, but rereading I now see she thought I was talking about changes to Nx. No matter, it is my understanding that Nx pavements onto LL are being built out- the pavement will be considerably wider and the rationale for this was to make it a 'nicer' experience for pedestrians. I also recall talk of bike racks being put there but don't know if that is still on.


However, you are right, I have taken the thread off track, so will now shutup!

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I thought these were the roadworks.

>

> John K



I don't think there are currently any outside the Palmerston.


The traffic light at the start of them is on the corner of NX Road, outside Londis.


They seem to be the ones described in ed_pete's map above.

Still, once it is done pedestrians will have a 'nicer' experience, so has to be worth it.


I quote JB from an earlier thread last year


" The NXR/LL has a number of pedestrian movements but primarily these works are to make this junction more pleasant and a better experience."

first mate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Still, once it is done pedestrians will have a

> 'nicer' experience, so has to be worth it.

>

> I quote JB from an earlier thread last year

>

> " The NXR/LL has a number of pedestrian movements

> but primarily these works are to make this

> junction more pleasant and a better experience."



But according to the plan above, all that is being done is "resurfacing".


Do you have a link to the other thread you mention?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No, because they are a business and their job is to make a profit. It is the local council, on our behalf, who should be giving regard to the environment. Gala, not unreasonably, might take the view that it is the council's role to protect the environment of Southwark, and if they have no objection to this scheme then frankly why shouldn't they (Gala) go ahead? And the council also seems to take the view that they are focused on revenue and not the environment. Otherwise they might listen to the environmental pleas here. The mistake you are making is assuming that either party to this transaction (we are clearly only bystanders) gives a flying fig for the environment when there is money in the offing.
    • It struck me last year that any dialogue with Gala themselves e.g. at the box-ticking "Community Engagement Sessions" is completely pointless, as they are just a business trying to do whatever is necessary to hold their event; the park is just a venue to them, a necessary facility, and they'll say anything to secure it. They don't care about it's welfare or upkeep, over and above making sure there's no complaints big enough to prevent them using it again. I've found that discussing issues with them has just led to them using that info to counteract that issue - effectively helping them strengthen their position. What I find frustrating is that the council, despite being the body that decides on this, and should be representing local residents, takes no active part in any discussions or presentations, so there's no way to engage with them apart from an online consultation which is clearly also a box ticking exercise, bearing in mind for the last two years the overwhelming majority (97% of respondents) objected to the event. Why are Gala running the community meetings? Why do Gala run the issue hotline? If the council really care about the park and the surrounding community, and still allow this type of event, they should be way more hands on with taking responsibility for it's running, not just handing it all over to a profit making company.  Sorry, probably tldr but so sad about the repeated negative impact on our (once beautiful & peaceful) park and just exasperated that there's so little that can be done to halt it. This is just the start, it WILL turn into another Brockwell Park, and Gala & the council just don't care.
    • We used these guys for our underfloor heating, their heating engineer Sam was excellent. Very reassuring and sorted it all out properly.
    • They’re convenient. They’re fun to ride. From ED, getting a Lime to Brixton and then jumping on the tube is probably the fastest way to get into central London. There’s a reason they’re  popular.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...