Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2 Hours watching sky news live from Iran ........


This lot of maniacal priests with a Bomb.....not bloody likely, hopefully this address will mean no more chatting with this Iranian pixie and his little sports jacket. Christ you would have to be on Zanex to sit quitely in front of this guy, never heard so much balls in my life, how does a whole nation fall for this nonsense ?


There are less women in the crowd than in Gordon Browns cabinet !

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6713-iran-with-a-bomb-not-likely/
Share on other sites

AllforNun Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This lot of maniacal priests with a Bomb.....

> ...

> how does a whole nation fall for this nonsense?


Israel: another middle-eastern state dominated by fanatical religious ideas and with loads of Bombs has managed to indoctrinate the entire western world with its bizarre beliefs.


Where is the logic in supporting one and opposing the other?

hi hal !


well simple, really


The jewish state does not see it as a slight against their existence to not believe in their religious beliefs.....that's the logic + the fact that the leader of israel has never stated that another country needs to be wiped of the map, plus the fact that you have never seen a press conference where 10's of thousands of citizens of a jewish state are shouting "death to the uk" as i just witnessed on sky.


whatever my issues with israel they pale into insignificance with that of a state run by a bunch of fucking loonies, aytollha my arse, if he posted on here i would take him to the cleaners and still have enough left for after's. There is nothing Holy about that man, nothing.

AllforNun Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The jewish state does not see it as a slight

> against their existence to not believe in their

> religious beliefs.....that's the logic


Israel's existence relies on acceptance of the irrational notion of divinely appointed sovereignty. Those who deny that premise are considered enemies of the state.


> + the fact

> that the leader of israel has never stated that

> another country needs to be wiped of the map,


Except Palestine, of course.


> plus

> the fact that you have never seen a press

> conferance where 10's of thousands of citizens of

> a jewish state are shouting "death to the uk" as i

> just witnessed on sky.


Tell that to all the Brits killed when Israeli terrorists bombed the King David Hotel.

Or the many individuals killed by MOSSAD death squads.

Or the thousands of Palestinians killed at Sabra and Shatila.

Or the hundreds of children killed in Gaza.


> whatever my issues with israel they pale into

> insignificance with that of a state run by a bunch

> of @#$%& loonies,


Yet they look very much like the Ultra Orthodox loonies that hold the balance of power in Israel.


> aytollha my arse, if he posted

> on here i would take him to the cleaners and still

> have enough left for after's. There is nothing

> Holy about that man, nothing.


Holy? I was hoping for a rational discussion.


As long as one religiously deluded state is armed with nuclear weapons, the others will also want them.

I too have issues with the way Israel conducts itself in fact rather than in it's rhetoric, but it is a state that would prefer peace even if it seems a bit stupid in the ways to achieve it.


Bringing up the David hotel helps noone, it's like saying we can't trust the german because they didn't keep their promises at Munich.


Like Israel, Iran has a large and sophisticated professional tier who would prefer reform and peace, bt they are ruled by a ruling elite that when it is by definition extremely conservative and like any revolutionary generation hugely paranoid.


Israel isn't ruled by hardliners, though they have a voice disproportionate to their popular support (the hardliners in Iran do enjoy popular support, hence why the mullahs took control after the shah was bright down by an extremely broad coalition and why the current standoff is potentially so fraught, it could essentially be a revisit f the post revolutionary struggle, but this time the reformers know the price of failure) and their government ers on the side of hawkish. To compare the two however s unhelpful and disingenuous. I'd elaborate more, but fecking iPhones aren't fun.

Neatly dissected but still a rubbish argument, those comparisons are weak arsed.


The chances of letting Iran have a bomb should be less than zero. If the people don't rise up an overthrow this bunch of religious fruitcakes then there will be a lot of civilain casualties. Thats what will happen, fact.


I would rather give the biggest guy in the playground a hammer than hand it to the smallest and most insecure one, it's a fact of life.

Which they can't ... Next.


Iran has simply learnt the bvious lessons of Iraq v n Korea. If you ACTULLY have WMD you don't get invaded. Attacking Israel with nukes would only result in MAD. Even the mullahs aren't that stupid.


I'd rather they didn't have them but then I'd rather we obeyed our duties as signatories to the nuclear non proliferation treaty and didn't renew trident so no joy all rOund

I don't think it'll be long until the Iranian's get their hands on nuclear weapons. They'll probably just end up buying one on Ebay of the Russians and it'll be delivered in a wooden box and left under the kitchen sink until Isreal has the cheek to open a Macdonalds on the Gaza strip.

It is highly questionable whether Israel has the military capability to destroy Iran's nuclear program, or even to delay it for several years.


Should the approaches made by the Obama administration not prove fruitful and who can predict in these new times, then Iran will possess nuclear weapons in a relatively short time.


Consequently, Jerusalem need to adjust their mindset to accomodate an Iran with a nuclear strike capability against Israel.


Israel has over egged the pudding with the Iranian threat in my view.


Certainly, the regime in Tehran is an embittered and intransigent rival, however it is a leap from there to proving a real existential threat to Israel.


Iran's delving into regional terror is worrying, but financially supporting terrorism amd the intent to engage in a nuclear exchange with Israel are a quantum distance apart.


MAD, will prevail in the region and deter attacks.


There has to come a time to desist from potraying a threat which may not materialise, hold back from sabre rattling, which presents the serious possibility of unencumbered escalation.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...