Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The problem, matthew123, is that you are wrong - and your own posts of the Code show that. You have made two points repeatedly: that "pedestrians have right of way at junctions" and that "pedestrians have priority at road junctions". Both statements are dangerously wrong as they miss a very, very important point.


Skidmarks' post is correct, though. The code says that pedestrians have priority provided they have started to cross. This is an important distinction. If a pedestrian steps out into the path of a car turning at that junction they will be at fault: as per highway code rule 7d [pedestrians] If traffic is coming, let it pass and highway code rule 8: [pedestrians] At a junction. When crossing the road, look out for traffic turning into the road, especially from behind you.


So, if a pedestrian wished to cross the road at a junction and a car wishes to turn at that junction the car has the right of way. If the pedestrian has already begun to cross then - and only then - do they have priority.


The exception to this is at a zebra crossing where pedestrians do indeed have right of way.

What LOZ said?

Totally.



I see so many pedestrians who don?t even bother looking.



Arrogant Footers?

Or death wish Footers?

Or followers of the Matthew123 school of walking?


? It?s bleedin annoying.



When I walk across junctions I look I wait for the cars I?m in no hurry to end up in hospital.


I?ve noticed pedestrians are getting more and more arrogant.


I see pedestrian rage every day at crossings they try to cross on the red man and then get annoyed when you drive through on a green light.



Rush Rush Rush



Pedestrians who are rushing for WHAT? An accident?




Idiotic ARROGANCE.



Edit


Forgot to add


"STUPID FOOTERS"!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s probably best described as Tudorbethan. It displays a rather twee, rose tinted yearning for a lost England that never really existed. Much like many posters on this forum. 
    • That house it almost literally the polar opposite of Art Deco style. 
    • Our first 'Double Bubble' of the festive season, pile on those points as well as the pounds.  Week 13 fixtures...   Saturday 29th November Brentford v Burnley Manchester City v Leeds United Sunderland v AFC Bournemouth Everton v Newcastle United Tottenham Hotspur v Fulham   Sunday 30th November Crystal Palace v Manchester United Aston Villa v Wolverhampton Wanderers Nottingham Forest v Brighton & Hove Albion West Ham United v Liverpool Chelsea v Arsenal   Tuesday 2nd December AFC Bournemouth v Everton Fulham v Manchester City Newcastle United v Tottenham Hotspur   Wednesday 3rd December Arsenal v Brentford Brighton & Hove Albion v Aston Villa Burnley v Crystal Palace Wolverhampton Wanderers v Nottingham Forest Leeds United v Chelsea Liverpool v Sunderland   Thursday 4th December Manchester United v West Ham United
    • It's definitely not Art Deco style, regardless of when it was built otherwise all houses built in the 1920s could be described as Art Deco.  The estate agent's blurb desribes it as being built about 1914 in the style of Lutyens whose work has been described as being in the Arts and Crafts style with a heavy Tudor influence.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...