Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The problem, matthew123, is that you are wrong - and your own posts of the Code show that. You have made two points repeatedly: that "pedestrians have right of way at junctions" and that "pedestrians have priority at road junctions". Both statements are dangerously wrong as they miss a very, very important point.


Skidmarks' post is correct, though. The code says that pedestrians have priority provided they have started to cross. This is an important distinction. If a pedestrian steps out into the path of a car turning at that junction they will be at fault: as per highway code rule 7d [pedestrians] If traffic is coming, let it pass and highway code rule 8: [pedestrians] At a junction. When crossing the road, look out for traffic turning into the road, especially from behind you.


So, if a pedestrian wished to cross the road at a junction and a car wishes to turn at that junction the car has the right of way. If the pedestrian has already begun to cross then - and only then - do they have priority.


The exception to this is at a zebra crossing where pedestrians do indeed have right of way.

What LOZ said?

Totally.



I see so many pedestrians who don?t even bother looking.



Arrogant Footers?

Or death wish Footers?

Or followers of the Matthew123 school of walking?


? It?s bleedin annoying.



When I walk across junctions I look I wait for the cars I?m in no hurry to end up in hospital.


I?ve noticed pedestrians are getting more and more arrogant.


I see pedestrian rage every day at crossings they try to cross on the red man and then get annoyed when you drive through on a green light.



Rush Rush Rush



Pedestrians who are rushing for WHAT? An accident?




Idiotic ARROGANCE.



Edit


Forgot to add


"STUPID FOOTERS"!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Won't someone think of the poor people burdened with a £2M house "through no fault of their own" .....  seriously? This is literally unearned money mainly gained through govenrment policies that has given home ownership preferential treatment for decades but you think it is fairer to rise income tax?  Young graduates are already effectively paying a higher marginal rate of income tax due to student loan repayments and can barely afford to rent in London,   but it is fairer not to touch the unearned housing wealth of boomers?  
    • Do your own research.  Pay per mile is the most equitable way of raising revenue from driving as you pay, per, mile.  Ideally you'd replace both VED and fuel duty with this, with some weighting for cleaner vehicles.  A more progressive system would change the rate according to the time of day such as the cost for using the tunnels under London. Electric vehicles were always going to lose the perks once mass adoption was under way.  They will still be far cheaper to run, particularly if you have a home charger using off peak rates (as low as 10p a KWt).  Excise duty has already been introduced for EVs and CC will come in next year. Stop suggesting it is some sort of conspiracy. Government have chickened out putting up fuel duty by inflation, again, and reversing the temporary reduction brought in by the last lot.  Cowards.  Pushing me towards the Greens although some of the economic policies are daft.   
    • Don't think I know anyone in a £2m house, so on a personal level irrelevant. However on a related matter there does need to be reform of Council Tax as many around here have done large extensions but still being charged the same as some who are in properties which have not been touched. It would be better to discuss the budget as a whole.  Off to do some research on issues that matter to me, sustainable transport, climate change and the like.
    • "High Value Council Tax Surcharge – The government will introduce the High Value Council Tax Surcharge a new charge on owners of residential property in England worth £2 million or more, starting in 2028-29. Local authorities will collect this revenue on behalf of central government. Revenue will be used to support funding for local government services, with further detail to be set out at the next spending review. The government will consult on implementation of HVCTS in the new year." https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/budget-2025-document/budget-2025-html#policy-decisions, which shows (Section 5.1, item 54) a projected revenue of £400m in the first year.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...