Jump to content

Pussey Liquor bar new to the Lane


Recommended Posts

I quite like the sound of a bar with rotating chefs / pop ups.


The main problem with that venue though is the narrow street frontage. It's a good space inside and it has a decent garden, but from the outside you can easily pass it without a second thought.


The name is crushingly lame, hopefully they may rethink it.

Went passed yesterday lunch time.. They were closed...


Went by again 20.30 . there was a group of 4-5 people outside. One asked are we going in?

Door was opening but on inquiring they were told 'We are closed.'


So have no idea what is going on there.?


Is it actually open for trade yet. ??


DulwichFox

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > No sign writing.. Just the Cat symbol.

>

> Probably a good thing!


Do you think they might be reconsidering the name having seen some peoples comments on The EDF.

All a bit late now.


Foxy

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm stumped by this. On their FB page posted 1

> hour ago (FB time), it says they are open tonight

> from 6pm. To book a table visit their website,link

> provided. Try the link and website is 'under

> construction'. What's that all about?


Just click on the little i bottom right hand corner for a sample of Web Site


Menu and contact details. http://www.pusseyliquor.com/


71 Lordship Lane,

London SE22 8EP


07734 928778


[email protected]


Foxy

I had dinner here last night with the other Mr Derwent Grove. We both thought it was a welcome addition to LL. The owner (Chloe) explained that they aim to rotate between up and coming chefs about three times per year (the current duo are called Smoke & Salt). I have to say that the cocktails, starters and mains were all innovative and excellent (no room for dessert). The wine list had some unusual varieties (we braved the 'Asshole Sauvignon Blanc' - from Germany - which fortunately tasted much better than it sounded).


Overall it felt a bit like the Peckham Refreshment Rooms but structured into courses. If you can get past the name without clutching your pearls you are in for a treat.

That's what they're calling their wines? Can't imagine asking for a bottle and you don't need to be a pearl clutched to find the idea of this place unnecessarily awful and tacky. Not quite sure how this place got past Southwarks planning but with so much choice around will be easy to give it a wide berth.

In common with most restaurants I don't think they get to name the wine themselves. Somebody else did that for them (the wine maker, at a guess):


http://mrvine.co.uk/Red-Squirrel-Wine-172/Asshole-Sauvignon-Blanc-2013-Germany-470


The rest of the list was conventionally named but interesting - not sure I've had a Malbec from Languedoc before, for instance, and that also went down very nicely.

derwentgrove Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I had dinner here last night with the other Mr

> Derwent Grove. We both thought it was a welcome

> addition to LL. The owner (Chloe) explained that

> they aim to rotate between up and coming chefs

> about three times per year (the current duo are

> called Smoke & Salt). I have to say that the

> cocktails, starters and mains were all innovative

> and excellent (no room for dessert). The wine list

> had some unusual varieties (we braved the 'Asshole

> Sauvignon Blanc' - from Germany - which

> fortunately tasted much better than it sounded).

>

> Overall it felt a bit like the Peckham Refreshment

> Rooms but structured into courses. If you can get

> past the name without clutching your pearls you

> are in for a treat.


Thanks for that. I'll try them out next week.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • I am sorry to  continue this, but I found your previous  comment about me very personal,  disturbing and upsetting, which was why I responded at length. I'm sorry it bored you. I try to stick to facts. I have investigated. You (and anyone else) can go into the "search" settings on here and  do a search on an author's name. So you can (I presume) find all my posts, including any which were  replying  to you. I can't imagine that they are in greater numbers than my replies to anyone else, but you can see for yourself. I guess you can probably also find examples of what you call my "usual sarcasm". I wasn't aware that l had a tendency to sarcasm, though I do find a lot of things funny.  There is no need to reply to this unless you actually find evidence in support of what you said. Sorry everybody else. I had to get it off my chest as I was lying awake last night worrying about it 😭
    • Roy Ayers RIP   https://www.theguardian.com/music/2025/mar/06/roy-ayers-jazz-funk-pioneer-everybody-loves-the-sunshine-dies
    • The Section 20 is just notification of intention to carry out works.  You have the right to object, propose an alternative or find different contractors. If you are joint freeholders why is your co freeholder acting unilaterally?  What is your usual mechanism for making decisions?
    • Hello, Does anyone have any other recommendations? Thank you
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...