Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There's a proposal to install a security camera and recording equipment to monitor the entrance to our gated development. The best position for both the camera and the recording equipment is to attach it to a particular property in the development. How much rental would be reasonable for the managing agents to pay the owner for this (to be split between all properties via the service charge) and are there any other matters to take into consideration?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/66411-security-camera/
Share on other sites

I can't say how much would be reasonable - presumably they are getting the benefit too? But it terms of what to take into account I would see it being a combination of factors such as:


Does the property with the camera have any obligations to maintain it? Assume not.


Does the property with the camera have to allow access to its property for maintenance or checking the equipment is working properly - if so inside or out and how often?


If a neighbour wants to check the footage for some reason - do they have to ask the property with the camera to check or can it all be done remotely?


Basically comes down to what the neighbour has to do in respect of the camera? If not much, minimal fee to deal with access for maintenance/checking, reduced to take account of the share of the benefit they get from it.

If it's using the property's power supply then a small fee to cover the electricity makes sense, based on agreement that the owner will ensure continued supply. Assuming the recording equipment is remote, so not sited inside the property.


Beyond that, I don't see it any different from having a street name sign on your house, which there is no rental for.


Other matters: data protection stuff; including signage, who will be the Data Controller, etc.

All fair points, I wasn't considering it might use the property's power or require access to the property, all of which could change things (very slightly).


But if it's just a small camera being mounted to a wall and nothing more involved than that, then I don't think it's reasonable at all to expect a payment.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Dear Sue, straight ahead from the sign in question. Left at Goose  Green, right at East Dulwich Grove and on to the real Dulwich.😜
    • What is wrong in getting "something for nowt", that's what inheritance in 96% of cases is. IHT is a death tax, taking 40% from those that inherited from their partner, parents, family etc. . You live in a world blinkered by your Lefty views, No doubt you were a cheer  leader for Corbin as well, oh how sad.  
    • America don't care, Biden has done this to create Trump with a major problem. And its four months since the Stooge party took office, they'll blame everything on Lammy who told Trump what he thought of him, we're on our own on this one. And would Putin strike London? Take out the Bridges from London Bridge to Vauxhall Bridge, job done, London split in two, it would be utter disruption on a grand scale and utter, utter chaos with no immediate recovery. 
    • what it all reminds me of most is the introduction of the minimum wage, and the dire predictions from vested parties But that all turned out pretty well and no-one would scrap it now would they? jazzer man - walk away from the weird websites you spend too long on. It's kinda weird "Why should ANYONE have to pay inheritance tax when the original owner has already paid tax on it." because you just got summat for nowt original owner is dead already so it's not a death tax You just don't like the idea of tax at all - so I'm not sure where money for public services would come from in your world
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...