Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There's a proposal to install a security camera and recording equipment to monitor the entrance to our gated development. The best position for both the camera and the recording equipment is to attach it to a particular property in the development. How much rental would be reasonable for the managing agents to pay the owner for this (to be split between all properties via the service charge) and are there any other matters to take into consideration?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/66411-security-camera/
Share on other sites

I can't say how much would be reasonable - presumably they are getting the benefit too? But it terms of what to take into account I would see it being a combination of factors such as:


Does the property with the camera have any obligations to maintain it? Assume not.


Does the property with the camera have to allow access to its property for maintenance or checking the equipment is working properly - if so inside or out and how often?


If a neighbour wants to check the footage for some reason - do they have to ask the property with the camera to check or can it all be done remotely?


Basically comes down to what the neighbour has to do in respect of the camera? If not much, minimal fee to deal with access for maintenance/checking, reduced to take account of the share of the benefit they get from it.

If it's using the property's power supply then a small fee to cover the electricity makes sense, based on agreement that the owner will ensure continued supply. Assuming the recording equipment is remote, so not sited inside the property.


Beyond that, I don't see it any different from having a street name sign on your house, which there is no rental for.


Other matters: data protection stuff; including signage, who will be the Data Controller, etc.

All fair points, I wasn't considering it might use the property's power or require access to the property, all of which could change things (very slightly).


But if it's just a small camera being mounted to a wall and nothing more involved than that, then I don't think it's reasonable at all to expect a payment.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
    • I used Aria recently to replace the basin waste for my bathroom sink. He was super friendly, communicative and helpful - including changing the washer on the new replacement I bought to ensure longevity. Would highly recommend. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...