Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yesterday evening a few children (in the age range 6 to 12) were happily playing on the pavements along Colwell Road. They had some pavement chalks and after producing a long, illustrated hopscotch grid they started a competition for who could produce the best pavement picture. Their artwork was really creative (flowers, mosaics etc).


A few minutes later one of them knocked on the door to report that two community officers had come along and told them to remove these pictures as they are "graffiti". The disconsolate kids borrowed buckets and brooms and scrubbed away all of their artwork.


It doesn't take much water to remove children's pavement chalk (indeed last night's rain would have been enough). But those children won't be engaging in that game again.


Dear community officers, if you happen to be reading this, then I hope you realise just how misguided your enforcement was in this pathetic little incident. Perhaps you thought you've just nipped in the bud some potential future criminals, but instead you've killed off some spontaneous creative street play, the like of which hasn't been seen on East Dulwich streets since the 1950s (or so some threads tell us).


Does anyone know what the law is regarding pavement chalk/hopscotch etc?


UPDATE AT 2.30pm

Rang the Community Wardens about this, they checked up and rang back. The situation seems to be that the law is vague - pavement chalking might be regarded as graffiti because it is writing on public land, even though it's temporary. But it's almost inconceivable that a child would even be cautioned for such a thing unless what they chalked was offensive. The wardens concerned won't challenge these children again (if they do, I'll be on the case immediately).


Now, where can I buy some chalk...?

goodness that's ridiculous, i'm always getting the chalk out in the summer with the kids as it cleans off.


i think the saddest point is that it's great to hear that children are playing out on the street and instead of being encouraged they are told off for chalk pictures.


i know that these guys do a great job and in general i like having them around so i'm not having a go at them just the on the spot decision that was taken-that is all.

Zaardvark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Considering how long the council seem willing to

> allow footpaths to be littered with borken glass

> (min 4/5 days in my experience) and so on, this

> seems ridiculous.

>

> Z


I guess the community officers are concerned with minor public order offences.


Broken glass is a street cleaning issue and hence a different department.


I imagine they are told to err on the side of caution (ie I can almost imagine a thread on here titled 'Unsightly children's chalk drawings on my road simply must stop NOW')

All PCSO?s do is hassle children, homeless people and beggars. I have seen them telling a nine year child to cycle on the road or face a twenty pound fine. They didn?t know that children under 16 are allowed to cycle on the pavement. When I challenged them they said ?they often cycle up to people and steal their mobile phones and we have to nip it in the bud?. I pointed out that if they suspected this child of being a phone thief they should do something about it. They replied they didn?t, so it was a stupid argument. Two of them in Manchester last year watched someone drown because of ?health and safety?. They are a waste of space and money.

Fair point MM, wasn't meaning to pass the buck here, and have phoned Southwark this morning, who passed me on to the Dulwich community wardens (telephone 7525 0036). They are going to get back to me on this.


By the way, I'm not sure what I've done to deserve to be addressed as "Rev".


Yours


Reg.


Marmora Man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rev,

>

> Don't pass the buck - ring, write or email

> Southwark and make your comment / complaint. I

> agree entirely with the thrust of your argument -

> but not the lack of action.

Chick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> All PCSO?s do is hassle children, homeless people

> and beggars. I have seen them telling a nine year

> child to cycle on the road or face a twenty pound

> fine. They didn?t know that children under 16 are

> allowed to cycle on the pavement. When I

> challenged them they said ?they often cycle up to

> people and steal their mobile phones and we have

> to nip it in the bud?. I pointed out that if they

> suspected this child of being a phone thief they

> should do something about it. They replied they

> didn?t, so it was a stupid argument. Two of them

> in Manchester last year watched someone drown

> because of ?health and safety?. They are a waste

> of space and money.


If they try the ?20 fine for cycling on the pavement thing, just cycle off.


Actually, if they approach you regarding anything just cycle off.


What are they going to do, chase you on their scooter?

Chick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> All PCSO?s do is hassle children, homeless people

> and beggars. I have seen them telling a nine year

> child to cycle on the road or face a twenty pound

> fine. They didn?t know that children under 16 are

> allowed to cycle on the pavement. When I

> challenged them they said ?they often cycle up to

> people and steal their mobile phones and we have

> to nip it in the bud?. I pointed out that if they

> suspected this child of being a phone thief they

> should do something about it. They replied they

> didn?t, so it was a stupid argument. Two of them

> in Manchester last year watched someone drown

> because of ?health and safety?. They are a waste

> of space and money.


As a matter of fact a child under 16 years cannot be issued with a fixed penalty notice, (any infringement of the law has to go through the full process), however, there is NO legal exemption for children under 16 from the law that prevents cycling on the pavement (Section 72 of the Highways Act 1835 as amended by Section 85 (1) of the Local Government Act 1888). Police are not expected to prosecute very young children and can use their discretion for others so, unless a child was getting in the way of pedestrians, or acting in some provocotive manner, it is highly unlikely that they would be prosecuted. For confirmation see Dft and other government websites

Why don't you come to the Ward Panel meeting on Thursday 11th at 7pm at Harris Girls Academy, meet the police, PCSOs, Community Wardens, and ask them everything you're concerned about, yourselves?

Then you'll be aware of the facts. THEN you can stop talking crap and if you DO see a CW or PCSO or even heaven help us a police officer doing something wrong, you all know what's what and can report to their supervisors accordingly.

Sorry - bad day. But at least I am giving information!

>:D Why don't you come to the Ward Panel meeting on

> Thursday 11th at 7pm at Harris Girls Academy, meet

> the police, PCSOs, Community Wardens, and ask them

> everything you're concerned about, yourselves?

> Then you'll be aware of the facts. THEN you can

> stop talking crap and if you DO see a CW or PCSO

> or even heaven help us a police officer doing

> something wrong, you all know what's what and can

> report to their supervisors accordingly.

> Sorry - bad day. But at least I am giving

> information!



>:D<

Domitianus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Went to one of those once and the traffic wardens

> clamped me outside for parking on a very poorly

> painted yellow line!


This didn't really happen. "I can't back that up with paperwork" he says, in his best Dr Evil voice.

gerritsmith Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ah yes, the community officers.

>

> Have you ever seen one patrolling the streets at

> night?

>

> I suppose, crime and antisocial behaviour don't

> occur at night.


I think you miss the point of them.


In the same way that 'bobbies on the beat' do nothing to quell crime, they just make frightened voters feel like something is being done - so do community officers serve to provide a visible reassurance to people who spend their every waking hour afraid of being a victim of crime.


So there's little point in them being out at night when no-one will see them.

Peckham Rose,

I appreciate your efforts to get people 'on board' (Sir Alan speak) come from the heart, but they're clouded by a clipboard-crazy attitude, desperate to make everyone 'get it' just because you think it's right.

It is inconceivable that a PCSO (be they were in their usual troika, which any right minded individual would consider a waste of resources) should berate a child for chalking, especially when they know that the British summer has its own anti-temporary graffiti measure in the shape of frequent showers.

I have yet to see a PCSO or Community Warden get their hands dirty near the station in Peckham where people drop litter willy-nilly and shop owners blare out music and use the gutters to deposit their (animal and vegetable) rubbish, and where white van men and lorry drivers park harum-scarum on pavements and over yellow lines to the annoyance and delay of bus passengers and the safety of pedestrians.

Again, a reasonable person would feel let down if a warden goes after an easy target while much more serious law infringements are taking place.

I am up north on Thursday 7th, but please can you pass on my thoughts?

Off you go you patronising bu**er. I do not have any attitude - just that I care and wish people would stop using this forum to whinge on about things that we can't do anything about when they could try and aim to the right people when that opportunity exists. It may help, that's all.

Of COURSE it is wrong that the PCSOs did this. Of course I agree it is wrong!

So email these two,

Ediz.Mustafa@met.police.uk

Neil.Cook2@met.police.uk

tell them you are aware that the Ward Panel meetings are this Thursday and you can not make it.

Tell them you would like to be involved as a caring and concerned member of the community.

And ask them what they thought about it.

I am not sure if the road concerned is in the area concerned so you could ask these two and they can tell you if it is, and if not which area it is in.

I have also emailed all the members on the panel and asked them themselves to check in this forum. Maybe they'll read your post and answer it though I doubt any are proactive in the community as SMB Jones is to us with the railway.

Who knows if they will or have time to? But I will suggest it.


OK I'm off.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...