Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well the CEO of sky does a darn site more than head of vision on half a mill at the BBC ! I doubt the head of vision would know where to start in the corporate world of sky. Remember sky built a platform the like of which the great and good at the BBC had not the first clue about. That model was then rolled out across the globe and effectively changed the global media landscape. They fuelled a revolution in the technology sector and continue to do so. The BBC is the equivalent to the government changing the expenses system after the Telegraph outed them anyway. So stop waving around figures that you have no idea about and as for Head of access services there is one otherwise you would not be getting all your subtitles and on screen hand waving stuff that you no doubt so rely on.


And as for equivalent of salaries in the Business sector they are not in the FUCKIN business sector that's the point they have come up through years of political wangling and many have hugely suspect abilites. They would sink into obscurity if they were forced to more into the business sector. Look at the once great M Jackson of BBC and C4, he went on to get head hunted by Viasat as it's CEO and lasted, yes lasted 3 WEEKS....3 BLOODY WEEKS before he was moved !!!!! he has since had to basically re-train over the last 6 years in an office in New York. What a joke.


Know lets see their expenses and then watch what happens ....you hat eat ......i think


AFN

Strange is'nt it that every other news service is running with the headline that IRAN ACCUSES BRITAIN OF TREACHERY yet on the BBC news online service no mention, just the headline - Ayatollah issues stern warning to protesters.


It's almost as if the BBC know that the website will be seen in IRAN.....oh i mean its almost as if the GOVERNMENT know that the website will be seen in IRAN


Editorial independence ...pull the other one !

oh right yes obviously a few 100 000 people chanting death to the uk, uk are our enemies and being led by their religious leader is not a headline leader oh excuse me i am so sorry of course it's not like they are building a nuclear device and that most of the children of that nation will remember chanting death to the uk for many years. So grow up yourself.

I think you have got slightly mixed up...


yesterday at around 11am sky (and most new agencies) broadcast a 2 hour live feed from Iran, this also showed the 1hour speech of the cleary mad ayatollah, the supreme leader of Iran. Part way through the speak he suddenly comes out with "the uk are our most treacherous enemies" and then the masssed crowds of just several hundred thousand, lots wearing the green suicide head banner of hizbollah stand up and start shouting "death to the uk" for ooh about 3 minutes !


2 hours later Our clearly mad leader Gordon Brown Holds a hastily put together news conference at yes you guessed it the ministry of defence no less, they then summon the Iranian Ambassador to the Foreign office.


At that point it all went quite on the BBC and the headline got changed to " ayatollah issues stern warning to protesters"


So someone somewhere decided not to escalate this incident anymore and it got squashed.


So there you go, in a nutshell.


So anyway the point being that if you are still Deluded enough to think that the BBC actually has true editorial independence then clearly you are well on your way to being as mad as the mad Mullah of Melbourne Grove ! now that, i did just make up, as far a i am aware the residents of Melbourne grove are fine.

I'm not sure why you think that proves that the BBC doesn't have independence.


You haven't actually got a clue why the story was the way it was.


The media has a legal responsibility not to give a platform to those who incite racial hatred, so that would be a pretty good reason not to use this coverage in particular. Please don't confuse that with freedom of speech. We are most certainly not free to say whatever we like in the UK.


Either way, I don't actually know, and make no pretence at knowing. You own pretence is really a rather silly conspiracy theory that appeals to the champagne revolutionaries in Nunhead.

Nonsense you wally !


have you ever heard bin ladens voice on tape or video ? or well i can't face naming the huge list -


Actually my friend "The media has a legal responsibility not to give a platform to those who incite racial hatred" is balanced with the notion of public interest and secondly all the other UK news outlets led with the other headline. So once again your talking rubbish a pastiche of ill informed liberal nonsense, back of the class for you Mr H - try harder next time.

Public interest is indeed a complicated idea. Is it in the public interest to promote conflict?


Many news stations would have come to the conclusion the they gave less of a monkeys about public interest and more about ratings.


Thankfully unlike Sky and the Nunhead massive, the BBC doesn't have a tabloid mentality.

the BBC doesn't have a tabloid mentality.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Not in your dreams they don't but here in the real world they are as TABLOID as they come.


You are living in this little green pastured land of middle britain that actually bears no resemblance to the real world.. Let her go H she's been cheating on you behind your back.


oh and we do not have any Nunhead massive, we leave all that gangster shit to the Crews & Gangs of East Dulwich...shank shank

So The BBC head decides to try and head off any questions about BBC expenses by publishing them then tries to push the story down the news agenda.


Is he going to get away with it ?


The List is not even complete all the real juicy stuff is hidden; not the talents pay, which they will release if it gets to hot for the Executives but the real good stuff. All the travel expenses, half baked first class air fair EVERYWHERE, Massive restaurant bills Michelin starred of course, members club expenses, and lots lots more, So come on journo's if you ain't scared of Aunty, get digging it will be solid gold.


No doubt Mark Thompson is praying for Jeremy Bowen to get himself arrested in Iran.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...