Jump to content

What is East Dulwich reading?


gallinello

Recommended Posts

"Last week I read:- We Really Must Talk About Kevin - Lionel Shriver"


You mentioned this in relation to El Pibi?o's penchant for meat art, I had a quick google and it looked intriguing enough.

Recommend?


For the record Pibi?o makes stuff out of anything and everything, a stool was an aeroplane, a cone his seatbelt and a shop receipt the newspaper the lady gives you, it was unfortunate there just happened to be some kidney to hand at that moment ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sunnyside by Glen David Gold - a kind of multi-episodic sprawling narrative type revolving around Chaplain, Pickford and Fairbanks et al. with seemingly unrelated elements like lighthouse keepers and wild west shows performing for the Kaiser coming together through the Liberty Loans campaign of future presidential candidate William G McAdoo.


only halfway through it though so it could end up being about something else entirely - it's that kind of book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Jiri Weil's Mendelssohn is on the Roof.


First impressions are that this is excellent; there are things about it that bring to mind Catch 22 a little bit. As this was published 6 years beforehand I wonder if it had some influence over Heller's own work.


---


hmm, given it wasn't translated til the nineties this is unlikely. Anyway, recommended.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For anyone who likes a good page turner thriller, Linwood Barclay is my new favourite. Just finished "Trust your eyes" which has quite a good back story where a crime is caught on camera by an internet mapping camera (like Google streetview, but called something different in the book).


I have just started my first ever Robert Goddard book after my wife got me 10 of his novels cheap from the book people. Only a few pages in, but seems okay so far, and a couple of people at work tell me they're fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I've just finished Ready Player One.

One reviewer desxcribed it as a nerdgasm, which is about right.

It's very silly, but as a child of the eighties a book obsessed with bad hair, John Hughes films, blue monday, erin grey, godzilla, the dungeons and dragons cartoons, deloreans, coin op arcades and the Atari 2600 was right up my street.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Just finished 'The Hundred-Year-Old Man Who Climbed Out of the Window and Disappeared' by Jonas Jonasson.


A very sweet and funny book translated from the Swedish original.


difficult to describe but if it was made into a film it would be a combination of 'Up' and 'Forrest Gump' and would be directed by the Coen brothers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

reading Marc Morris' The Norman Conquest.


Very good, well worth it and makes you realise how little we were taught about this period bar the headline soundbites (most of which are simplistic, dubious, misleading or plain myth).


The first hundred pages provides fascinating insight into the background.

I did find lots of references to Cnut and Harthacnut constantly gave a jolt gievn waht we konw abuot how we inerrptet wodrs on the paeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, no, that's called "Doctor Sleep". Heard mised reviews on Radio 4 review show.


11.22.63 sounds good. Reminds me of a film I say years ago called Running against time, where they try to stop JFK getting killed, thinking it would have stopped the Vietnam war. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0100529/plotsummary?ref_=tt_ov_pl It was probably rubbish, but I remember it being good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was pretty instrumental in escalating the conflict, so seems a dubious conclusion to come to.


I've a very interesting diplomatic and policy history of the war, much of it based upon transcripts of declassified conversations, many of them in the oval office itself.


Basically it boiled down to 3 presidents in a row thinking the war was a very bad idea but each one thinking it had to pursue it in the first term in order to extricate themselves in the second term; political posturing for domestic consumption.


President 1 died, 2 retired and 3 did what he said.

All told that involved keeping a war going for votes 10 years longer than necessary.


We'll never know if Kennedy would have managed to extricate the US from the conflict, but given that withdrawal would have resulted in the overthrow of a client government by a communist insurgency, I can't see how he'd have done it any differently to Johnson.


Nixon certainly didn't achieve peace with honour and was probably responsible for the most killing by indiscriminate bombing, but he did finally say, ok we'll lose the war on my watch!!


A very interesting read if anyone wants borrowage (once I have it back from lendage)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.aaaanyway.


I'm partial to a bit of speculative hitory fiction.


I have C.J Sansom's Dominion (the usual in a long tradition of bad guys winning world war 2) ready to go, and from the blurb it seems to share some traits from Man in the High Castle and Fatherland, both of which I enjoyed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He was pretty instrumental in escalating the

> conflict, so seems a dubious conclusion to come

> to.

>

> I've a very interesting diplomatic and policy

> history of the war, much of it based upon

> transcripts of declassified conversations, many of

> them in the oval office itself.

>

> Basically it boiled down to 3 presidents in a row

> thinking the war was a very bad idea but each one

> thinking it had to pursue it in the first term in

> order to extricate themselves in the second term;

> political posturing for domestic consumption.

>

> President 1 died, 2 retired and 3 did what he

> said.

> All told that involved keeping a war going for

> votes 10 years longer than necessary.

>

> We'll never know if Kennedy would have managed to

> extricate the US from the conflict, but given that

> withdrawal would have resulted in the overthrow of

> a client government by a communist insurgency, I

> can't see how he'd have done it any differently to

> Johnson.

>

> Nixon certainly didn't achieve peace with honour

> and was probably responsible for the most killing

> by indiscriminate bombing, but he did finally say,

> ok we'll lose the war on my watch!!

>

> A very interesting read if anyone wants borrowage

> (once I have it back from lendage)



Dude is was an early 90s made for TV movie. Don't overthink it man!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Week 10 fixtures...   Saturday 2nd November Newcastle United v Arsenal AFC Bournemouth v Manchester City Ipswich Town v Leicester City Liverpool v Brighton & Hove Albion Nottingham Forest v West Ham United Southampton v Everton Wolverhampton Wanderers v Crystal Palace   Sunday 3rd November Tottenham Hotspur v Aston Villa Manchester United v Chelsea   Monday 4th November Fulham v Brentford
    • More interested in the future than the past. 
    • The plans The developer Berkeley Homes have submitted a planning application to redevelop the Aylesham Centre close to the junction of Peckham High Street and Rye Lane, containing Morrison’s supermarket, car park, & petrol station, Aylesham shopping arcade and most of that side of Rye Lane between Hanover Park and Peckham High Street. The application is for a mixed housing, retail, leisure and commercial development, in buildings ranging from 5 to 20 storeys. Impact Local people who have studied the detailed plans think that the development would dominate the historic town centre which has evolved since the 18th century, and would ruin the Conservation Area which was awarded in 2011 'to preserve and enhance its character and appearance'. More than 65% of the homes to be built in this unimaginative over-bearing development will be unaffordable by most people who live in Southwark, and provide inadequate open and green space for this part of Peckham. Need for discussion This is such an important issue for south London that it needs wide discussion before the Council Planning Committee takes its decision (not before next Spring). A free on-line talk and discussion to clarify the heritage issues we all need to think about is being held on Monday 11th November 7-8.30pm. All will be welcome. Please register on this link: https://Defend-Peckhams-Heritage-2024.eventbrite.co.uk There are several other key issues raised by the plans which are being examined in the Aylesham Community Action (ACA) campaign. You can find the link to all that and other useful information here: www.linktr.ee/acapeckham The zoom session is being arranged by Peckham Heritage the local group that has grown from the community work alongside the restoration of nine historic buildings in Peckham High Street through the Townscape Heritage Initiative. We hope that EDF members who value local heritage will be able to attend the session to hear and take part in the discussion, and report back to this topic so the discussion can continue.
    • I did see a few Victoria bound 185's on East Dulwich road around 5pm this evening. Coming from the Rye end and heading toward Goose green
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...