Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have to be at the V&A for 9.45 tomorrow morning.


Since I retired that's like the crack of dawn to me!


Is it best to get train to Victoria from Denmark Hill then district line and if so what time should I get train?


Going to Alexander McQueen exhibition hooray! :)


ETA: wondering if I should allow extra time for rush hour etc??

That's probably quickest route, but if it were me - and this is just because I hate rush hour trains and tubes - I'd allow a bit longer and take 345 bus from Cambeerwell to South Ken.


Why? Get a seat and no changing.


But. It does take at least an hour so I'd check TFL journey planner for how long it's currently taking at that time of day.


Supposed to be an amazing show, I was due to yo as part of a corporate party thing hut it was night that Michelle Obama decided to go so we all had to wait outside and then I ran out of time. Boo.

Please God DO NOT go the bus route unless the trains are completely screwed up. Speaking from experience its very hit and miss (I do Denmark Hill or Peckham Rye to South Ken for work).


Your hour could be an hour and a half and its not exactly a direct route! Train quick and only two stops on the tube from Victoria so a sweaty 5 mins only to put up with....


HP

Yeh thanks hpsaucey, I just looked up the bus timetable and had reluctantly decided it had to be the trains .......




hpsaucey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Please God DO NOT go the bus route unless the

> trains are completely screwed up. Speaking from

> experience its very hit and miss (I do Denmark

> Hill or Peckham Rye to South Ken for work).

>

> Your hour could be an hour and a half and its not

> exactly a direct route! Train quick and only two

> stops on the tube from Victoria so a sweaty 5 mins

> only to put up with....

>

> HP

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We're not talking about people who've bought farms. We're talking about people who have inherited multi-million pound estates, having done nothing to earn it. Why should they not have to pay some tax on that.  
    • If 500 farms sell off 20% of their land each year (the PMs estimate on the back of a Rizla paper)  then how long before we lose large chunks of farm land ?  As for giving away land, sure providing they live 7 years afterwards  Stop being a labour cheerleader and put yourself in farmers wellies for a moment.  Farming is a necessity, doesn't make Massive profits and after you consider the 7 days a week often 14 hour days, I bet most farmers don't even earn minimum wage per hour.  You will soon be whinging if there's no fresh veg on the shelves to go with your non existent turkey at Chrustmas.     
    • it's not that many farms and they can always gift it to their hardworking offspring before they die, can't they?   as for Trump. funny how no-one ever complains when it's trump doing Name calling. Or Tories talking about EU leaders or threatening Irish food supply - never about "making it hard to work with people" then 
    • Farmers don't earn a lot, work 7 days a week and whilst they are land rich, it's a working asset not a space that can (or should) be sold for building on.  But as you are so keen on change, give up your day job and go buy a farm then come back on here in a year and tell us how well that goes for you.  Sometimes you really are a handle that opens doors 🤔
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...