Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ok everyone - need your help on this one. Today at approx. 4.10pm i parked outside Soup Dragon to go in and get something. Upon my return at approx. 4.25pm i was greeted with a big fat parking fine. Now - i am sure there is a 30min parking restriction there between 10am-7pm so i shouldn't have got a ticket. Am i right?? The sign basically says 'Parking - 10am to 7pm - 30mins - No return within 2 hrs.


Thanks all.

I think the problem is that unless the ticket warden observed the time you parked how does he know you parked at 4.10pm and not 3.50pm? It sounds like he has made an assumption. Read the ticket carefully to ensure you have not received it for any other reason.Then contest it. Quite a igh percentage of parking tickets can be overturned if contested. Do you have a receipt from the shop you visited? This should have a time issued on it and may strengthen your case.

Thanks for that. The time on the ticket reads 16:15 so about 5 mins after i had parked up - and yes i do have a receipt which reads 4.25pm from soup dragon. I even got the chap from soup dragon out to also look at the parking sign and he agreed i was in the right and knows how long i was in the shop. I feel a letter coming on.


Thanks for your advice.

They try it on all the time - it's licensed banditry, no skins off their nose if illegally given tickets get scrapped but in many cases people are intimidated by the escalating fines and threatening letters and pay up and the warden get their commission...of course, non-car owners in the anti-brigade ( *coughs, Hugenot and Sean) think they are doing a public service by giving out illegal tickets and have no conception about the sharp practices employed by these maggots. If you're in the right fight it, and complain to your councillor...
Thanks EDmummy. I have a feeling that the strip along where the East Dulwich Deli is has a parking restriction from 4pm but where i was parked was up until 7pm. Hmmmmmmm. I find those signs slightly confusing - is it just me? And annoyingly i tend not to park along LL either for that very reason. Anyway moan over - i'm going to challenge it. Thanks for advice all.

If you were legally parked, you will be fine. Quids is right, these guys try it on all the time. As we all know, they're on commission, so it's not surprising that they hand out tickets even when they're not certain it's legitimate.


Don't pay the fine, follow the "representation" procedure. Write a letter, including any evidence you have.


If the council are stubborn, they will reject your first representation. If this happens, take it all the way to the personal hearing - chances are that the council will give up at this stage and you will automatically win. Keep at it... it's a very long process, and don't be put off by their attempts to raise the fine over time.

Absolute jokers! I never have, nor will ever pay a parking fine. I have pretty much always observed the rules, yet still been issued 4 or 5 fines over the years. A quick ranting letter and they've overturned them every time. It's just like ???? says, licensed banditry.


I think anyone who issues a fine that gets overturned should be fined themselves. That'd stop them being so damned slap-happy. Although, it would probably also decrease the leniency of those receiving my complaints...

elliemon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thanks EDmummy. I have a feeling that the strip

> along where the East Dulwich Deli is has a parking

> restriction from 4pm but where i was parked was up

> until 7pm. Hmmmmmmm. I find those signs slightly

> confusing - is it just me? And annoyingly i tend

> not to park along LL either for that very reason.

> Anyway moan over - i'm going to challenge it.

> Thanks for advice all.



I wouldn?t challenge it until you?ve been back and check the signs.


I think if you have parked in the bus lane outside Soup Dragon after 4pm then I?m pretty sure that you don?t have a leg to stand on.


If you challenge it you?ll lose and end up paying ?120.


Currently in the bus lanes on LL you can?t park between 7am and 10am and 4pm and 7pm.


So you can only park when the shops are open between 10am and 4pm.





This is one parking restriction which I believe should be changed on Lordship Lane there is very little need for the 4pm restrictionon that side of LL.


Busses do not need a clear bus lane in the afternoon after 4pm in that direction.


Its all part of the parking bus lane NONSENSE.



Check and pay is ASAP if I?m correct the sooner I pay them the sooner I forget and move on.



EDIT added info


I had a look as I was driving past and I'M WRONG the NO parking on that side is from 7am-10am so you should not have had a ticket.


Did you park with a wheel on the pavement?

That is a favorite one in Southwark.!


Best to Re read the ticket.

After contesting a fine with numerous letters without success I informed the local councillors and MP of the situation and the fine was instantly put on hold, never to be heard of again. If you're in the right I would recommend this course of action if necessary.
I don't have a car but have noticed that these guys are really getting aggressive with the number of fines they are issuing around here (as I tootle around with the pushchair!)- yesterday saw them stop and start issuing a ticket to a van that had stopped to do a single household delivery...he didn't even warn them he was there standing in front of the van, just pulled in on his scooter behind a parked car and stood there at the front of the van out of view of the driver taking notes...Its seems to be turning into some on-street real-life gaming scam.

>

> If you challenge it you?ll lose and end up paying

> ?120.




Need to correct you on the "...end up paying ?120." It's wrong. You're given tome to pay the original fine amount of your appeal is unsuccessful. Also - they'll almost always decline the initial appeal (weeds out the non-serious appealers) so always go for a second appeal.

>

>

>

>

Definately persevere with appeal if you feel you have a strong case. Southwark tried to scare me off by increasing the fine to ?180 and then offered me a last chance to pay ?120 one week before arbitration. I declined their kind offer and they decided not to fight the case three days before the hearing date.

We have appealed a couple of tickets in our own road and had them overturned both times, we kept getting scary letters about escalating fines (to ?180), which we just ignored because we had written contesting the original fine.


Saw an article a while back with statistics on the proportion of appealed fines that are overturned, and Southwark had a very high proportion, so well worth pursuing.


When you write to them, send it by recorded delivery so they can't claim they never received it (they tried this with us, hence the escalating fine letters, we were able to prove that they had received our letter).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...