Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We've had them in Sydenham too. I pretty much agree with the arguement that Royal Mail are not supporting them by posting their leaflets, just providing a postal service. It is also quite funny, as it shows that they simply don't have the support required to do post outs. Labour, Tories, Lib Dems, Greens, all would have volunteers doing mail shoots.


My issue about it is simply that a black postman may feel pretty wrong in having to post this shite, but at least they are sticking two fingers up at the BNP, and showing that they are hard working British people, working for Royal Mail and earning an honest wage, unlike these slimey cnuts!

Is that some allusion to 'fascism'?


I thought Rik Mayall politics died with the Young Ones.


surely if their leaflets were banned from being posted it would actually give them more publicity ?


Denying even extreme left- or right groups a voice is more dangerous than allowing them to speak - better to let their arguments fall flat through discourse and debate rather than supression

The graphics are rubbish & based (partly) on that "Flimsy" reason they will not get my vote


Also as a grateful dyslexic , the logo/name BNP gets mixed up with TCP & NCP with a dusting of BP......all of which just say "YUK" to my mixed up brain ( I was so tempted to write "brian" there )




Make sense? ...no .....ohh it does to me!




W**F



*eats alphabet spaghetti for comfort....*

I haven't received one either. I'd be interested to know whether the envelopes are franked or stamped, i.e. whether the BNP had to pay or whether the BNP now qualifies for a mailshot due to the level of support it got in previous elections. However, I did find this:


http://www.socialistunity.com/?p=4041

jimmy two times you hit the nail on the head there: where is this money coming from? which leads me to worry about the real concern: the fact that they could do really well at these european elections and getting support financially is just one sign that they're getting more and more people thinking that it's ok to support the BNP.

plimsoul Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> jimmy two times you hit the nail on the head

> there: where is this money coming from? which

> leads me to worry about the real concern: the fact

> that they could do really well at these european

> elections and getting support financially is just

> one sign that they're getting more and more people

> thinking that it's ok to support the BNP.


Um... donations at a guess?


There's a 'donation-o-meter' on their site - http://bnp.org.uk/2008/12/ybnp%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%98billy-brit%E2%80%99-proves-to-be-a-hit/


They are still a joke party who can't debate and have no watertight policies.


I say bring in PR instead of our joke electoral system and let them get representation, if they were given a serious political platform rather than 'comedy' status they'd quickly be demolished.

I don't have a huge problem with political parties getting their manifesto across by mailshot - even when I strongly disagree with their views.


The problem with the BNP is that their slick marketing is designed to appeal to vulnerable and disenchanted victims of circumstance. And there is a veneer of respectability, which hides the nasty, vile core values of the party.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...