Jump to content

Recommended Posts

wulfhound Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Might be one to drop Tessa Jowell a line about,

> though - she seems to be making the case for more

> walking & running as part of her election campaign

> - see

> http://essays.centreforlondon.org/issues/technolog

> y/london-a-walkable-city/ - and presumably knows

> that junction?


Jowell has, in the past, been made aware of the problem. However, as TfL are accountable to the Mayor and thus the GLA, rather than Westminster, it really devolves down to GLA reps and however much Jowell can supply in the way of graceful tutting, it makes no discernible difference. The local labour group, which included Helen Hayes, sent out postcards before the last local elections drumming up support for improvements to the junction, but nothing came of it, as you'd expect given the history. Val Shawcross and Caroline Pidgeon have both responded positively in the past but TfL successfully managed to avoid their interest by swifly putting out assurances implying that improvements were already scheduled. This is a favoured TfL tactic as it takes people a long time to notice that scheduled works don't happen, during which time there's usually been a new strategic plan or a revised set of priorities or a new budget or an entirely different administration, any of which lets them throw issues of their choosing into the 'legacy' box and pretend they never existed.


This is broadly how, despite being "prioritised" in at least two separate London-wide junction-improvement plans, under both Livingstone and Johnson, the junction (along with many other examples of TfL's murderously complacent contempt for pedestrians) has not been touched in over a decade, even though a pedestrian-friendly design has been commissioned, drawn up, consulted on, safety-checked and funded. When last challenged on this, TfL (after a long delay) changed tack slightly and decided there wasn't enough evidence that it wouldn't disrupt traffic flows (they put it a bit differently, but it comes to the same thing - in effect, they decided they'd need to analyse traffic flows again, but found themselves unable to bring themselves to do so, despite being the only body that can). Which means, as others have suggested, that TfL won't be doing anything until enough people have stepped forward to dent the safety statistics.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Other than acting as 'interested parties' Southwark Councillors have no responsibility for water issues. And no real leverage either. Considering the complete disdain with which Thames Water treats its own Regulator, and the government, (let alone its customers) I doubt very much whether an entire battalion of councillors would have much impact. What powers could they exercise?
    • That may not be so - many on this site are experts in many areas - you yourself claim huge traffic management (or similar) expertise for instance. And I think you will find that Southwark employees are unlikely to support criticism or challenges to Southwark policy - why, you don't and you apparently neither live in, or vote in, the borough. Do you, however, work for it, as you are such a cheerleader? If not, then you are the most passionate disinterested person on this site, as regards so many aspects, not just traffic.
    • Rather than have a go at Southwark,  contact them, they will employ at least one arborist who will know far more than most people on this site. Here's one: https://www.linkedin.com/in/shaun-murphy-morris-03b7b665/?originalSubdomain=uk
    • I would look in the surrounding area as once they realise it has nothing they could sell or of obvious monatary value in it they'll dump the bag and contents.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...