Jump to content

Charlotte Church

????

By ????
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Loz

Loz

Posted
Posted

There is some absolute gold in the comments section. My favourite: "Spot on churchy the powers that be are afraid of you because all the grannies love you".


A close runner up was: "Seems to me, Charlotte, that you have more balls than do your detractors. And, being a lass, that?s a scrotal burden you?re not encumbered with."

*Bob*

*Bob*

Posted
Posted

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


'Absolute gold'? You reckon? Low standards, I guess, Loz. They're piss-poor. Cringeworthy. The second one doesn't even make any sense, no matter how many times you read it.


Never ceases to amaze me - the level of basic misogyny meted-out to largely harmless female targets who stick dare to their head above the parapet. Doesn't matter if they're ugly, stunning, razor sharp, a bit dim, have a doctorate or one CSE, common as muck or dead posh, written fifty books or one the first one.. one things's for sure: there will always be a load of arseholes lining-up to tell them to get back in their box, love.

Loz

Loz

Posted
Posted

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> 'Absolute gold'? You reckon? Low standards, I guess, Loz. They're piss-poor. Cringeworthy. The second

> one doesn't even make any sense, no matter how many times you read it.


Erm, yes. Piss-poor and cringeworthy are why they are 'gold'. The first one didn't make a lot of sense, either.


You're the last person I thought I'd have to explain that to.

Loz

Loz

Posted
Posted

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Never ceases to amaze me - the level of basic misogyny meted-out to largely harmless female

> targets who stick dare to their head above the parapet.


Considering your baiting of the "largely harmless" Louisa last week, you might be on a bit of dodgy ground there, *Bob*.

Blah Blah

Blah Blah

Posted
Posted
I'm with Otta. I like that Church is fighting her corner. And some women ARE given a raw deal for having opinions. Is that sexism? Misogyny? (that word always seems to get the most guilty of men riled up). At the end of the day she has an opinion. We may agree with it, we may not, but sneering because of her background or gender isn't clever. Like I said before, I like her style.
JohnL

JohnL

Posted
Posted

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm with Otta. I like that Church is fighting her

> corner. And some women ARE given a raw deal for

> having opinions. Is that sexism? Misogyny? (that

> word always seems to get the most guilty of men

> riled up). At the end of the day she has an

> opinion. We may agree with it, we may not, but

> sneering because of her background or gender isn't

> clever. Like I said before, I like her style.



I hope it's not because she is a bit Futurama Welshie


It's too easy to laugh at the intensity/excitability/passion

sometimes but it is a trait sorry to say and it's so nice

that she does seem to care :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • TheOG
      Baby-Friendly Screenings at East Dulwich Picturehouse – Too Restrictive?

      By TheOG · Posted

      I was surprised to learn that East Dulwich Picturehouse now only screens PG-rated films for their baby-friendly showings, unlike other Picturehouse branches. Apparently, this change happened after a complaint to the council about showing films above a PG rating to infants. Afaik, this policy only applies to this  branch. As a local parent, I find this frustrating. It limits our options, especially when many of us would love the chance to watch a wider range of films while caring for our little ones. For example, during Oscar Week, only one vintage film is being shown. Are we really expected to only consume toddler-focused content, like Cocomelon? I also worry about the precedent this sets. If other institutions, like the Tate or the National Portrait Gallery, applied similar restrictions, parents could be left with only child-oriented content. Babies under one don’t fully comprehend adult themes, so shouldn’t there be more flexibility? I’d love to hear what others think—should this policy be reconsidered?
    • YazzieSE22
      Derelict Grove Tavern - who to contact?

      By YazzieSE22 · Posted

      I am a secondary teacher in the local area and totally agree that it’s so important for teenagers to be given a space to connect and learn skills. I think it’s lovely that they’ve been able to do this organically due to the carpark being derelict but it defeats the very concept of dynamic urban living to use this as a reason to block the development of the space into something that could benefit the whole community. I would really welcome an entrepreneur bringing a proposal forward that thinks about how we could best make the space work for everyone. I’d also love to see the council engage with the kids themselves on how and where to make the skate park permanent, perhaps in Dulwich Park itself. Give them some funding to make it nicer than a space by such a busy traffic route. I also agree we shouldn’t romanticise the skate park - they’re not principals in the Royal Ballet Company. I don’t think it’s hugely affecting the community, but let’s not pretend there isn’t some underage drinking and drug use going on there. But mainly the building itself is a waste of space and it’s often depressing to see the private security company vans parked out there late at night. Let’s use it as an opportunity to engage in conversations about what this part of Lordship Lane really needs. 
    • kford
      VW badge theft in ED - advice on next steps

      By kford · Posted

      This kind of thing? https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/286379655798?  
    • Dogkennelhillbilly
      Has anyone had food poisoning from icecream at a local cafe? (name removed)

      By Dogkennelhillbilly · Posted

      🙄

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...