Jump to content

ED Picturehouse. Elitist*. (Louisa's lounged response)


Recommended Posts

*Bob* in your eternal quest to ridicule me and foxy you've failed miserably on this one.


MY point is this. If an independent like PeckhamPlex can charge ?4.99 in zone 2 London, why the buggery balls can't the BIG chains do the same?


Louisa.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Problem is that *bob* is not as good as taking the

> piss as he thinks he is..


I?d be delighted to received some tips from you, Foxy. After all - you?ve been tickling the forum funny bone for many years now, day in, day out.


What?s your secret?

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Problem is that *bob* is not as good as taking the

> piss as he thinks he is..

>

> Most people that selectively take the P can be

> funny.

>

> *DulwichFox*


He's making me laugh.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> MY point is this. If an independent like

> PeckhamPlex can charge ?4.99 in zone 2 London, why

> the buggery balls can't the BIG chains do the

> same?


If Ryanair can change ?40 return to fly to Spain, why can't BA do the same?

Jeremy and your point is? Are you suggesting there is some hidden cost such as quality of service, seating etc etc that is compromised by cheaper tickets?


Looking at my example independent smaller chains, they seem to have everything in order and keep prices low to attract large audiences. Nothing is compromised at all.


Louisa.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > MY point is this. If an independent like

> > PeckhamPlex can charge ?4.99 in zone 2 London,

> why

> > the buggery balls can't the BIG chains do the

> > same?

>

> If Ryanair can change ?40 return to fly to Spain,

> why can't BA do the same?


Because BA doesn't have outside toilets on their aircraft..


Foxy

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do Ryanair flights land on runways?

>

> Louisa.



Yes they do but not necessary at the right Airport..


Ryanair flight lands at wrong airport


From a height of 33,000ft, the world below can seem a tranquil if confusing place. Gazing down through a veil of cloud, it's not difficult to confuse one main road with another or to mix up two different towns. Apparently, it's also quite easy to mistake one airport for another, even if you're the one flying the plane.


That seems to have been the case when the captain of a Ryanair flight from Liverpool to the City of Derry airport brought his plane down at a military airbase five miles away.


http://www.theguardian.com/business/2006/mar/30/theairlineindustry.travelnews


Foxy

Jeremy the last time I went in that building it was J Sainbury before it relocated to DKH. It can't be that bad surely? What do you expect from a cinema experience?


Foxy that is outrageous. Not that I would personally complain about landing at an airbase with all those young men around me! Very poor standards though. Have you ever flown with Ryanair? I flew with them to Tenerife on a package deal some years ago and wasn't overly impressed, checking the size of my bag and trying to charge me for being over the weight and size limit etc.


Louisa.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You've never actually been to Peckhamplex, have

> you?


HA HA HA


So busted.




I fully support Louisa's campaign to keep low-priced local cinemas alive .. despite not actually using them, thus leading to them closing down and being replaced by higher priced cinemas.

*Bob* just because I don't use them doesn't mean I can't have an opinion about them does it? It's a great resource for people with kids or who are into film, and these big chains surely can't justify these extraordinary prices, when smaller firms are doing it for less?


Louisa.

Jeremy you don't have to be Jonathan Ross to have an opinion about cinemas. For god sakes, this is getting more and more bizarre by the second. Just for the record, I KNOW WHAT A CINEMA IS I HAVE BEEN IN MANY. The last one I went to was in Cromer in fact and again I paid under a fiver for a latest release in a independent pictures!



What sort of experience do people wish to have at a cinema? Are you going to watch a film and be entertained or are you going for a gastromic treat to blow your mind whilst being sat in leather seats studded with diamonds. Jeez.


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello! I would be keen to hear from parents of secondary-school age in state schools of the cost of school trips overseas. Particularly interested in Kingsdale and Charter but all examples welcome. many thanks!
    • Or the government have it wrong. Certainly picking a fight with farmers, the very definition of working people, is probably not going to end well. The problem here is that Labour hung their hat on not taxing "working people" which was clearly the output of some awful focus group and clearly not the term they wanted to use. They failed to properly qualify what a working person is and it is now coming back to haunt them because the very definition of a working person is anyone who is, well, working and that covers a whole gamut of people and salaries. Don't pick a fight with farmers if you have stated you aren't going after working people because public opinion will be against you. Farmers are the backbone of any country and work so hard and yes, there are some that are incredibly well off but the majority are not and farming is a trade that gets handed down through the generations. And farmers will make their case very public in ways other groups won't.   Labour's communication has been awful but they got a free pass before the election because everyone was so focused on how awful the Tories were. But now they are in power and they are tripping themselves up because in leadership you need more than soundbites.   The "Son of a Toolmaker" is the type of thing that haunts politicians until the end of their career. Clearly someone decided to detach Keir from his grammar school, university (including Oxford), legal career, knight of the realm background. His face when everyone laughed when he mentioned it during one of the pre-election debates was a picture. He is the son of a toolmaker but you look a bit silly when people then say yes but your dad ran a tool-making company...   Coming into power on a ticket of "look how they have been behaving" and then behaving in many ways the Tories were has been a disaster for politicians of all parties. The clothing funding and access to no.10 was just a nightmare for them and in these days where today's newspaper is no longer tomorrow's chip paper the comments made about Trump (which I am sure most people can agree with) are just embarrassing.   Winter Fuel Tax has been a disaster. Yes, there are many pensioners who don't need it but those aren't going to be the ones talking to the media about how awful the winter is going to be and people only remember those shouting the loudest.   The budget was an interesting one. I was watching Theo Pathitis on TV and he had swung from the Tories to Labour ahead of the election and was talking about the impact of the Employer NI and you could tell that he was very carefully choosing his words as he knew how hard this was going to be on business and what the implications are but clearly didn't want to be left with egg on his face as he was telling everyone to vote Labour ahead of the election.   Labour were, understandably, happy to right the massive wave of Tory discontent and pre-election all of the world's ills were down to the Tories. The first speech Starmer gave after winning spoke nothing about the previous government but everything about global challenges that were going to make it tough. The challenge for Labour is they convinced people that every problem was down to the Tories and that removing them would solve everything but things are not as straight forward as that. I senses things changing when they announced the 22bn blackhole and many people said...but 9bn of that are based on decisions you made in relation to public sector pay rises. Labour are finding out, to their cost, that being in opposition is easy. Being in power is not.          
    • Adsl over copper is not obsolete, these are lines that are fed on exchange only and are still being installed now and will be for foreseeable, they are being changed to sotap which is basically no dial tone and will be voice over internet 
    • Russia is the aggressor.they did have a second rate army most of it gone.why is putin so deluded .in that Russia can use chinese  Iranian  north Korean missiles drones to attack unkraine civilians city's energy facilties.they have escalated the war  by using north Korean soldiers in combat.but putting saids you are not allowed to fight back using other country's weapons in Russia long range missiles.unkraine have proved they are no push over.give them all the long range missiles they want to hit in side Russia hard .
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...