Scammed on Lordship Lane - not sure?
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
By David Peckham · Posted
I wouldn't like to speculate, Sue. Not my thing. Teddy Boy is your man on the ground for that sort of first-hand detail. It's six points for driving without insurance and six points for using a phone, so that's an automatic ban of at least six months. They're going to be practically uninsurable for a considerable period after that. So, nobody's hurt, a clearly crap driver is off the road for some time and the good burghers of SE22 get a lovely, shiny new post - probably paid for by the driver. Every cloud, and that. If only Franklins wasn't changing hands, Lordship Lane would be almost perfect. -
Was the driver still with it when the police arrived?
-
By Earl Aelfheah · Posted
Strange they've still not moved it. -
By David Peckham · Posted
An uninsured driver is still liable for any damage they've caused. The council can pursue them through the courts, or apply to the MIB (Motor Insurance Bureau) for compensation through their scheme for uninsured drivers. It's up to them if they want to do that, of course.
-
East Dulwich Forum
Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now