Jump to content

Recommended Posts

silverfox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>people like me who've got better things to do than queue

> up for hours for a couple of pork chops.


...Such as go on the internet and complain about queuing for pork chops?


I don't know how you fit it all in, I really don't...

During easter i took my little nephew and niece to the horniman to see the aquarium, all buggies were left in "parking" areas around the museum, made me smile as it looked like an enormous buggy show room.

A little girl came up and hugged kissed my surprised 18 month old niece by giving her a kiss and a hug, her mum rushed up and said, " sorry about that i dont know where she gets that from, its not me, it must be her nanny". Only in Dulwich :)

woofmarkthedog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Stop........I think small shops have a planning

> issue with access so 2 doors may not be possible

>

> Anyway think of the people queuing as an

> attractive "garnish" on LSL

>

> OK now go get 'em Gabbers

>

>

> *unleashes swarm of hornets....zzzzzzzz zzzz*


You may well be right woofmarkthedog and your point about garnish is interesting. That may explain why some idiot had the bright idea of having onion sellers outside WR a while back to further exacerbate the obstructive queuing. Thinking about it though, it may have been another marketing idea of WR to entertain the long-suffering customers in the queue.

I like the queue outside WR, it's one of the sights of the area and the parents of ED can start interesting and informative conversations with their children about rationing in WW2 and how people used to do this in butchers shops all the time.

Then take them home and show them episodes of Dad's Army, focussing on Jonesy's butcher shop.

Blimey, SM's choleric today, too much red meat perhaps?

silverfox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> woofmarkthedog Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Stop........I think small shops have a planning

> > issue with access so 2 doors may not be

> possible

> >

> > Anyway think of the people queuing as an

> > attractive "garnish" on LSL

> >

> > OK now go get 'em Gabbers

> >

> >

> > *unleashes swarm of hornets....zzzzzzzz zzzz*

>

> You may well be right woofmarkthedog and your

> point about garnish is interesting. That may

> explain why some idiot had the bright idea of

> having onion sellers outside WR a while back to

> further exacerbate the obstructive queuing.

> Thinking about it though, it may have been another

> marketing idea of WR to entertain the

> long-suffering customers in the queue.



Yeah but NICE ONOINS eh !



W**F

I think there is a genuine point behind BETSY555's rant - namely that certain middle-class parents over-indulge their children and allow them to disrupt other people. It's a shame that anyone who says this is instantly branded a reactionary, miserable child-hater. On the contrary, I think children brought up with boundaries and a sense of respect for others are happier and more well-balanced.


We seem to have a bizarre Jekyll-and-Hyde approach to kids in Britain - a basically child-unfriendly society where 'youths' are contantly demonised in the press combined with pressure to over-indulge your kids, treat them as mini-adults and cater to their every whim.


Other European countries do it so much better - children are welcomed in shops, restaurants and 'adult' environments but expected to behave, and generally speaking, they do!



I'm more inclined to think it's a LACK of red meat this week - I may well go and rectify that in the next 30 mins or so. Although silverfox's faux-concern about how WR customers could have better access is undermined by his constant subtext of "prats" and is not helping my disposition

James Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think there is a genuine point behind BETSY555's

> rant - namely that certain middle-class parents

> over-indulge their children and allow them to

> disrupt other people. It's a shame that anyone who

> says this is instantly branded a reactionary,

> miserable child-hater. On the contrary, I think

> children brought up with boundaries and a sense of

> respect for others are happier and more

> well-balanced.


The point may be a genuine one, but there are ways to go about saying such things without sounding like a miserable, moaning old git!

silverfox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> woofmarkthedog Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Stop........I think small shops have a planning

> > issue with access so 2 doors may not be

> possible

> >

> > Anyway think of the people queuing as an

> > attractive "garnish" on LSL

> >

> > OK now go get 'em Gabbers

> >

> >

> > *unleashes swarm of hornets....zzzzzzzz zzzz*

>

> You may well be right woofmarkthedog and your

> point about garnish is interesting. That may

> explain why some idiot had the bright idea of

> having onion sellers outside WR a while back to

> further exacerbate the obstructive queuing.

> Thinking about it though, it may have been another

> marketing idea of WR to entertain the

> long-suffering customers in the queue.



Why not go to another butcher.


Or don't.


I don't think WR have a 'marketing department'.


They are just a butchers.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> I'm more inclined to think it's a LACK of red meat

> this week - I may well go and rectify that in the

> next 30 mins or so. Although silverfox's

> faux-concern about how WR customers could have

> better access is undermined by his constant

> subtext of "prats" and is not helping my

> disposition



I'd allow a couple of hours if I were you Sean. Might be an idea to take a 'meaty' tome with you as well - Tolstoy's War and Peace perhaps

I suspect if WR had been able to buy the premises next door then the two-door option might have been pursued. But the pavement there is pretty wide anyway and there's no real obstruction. What used to get my goat was people who queued for various ATMs at right angles to the building, thereby truly blocking the pavement. Thankfully people in LL seem to be more civilised these days, and form a queue at the curb so that passers-by are not hindered. Anyway for a real obstruction you cannot beat the queue by Sparkes on a Saturday morning, because their van always parks by the narrowest part of the pavement on NCR. But hell, it's a popular shop in a popular market on a Saturday, so it's all part of the fun!
I think there is a genuine point behind BETSY555's rant - namely that certain middle-class parents over-indulge their children and allow them to disrupt other people. It's a shame that anyone who says this is instantly branded a reactionary, miserable child-hater.


Hmm. I was about to write a similar response and add that it's a strange day when someone can't offer an opinion without having a plethora of posters jumping down their throats - but then I re-read the OP and it was written so unpleasantly and with so many tiresome hackish generalisations that I thought I'd leave 'em to it. And I was surprised to see you join in the class war, James - surely over-indulged (in the sense of undisciplined, disrespectful) children of any background are a shame?

WONDERGIRL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm sure that most parents would prefer shopping

> on their own, but being a parent is a 24 hour a

> day 7 day a week job. London is London and if you

> want peace and quiet move out of London. You won't

> find less kids in the country though.



Um, at least outside of cities you also don't get people imposing their 'this is a family borough' values on a place either.


If you want lots of space for your kids and don't want the little darlings to be corrupted by the tewwible cwimes in the city I heartily recommend it.

James Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think there is a genuine point behind BETSY555's

> rant - namely that certain middle-class parents

> over-indulge their children and allow them to

> disrupt other people. It's a shame that anyone who

> says this is instantly branded a reactionary,

> miserable child-hater. On the contrary, I think

> children brought up with boundaries and a sense of

> respect for others are happier and more

> well-balanced.

>

> We seem to have a bizarre Jekyll-and-Hyde approach

> to kids in Britain - a basically child-unfriendly

> society where 'youths' are contantly demonised in

> the press combined with pressure to over-indulge

> your kids, treat them as mini-adults and cater to

> their every whim.

>

> Other European countries do it so much better -

> children are welcomed in shops, restaurants and

> 'adult' environments but expected to behave, and

> generally speaking, they do!


Agree with this.

Well behaved kids are usually always welcome anywhere, or at least they should be. I was in a certain cafe not too long ago and a dad had his little boy with him, probably about 3 years old. He allowed the boy to run amok while he sat and stared out the window. The little boy started pulling the skin (not petting) of well behaved dog who politely sitting in the cafe. I asked the chap to come and get his child as he was misbehaving. Guy got up, grabbed his child and left the cafe without saying anything to anyone. Could have been worse I suppose; he might have blamed the dog!

I support the rant to a degree. I have no problem with kids or parents per se but what drives me nuts is the fact that many people who have children seem to think it entitles them to disregard the comfort and wellbeing of others and confers upon them some sort of superior status. I think it owuld be a good idea for people to have to pass some sort of test before they have chldren. this would include, among other things, buggy steering skills, discipline protocols, noise control etc. If they fail the test they should be barred from procreation.

I agree.


There should also be an alcohol test. Anyone incapable of getting through a boozy evening without being polite and charming to others at all times, retaining full control of their bodily functions and making complete sense should be banned from drinking. If we're going to get all judgywudgy, why restrict it to parents? Let's ensure that everyone has to be perfect at all times, otherwise they will be taken outside and shot by the Superiority Police.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • V interesting ArchieCarlos.   The UK is #1 at blocking and delaying investment (per the article I linked to above).  This means we have pretty much the lowest gross fixed capital formation in the developed world and the economic results are there for all to see (this led to the nihilistic political environment that enabled Brexit which made things even worse). Some of this blocking and delaying is well intentioned and aimed at a better outcome but much of it a smokescreen to prevent any investment at all and is a money-spinner for consultants and lawyers. According to the FT the new Kent tunnel has cost £1.2bn so far even before construction starts of which £800m has been on consultants, planning and legal fees.  359,080 pages of documentation!  This does not compare favourably with much more complex tunneling projects in countries like Norway or Germany.
    • Hello We've been let down by our surveyor who didn't look at the loft as they said their ladder wasn't tall enough - we're about to exchange but are keen to check the loft/roof before! Does anyone near to Melbourne Grove have a tall ladder we could borrow for an hour tomorrow around 3?   Thanks so much!
    • Trump is driving a wedge between the UK and EU. 
    • I am delighted to hear the development was approved.  In my opinion, the UK is building far too little housing. And unless we build on green belts, the only solution is to increase the density of our cities, which is exactly what this scheme achieves.  Where I'm from (France), planning is generally looser and in my home city it's common to see single dwellings being razed to make way for a 5-6 story block of flats, even in city centres. Does it change the character of the local area? For sure! But I don't see another way to provide the supply to meet demand and provide ample supply of housing for a growing population. My personal experience is that in the UK, there is a lot more time spent on consultations, on achieving a perfect outcome for everyone. This results in generally better and more harmonious building than in France, but it makes things slower and more costly, with the need to coordinate many consultants.  It's interesting to compare France and the UK as they have similar populations and population growth, with an economy centred on a huge capital city. When you look at the number of houses/flats built in France and the UK over the past 10 years, the result is pretty striking. # France UK Difference 2023 298,100 150,370 -147,730 2022 392,100 182,070 -210,030 2021 410,000 177,160 -232,840 2020 368,800 129,440 -239,360 2019 387,700 153,000 -234,700 2018 401,200 168,610 -232,590 2017 434,700 164,110 -270,590 2016 370,000 155,150 -214,850 2015 341,000 148,150 -192,850 2014 336,900 140,760 -196,140 2013 357,900 124,790 -233,110 2012 382,300 101,020 -281,280 Total 4,480,700 1,794,630 -2,686,070 Average 373,392 149,553 -223,839 When HS1 was built, the French engineers (it was built with the French high-speed signalling) were surprised at how Brits wanted to "gold-plate" everything. The UK arguably has the best, most effective, more reliable, more well-equipped high-speed line in the world, but we've only got 68 miles of it and it cost 2.5 times what it cost the French to build a line extension at the same time.  In my view, there's no magic wand: just deciding who will be the losers. In France, people in established neighbourhoods my lose out as they see them change dramatically, while the new entrants benefit from a much higher supply of housing (and thus cheaper housing). In the UK, we give greater priority to preserving the lifestyle and amenity of the established dwellers over the new entrants who lose out as the supply is choked and prices are higher. A final point of comparison would be the price per square foot of property in Greater Paris is £467 while in Greater London it's £667 - 30% cheaper!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...