Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've just read that the O2 arena is the most popular venue in the world, selling more tickets than Madison Square Gardens.


Oh, how I remember how the the entire media slagged the Dome off relentlessly for not making money within minutes of it opening.


Now it does make loads of wonga, they're all silent!


:))

The Dome was built with LOttery money. It made no money during the embarrassing Millenium fiasco and was sold on, for a pittance, to O2. While therefore, in theory, there was no cost to the taxpayer the Lottery was always meant to be for "good causes" not political white elephants - there has thus been an opportunity cost to taxpayers of ?750m worth of real good causes that weren't funded.


I would agree that now however, the centre is a fine concert and exhibition spot - tho' Dylan's concert last Saturday was rather dire!

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No its not and you know it


I wonder if we looked at the mix of people buying lottery tickets whether we would find the contributions to the Lottery fund come from a poorer subsection of society than personal taxation in general?

Marmora Man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Dome was built with LOttery money. It made no

> money during the embarrassing Millenium fiasco and

> was sold on, for a pittance, to O2. While

> therefore, in theory, there was no cost to the

> taxpayer the Lottery was always meant to be for

> "good causes" not political white elephants -

> there has thus been an opportunity cost to

> taxpayers of ?750m worth of real good causes that

> weren't funded.

>

> I would agree that now however, the centre is a

> fine concert and exhibition spot - tho' Dylan's

> concert last Saturday was rather dire!



As I said above, it's already made more than the ?750 million it cost back in tax revenue and will continue making tax revenue for us. I propose that it never was a 'fiasco', it just wasn't given enough time. It was obvious (to me) that it would eventually work (i.e. generate money).

Why do people expect things to work IMMEDIATELY?!?



and if we did find that out so what? All anyone who buys a lottery ticket is interested in is winning dosh - they have no higher moral goal than that in the transaction so I'm not inclined to listen to them complain about where the money goes


The Dome exhibition was awful but I have always liked the building and think it an asset.

Sherwick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> As I said above, it's already made more than the

> ?750 million it cost back in tax revenue and will

> continue making tax revenue for us.


Who's this 'us' you speak of? Unless it makes revenue for 'us' in the same way that, say, BT does? (ie it doesn't)

Here's an offer: if someone would be kind enough to construct a ?750m marvel of engineering situated in one of the world's top cities, served by it's own brand new transport system and hand it over to me - for free - I'll do my level best to turn in some kind of profit.
I actually liked my trip to the Millenium Exhibition. Took my mum and dad. Saw the brilliant "squatting figure" by Ron Meuck and David Mach's wonderful mural on British life and of course, the Dome itself (and who, in all honesty, was not impressed by it?). And then saw the, not-exactly-to-my-taste, musical dance performance thingy which was rather akin to shows in the West End. And all for ?20.
I went, it was ok. We spent more time looking at the Thames Water rainwater collection system from the roof and the reverse osmosis system for cleaning the (brown!) ground water for use in the toilets and washrooms. It was quite ahead of its time really.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Public Transport Link in Paid for by taxpayer

> SHOCKER!!!!!!!

>

> A lot of happy citizens in that part of the world

> thanks to the tube extension there


Yeah, but that station only really serves the dome and it?s a bit bigger than what would be required if the dome wasn?t there.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> and if we did find that out so what? All anyone

> who buys a lottery ticket is interested in is

> winning dosh - they have no higher moral goal than

> that in the transaction so I'm not inclined to

> listen to them complain about where the money

> goes


That wasn't where I was going with it - general view is lottery tickets are more often bought by people with less spare cash, and when they started playing the lottery donations to charity went down - partly because the good cause element made them feel like they were still giving money to charity. Feels to me given charities were being deprived of donations the least the government could do is spend the money they collect wisely. Admittedly some charities aren't especially good at keeping admin costs low, but I doubt many make as much mess as was made of the Dome planning.

>

> The Dome exhibition was awful but I have always liked the building and think it an asset.


So do I, been to gigs there and think the new owners have done a good job with it - but that doesn't excuse shoddy project planning and poor budget control of the original build or lack of forward planning about what the space would be used for afterwards.


Oh well, hopefully lessons have been learned. From what I have heard as much if not more effort on the Olympic site build is going into thinking about how the area will be used after the event.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...