Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My daughter is travelling to the US this summer for around 3 months and I wondered if anyone had any advice on what the best option is for using her phone abroad. She's on Tesco Mobile and their overseas rates are punitive so she needs to get another SIM I think. Any advice on what the best option is ? I've seen a couple of recommendations on the MSE site but wondered if anyone had any direct useful experience that they could pass on.

Everything is easy in the US.

Cheapest I found was to use my iphone for inbound calls and wifi at restaraunts/libraries/hotels.

For US calls (if you want to use a phone as a .....phone) go to Walmart, Target or similar stores which are everywhere and buy a basic device for $14.99 + a card to top-up on calls.

that's one way. Others on here may have had different experiences.

Check out Three Mobile's Feel At Home scheme. It's free if you're on a contract or have payg where you have bought a monthly add on. Essentially, it is free roaming calls, texts, and data in the USA. On PAYG you only have to buy a ?10 add on each month to get it. Note though that the free calls and texts are to UK numbers, not local US numbers. But rEceiving calls and texts are free.


If you want to get a local US SIM card, not all of them work in British mobile phones, as they use a different network there (CDMA). One of the few networks that support UK phones (which run on a GSM network) is T-Mobile. You can get a SIM where for $30 a month you get quite a lot of texts, minutes, and data. But you can only get it once you're in the U.S.

Last time I was working out there, I got a prepaid T-mobile sim off amazon I think (might have been eBay), while I was still in the UK. Meant I could set up my phone ahead of time although think I had to complete the process once I landed. If you do this, use your normal card number, but a US address as your billing address. I used the hotel I was staying at for my first couple of nights. Obviously it shouldn't work, but it does. I then as above, got the something like $30 a month which gave you a month with enough texts, minutes and data to use your phone as you would here. A colleague did the same thing, but just walked into a t-mobile store once we were in the US which to be honest is probably a little less complicated and presumably you could pay in cash or use a card without requiring a local billing address. I lived over there for six years so would echo the advice about checking on network compatibility. Verizon is total no go, can't remember about the others but Tmobile worked fine with an iPhone.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...