Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I've noticed a growing trend of parents taking beers and other booze into the playground. Has anyone else spotted it?

They're not tramps with cans of spesh, in fact one of them I saw reminded me of someone famous out of a film. But it occurs to me that this is quite a dangerous practice. Regardless of the dangers of broken glass, it's very difficult to look after a toddler when you have a bottle of IPA in one hand so I can't help but feel this is tantamount to irresponsible parenting. Has anyone noticed and should we put signs up to discourage this sort of thing?

The playgroud is in the majority of Southwark where 'street drinking' is illegal under a Southwark bye law.

But is it causing a problem?

If you think it is then report it to the Police via 101 the no emergency phone number. I would counsel that it is unlikely to be a problem worth the police time.

I don't see how looking after a child with a beer in one hand is any harder than looking after a toddler with a bottle of water, or a cup of tea, or another child, in one hand is? I don't know, on a nice sunny afternoon or evening why not take a beer to the park? Lots of children in the park won't need handholding anyway, parents are there to just keep an eye on things. Probably not a great idea with very small ones, but again, no different to getting a coffee from the coffee van that's often parked up by GG playground.


It's not something I've ever spotted myself in my 5+ years of going to the playground, but I really wouldn't care less if I did see it, in fact I'd probably be annoyed that I didn't think of it myself.

I don't necessarily agree that having a drink while looking after kids is irresponsible. One beer on a sunny day isn't going to kill anyone. I don't think that drinking alcohol is something that needs to be hidden away from children. However, I would probably agree with a glass ban.
I agree that glass might be an issue, but otherwise I can't see how a beer is objectionable in those particular circumstances. It is certainly a lot less dangerous that hot coffee and it is a lot easier to juggle a kid with a cold can than with a hot cup of something.
Perhaps instead of seeing the beer as an issue the real issue lies with the children. Introducing a ban on drinking beer whilst looking after kids seems OTT, perhaps instead discouraging the culprits in bringing their children to the site would mean they could enjoy their beer more and pose less of a safety hazard. As an aside I hope it was Pale Ale and not Tenants Export.
I've done this before. With Hops Burns and Black round the corner, it's temping on a sunny day to enjoy a beer whilst the kids are playing. I'm talking a small can of beer btw, not downing 2 litres of Strongbow. It probably is a bit wrong - rest assured, I feel suitably admonished.

I agree with most posts here. It's certainly not a matter for police attention and yes, scolding coffee is certainly more dangerous than a nice cool beer.

Maybe they could extend the softer tarmac stuff a bit so there's no danger of the bottles breaking if they're dropped.

DearBBC Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree with most posts here. It's certainly not a

> matter for police attention and yes, scolding

> coffee is certainly more dangerous than a nice

> cool beer.

> Maybe they could extend the softer tarmac stuff a

> bit so there's no danger of the bottles breaking

> if they're dropped.


Scalding tea/ coffee dangerous ? Ok so lets not have babies and children in cafes.. ??


Tea and Coffee doesn't make you drunk.


I'm assuming parents are taking the children to the playground during the day.

It's a bit sad if they cannot survive half an hour in the park / playground without the need for a drink.


The drink / driving levels are being lowered because it has been said that even a single drink can impair

judgement and reactions.


..and it is illegal as James Barber has pointed out.


DulwichFox

We never used to worry about such stuff.


When I first lived in ED long before the GG playground was renovated with that 'fun' stuff - (like the new-fangled netting and high wire walk - and with soft tarmac, would you believe), there used to be 3 or 4 regular drinkers hanging out there for most of the day (Tennants Super, or equivalent thereof). They would pee against the wall by the entrance - that only added to their charm.


Of course, those were the good old days, before the blow-ins with their poncey ?1 coffees and their specialised micro-brewery beverages. It was sometimes a bit scary being shouted and spat at by a swearing hallucinating alkie, but we respected each other, and we understood the importance of 'community'. That was proper ED back then ; )

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fox, you are sounding pretty judgemental there.

> We're not (as far as I know) talking about Dads

> getting wasted while their children play.


I'm not being judgemental. Whether it's dads or mums .. It's illegal..


Not a good example in front of your kids AND other peoples kids whose parents may not approve..


It's about respect for other people which you don't seem to think is important.

That's something gone from our New E.D. Respect.


..Or is Respect something only Sad Miserable Old Gits have ?


DulwichFox

Dulwich Fox wrote:


"That's something gone from our New E.D. Respect.


..Or is Respect something only Sad Miserable Old Gits have ? "


Answer: If it's the sort that starts with a capital R - yes.


Oh and by the way, I'm pretty sure my 7 year old (and probably every other child of that age) wouldn't even know that in Southwark, drinking in public is illegal, so you needn't worry too much about people setting an example of illegality to children of the age that use the GG playground!

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Oh and by the way, I'm pretty sure my 7 year old

> (and probably every other child of that age)

> wouldn't even know that in Southwark, drinking in

> public is illegal, so you needn't worry too much

> about people setting an example of illegality to

> children of the age that use the GG playground!


And with an attitude like that it's not difficult to see how they are likely to grow up.


Teenagers being stopped by the Police for illicit public drinking will just say. "My mum & Dad used to do it"

and no one said anything.


Yes it would be nice to have a picnic in the park with a bottle of wine or a few chilled beers,

but who dictates who can and who can't. As long as they are of drinking age there cannot be any discrimination.


So as it stands there is no public drinking..


DulwichFox

sorry, is James saying that it's illegal to drink in a park? (not a playground specifically, but a park?) Really? I had no idea.


I take Miss Oi to the park in the early evening on occasion, as she's a bit of a night owl. I really don't see anything wrong with wandering down with a single bottle of Becks to enjoy in the evening sunshine in the park. And I very much doubt she takes the slightest notice of what I'm drinking.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...