Jump to content

Recommended Posts

aquarius moon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Palace of Peace?

>

> Nature's Grace, Blue Aquarius, incense, vegetarian

> food, love & peace. Still sounds wonderful.

>

> If I'd lived in ED back then, I know where I'd

> have been spending my time.


As if we couldn't have guessed from your name ;-)

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Doesn't this just translate to:

> 1. From my memory I reckon I had a great time back

> in the day.

> 2. You lot who haven't lived round here as long as

> me will never understand that.

> 3. Only I can really appreciate the way things

> were, once, according to my memory.

> 4. No matter how much you like ED at the moment,

> my memory tells me that it was better back in my

> day, according to my memory, regardless of who you

> are and what you know.

> 5. The best time has gone and all that's left is

> shit.

> 6. I am unable to move on, times have changed, but

> I cannot and will not adapt to it.

> 7. I can blurt-out whatever I like to talk-up the

> past / put-down the present, but you can't

> challenge my view, because you're not me and only

> I know the truth.

> 8. You're all wrong and I'm all right.

> 9. If you challenge me then you're a bully and

> part of a clique.

> 10 If you challenge me have no grounds to do so

> because you're not me.

> 11. Back to 1. And Repeat. Ad Infinitum.


Yes, nicely summarised

Getting old and reminiscing I guess it's just part of life. The fox and I tend to stray off on tangents because it makes us happy to talk about old times and faces we miss. It's not to belittle people today making their very own memories in different places. Not in the slightest.


Louisa.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Palace of Peace... gullible fools blindly

> following a religious cult... it sounds like

> everything that is wrong with the world.




I know/knew quite a few people who were into things like that in the seventies/eighties, and none of them were gullible, or fools.


I don't think whatever is "wrong with the world" has anything to do with those people who are seeking peace. Far from it.


Only just seen this thread, BTW, and what a load of boring bollocks.


Things change. Get used to it. If you can't get used to it and you don't like it, move somewhere else, don't waste your life criticising the people who do like living here :)

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know/knew quite a few people who were into

> things like that in the seventies/eighties, and

> none of them were gullible, or fools.

>

> I don't think whatever is "wrong with the world"

> has anything to do with those people who are

> seeking peace. Far from it.


Just to be clear. Are we talking about this guy? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prem_Rawat


You're right, all sounds perfectly reasonable to me.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Palace of Peace... gullible fools blindly

> > following a religious cult... it sounds like

> > everything that is wrong with the world.

>

>

>

> I know/knew quite a few people who were into

> things like that in the seventies/eighties, and

> none of them were gullible, or fools.

>

> I don't think whatever is "wrong with the world"

> has anything to do with those people who are

> seeking peace. Far from it.

>

> Only just seen this thread, BTW, and what a load

> of boring bollocks.

>

> Things change. Get used to it. If you can't get

> used to it and you don't like it, move somewhere

> else, don't waste your life criticising the people

> who do like living here :)


Sue.. I seem to remember on more than one occasion yourself talking about moving somewhere else..

Why might that be if you like it here so much... ??


Many people already have moved elsewhere.


Foxy

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> FJDGoose Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Dulwich Fox is looking old and tired - I think

> he should be put out of his misery.

>

> Fixed that for you.


Old ? getting there .. Every day you get a little bit older and a little bit wiser.


Tired ? Never been fitter..


Why don't you post your mug shot up on here.. ??


In fact perhaps a few more should do the same..


Foxy

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Why don't you post your mug shot up on here.. ??

>

> In fact perhaps a few more should do the same..

>

> Foxy


What *Bob* said but there you go.


http://i1369.photobucket.com/albums/ag237/jahlushhead/67bc86e1e6ef4d255c328b44cd0f9bd4_zpsgveaxhkz.jpg

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I know/knew quite a few people who were into

> > things like that in the seventies/eighties, and

> > none of them were gullible, or fools.

> >

> > I don't think whatever is "wrong with the

> world"

> > has anything to do with those people who are

> > seeking peace. Far from it.

>

> Just to be clear. Are we talking about this guy?

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prem_Rawat

>

> You're right, all sounds perfectly reasonable to

> me.




I've got absolutely no idea who the guy in question was. Never heard of this Peace Palace in East Dulwich before.


I was talking in general terms, hence my use of the expression "things like that".


Maharishi, for example, and Transcendental Meditation, which a lot of people were into at that time, including The Beatles.


I'm not quite clear why being attracted to inner peace should be damned as being "everything that's wrong with the world".


I'm sure some of these so-called gurus were charlatans and yes I expect some of the people who followed them were gullible. It doesn't make all of them charlatans, and it doesn't make all their followers gullible. No more than Christians, for example.

Sue - quite obviously I have no problem with peace (or even meditation if that's your bag) but I do have a problem with people peddling rubbish, and the sheep-like, unquestioning nature of some people who seem to be attracted to these supposedly charistmatic people.


No point discussing the pros and cons of the whole "spiritual" thing, since you're clearly more open to the idea than I am, and we won't change each others minds on that any time soon.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Doesn’t seem that simple   according to fullfact that’s a net figure   ” The £21.9 billion was a net figure. Gross additional pressures totalling £35.3 billion were identified by the Treasury, and approximately £13.4 billion of these pressures were then offset by a combination of reserve funds and other allowances. The additional pressures identified were as follows: 2024-25 public sector pay awards (£9.4bn) ”   I don’t think Labour have set expectation that changing government cures all the ills. In fact some people on here criticise them for saying exactly opposite “vote for us we’re not them but nothing will change because global issues”   I think they are too cautious across many areas. They could have been more explicit before election but such is the countries media and electorate that if they were we would now be stuck with sunak/badenoch/someone else with the 14 years of baggage of their government and infighting  the broad strokes of this government are essentially along right lines  also loving ckarkson today “ Clarkson: Your claim that I bought a farm to avoid taxes is false and irresponsible.  BBC: It’s your own claim.  Clarkson: What’s that got to do with anything?” and by loving I mean “loathing as much as I ever have”    
    • BBC and the IFS https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2e12j4gz0o From BBC Verify:   Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank said Reeves "may be overegging the £22bn black hole". What about the rest of the £22bn? The government published a breakdown, external of how it had got from the Treasury's £9.5bn shortfall in February to the £22bn "black hole". It said that there was another £7bn between February and the actual Budget in March, as departments found out about new spending pressures and the government spent more on the NHS and the Household Support Fund There was a final £5.6bn between then and late July, which includes almost a month when Labour was in power. That was largely caused by increases in public sector pay. It was the Labour government that accepted the recommendations of the Pay Review Bodies (PRBs), but they said that the previous government should have budgeted for more than a 2% increase in public sector pay. Prof Stephen Millard from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research think tank told BBC Verify: "The 'political' question is whether you would count this as part of the fiscal black hole or not. If you do, then you get to the £22bn figure; if not, then you’re left with around £12.5bn to £13.5bn." It isn't this at all. When you run on an agenda of change and cleaning up politics and you put all of the eggs of despair in a basket at the door of the previous government you better hope you have a long honeymoon period to give you time to deliver the change you have promised. Look at the NHS, before the election it was all...it's broken because of 14 years of Tory incompetence and the implication was that Labour could fix is quickly. Then Wes Streeting (who is one of the smarter political cabinet members and is clearly able to play the long game) started talking about the need to change the NHS before the election - he talked about privatising parts of it (much to the annoyance of the left). He was being pragmatic because the only magic wand that is going to fix the NHS is massive reform - it's broken and has been for decades and throwing money at it has just papered over the cracks. Now Labour talk about the NHS needing 10 years of healing for there to be real difference and people are saying....what..... Words in opposition are easy; actions in government are a lot harder and I fear that given the structural issues caused by Covid, the energy crisis, the war in Ukraine (and now maybe a massive US/China trade war if Trump isn't bluffing) that we are heading to constant one-term governments. I don't think there was a government (and correct me if I am wrong) that survived Covid and in a lot of countries since Covid they have had regular government change (I think what is playing out in the US with them voting Trump in is reflective of the challenges all countries face). Labour massively over-egged the 14 years of hurt (who could blame them) but it is going to make things a lot tougher for them as they have set the expectation that changing government cures all the ills and as we have seen in the first 90 days of their tenure that is very much not the case. Completely agree but the big risk if Farage. If Labour don't deliver what they promised or hit "working people" then the populists win - it's happening everywhere. Dangerous, dangerous times ahead and Labour have to get it right - for all our sakes - no matter what party we support. P.S. Lammy is also one of the better Labour front-bench folks - he just is suffering from Labour's inability to think far enough ahead to realise that some posts might come back to haunt you...but in his defence did anyone really think Americans would be daft enough to vote him in again....;-)
    • My cat has been missing since Sunday evening 17th November he is British short hair male cat colour black with grey stripes. medium to large in size. He is easily identified by a large tooth missing on the top left of his mouth.  He lives in Upland Road just near the roundabout at Underhill Road. His name is Jack but he  only answers to Puss Puss please call me on 0208 299 2275 if you see him.   thank you Linda  
    • I think this could go on endlessly, so I suggest we finish it here!  But why don't you  track down the makers of the sign? Which hopefully has amused a lot of people, as well as brightening my bus journey. Tell  them that their directions to Dulwich are not only wrong, but they do not seem to know where the "real" Dulwich is 🤣 I'm sure they will be delighted 🤣  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...