Jump to content

Recommended Posts

KK what's different about you banging on about how crap the area was twenty years or more ago with your rant above about pervy salesmen in clothes shops, avoided pubs and no-one visiting. All of which (as I'm sure you know) isn't the entire truth. And me saying it's not all rosey now either?


Quids what unpleasant labels have I put on anyone in this thread? I've not singled out any particular group of people at all. I made an observation that people come here to spend time in average restaurants, I don't think that's entirely untrue. Some people have and will continue to do that, because they believe articles in magazines and estate agent articles singing the praises of a pretty average London suburb. I am sorry if I come over as "chippy", but I can assure you I have no insecurities or feelings of inferiority at all. Just pointing the obvious.


Louisa.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


dead on a

weekend night because the pubs were rough

(Foresters anybody) and nobody wanted to visit ED

for a night out.


I contend that ED

was invariably a shitehole, 'in need of

improvement


Well I'm not rough and I used the Foresters. It was a bit rough round the edges and it was not

important that people did not travel from Putney to drink there.


I had some good nights there with good people. There was the occasional scrap, over in 30 seconds.

Nothing has changed on that front at The Bishop which also has had a few more serious flare ups.


As to E.D. being a Shithole.. Yes it was...


But it was OUR Shithole..


East Dulwich was err? East Dulwich.. Not the pretentious place it has become..


DulwichFox

Wow, just caught up on this. Couple of observations.


ED has never had a load of nail shops and fast food places.


K&W has never been the best kebab shop in the area, Yilmaz kicked it's arse, and then Hizar took over and did the same.


Foxy definitely should sell up and move somewhere that makes him happy (not Penge).


The Bishop is shit.


The Evening Standard is a pointless rag.

ED was never a shit hole as such, but it was exceedingly non descript and after Sainsburys opened, for a short while at least, fairly down trodden. That new places started to open and the area managed to reinvent itself a little is no bad thing.


My previous post btw was a little mischievous, but I am (like many others I'm sure) getting bored of this whole debate.

???? you forgot 'sanctimonious'. But otherwise, I agree - the endless repetition has become boring in the extreme.


???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Speaking in riddles again quids? And people are

> > supposedly bored of me and to a lesser extent

> > foxy, for speaking the truth, whilst remaining

> > happy confident and well rounded individuals. I

> > rest my case.

> >

> > Louisa.

>

>

> I am not sure taking out your insecurities and

> stereotyping everyone whose moved here in the past

> twenty years under lazy unpleasant labels is

> either truth telling or the sign of a well rounded

> individual to be honest but all you come over as

> nowadays is boring and immensely chippy and quite

> unpleasant to be honest but you martyr on.....

Otta no-ones calling ED a shitehole (I'm not anyway), I was including the list of descriptions that I invariably here on EDF.

I've been here 25 yrs and loved every minute.

Things change, thank God. Otherwise we'd still be taking a bucket to the nearest stream (down by the roundabout want it ?) for our water.

However, some people grow old and embrace change, others get stressed by it and deny it's right to occur.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wow, just caught up on this. Couple of

> observations.

>

> ED has never had a load of nail shops and fast

> food places.

>

> K&W has never been the best kebab shop in the

> area, Yilmaz kicked it's arse, and then Hizar took

> over and did the same.

>

> Foxy definitely should sell up and move somewhere

> that makes him happy (not Penge).

>

> The Bishop is shit.

>

> The Evening Standard is a pointless rag.


http://thumbs.newschoolers.com/index.php?src=http://fim.413chan.net/fic/src/132597704176-Clap.gif&size=400x1000

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But I take exception to people saying ED used to

> be a shithole. It was never that.




Agree with all of that Otta, I used to work in The Forresters and only ever saw a handful of scraps in 4 years.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I'm not looking for happiness and I'm going

> nowhere.




So you actually enjoy living somewhere that you don't like? Because let's be honest, you really don't like ED anymore. You might say it's the people and businesses that you don't like, but for better or worse, those things ARE the area.


I've never hidden the fact that for me ED had gone a wee bit too far in the last two or three years, but that's just me, I'm still fond of the old girl. But for you foxy it's just relentless negativity.


And yet you're not interested in moving somewhere more like the ED you used to love.

Don't get me wrong, some of the changes are for the better. I love the extra pedestrian crossings on LL just for starters. But let's not get carried away and start saying it's the new this or the new that. Otta I've considered a move a few times, StraferJack knows all about my mission to find a two up/two down in the Home Counties. I just love the convenience of this place.


If we were refering to crap dangerous areas in the 80s and 90s I think ED would have been way down any crime hotspot lists, Peckham however...


Louisa.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > I'm not looking for happiness and I'm going

> > nowhere.

>

>

>

> So you actually enjoy living somewhere that you

> don't like? Because let's be honest, you really

> don't like ED anymore. You might say it's the

> people and businesses that you don't like, but for

> better or worse, those things ARE the area.

>

> I've never hidden the fact that for me ED had gone

> a wee bit too far in the last two or three years,

> but that's just me, I'm still fond of the old

> girl. But for you foxy it's just relentless

> negativity.

>

> And yet you're not interested in moving somewhere

> more like the ED you used to love.


I like living here. That's why I stay here.

I do not feel the need to continually harp on about the things in E.D. I do like.


If I'm ill I go to the Doctor.


I don't go to the Doctor to let him/her know when I am well.


Simple as that.


Foxy

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ah, so you just object to people saying on a

> public forum that they LIKE things.

>

> They may only say they DON'T like things.

>

> I get it.


Don't talk crap... and no. you don't get it. you are just trying to sound clever.

People can say what ever they like... when ever they like. providing it complies to Forum rules.


Sits back and awaits the usual sarky comments I.E. " Thank you for your go ahead Sir Fox " from we all know who.


But I don't have inclination to post on here every time I have a cup of tea or a donut (I don't actually eat donuts)


So I post about things I feel strongly about.


DF

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If we were refering to crap dangerous areas in the

> 80s and 90s I think ED would have been way down

> any crime hotspot lists, Peckham however...

>

> Louisa.



And parts of Brockley were proper rough. New Cross always had some interesting characters and loads of squats.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Especially Brockley Cross (by the two mini

> roundabouts). Much tamer these days.

>

> Louisa.


Yep...


I used to drink/ work in The Wickham Arms Upper Brockley rd back in the early eighties.


Used to get my Kebab on Brockley Cross and get a cab from Duke Cars where I was affectionately known as 'Dulwich' .


I was rolled there (Brockley Cross) one night and my Keys and Credit cards taken.

Went to Brockley Nick where the Police told me they knew who might be involved and gave me a lift home.


I usually had no problems and wasn't hurt. Three guys just went through my pockets. No mobile phones back then.


Foxy

I go upto Brockley quite a bit (love the caf up there on the parade opposite second hand car dealership). With the overground addition and the good housing stock the changes in the last five years have been fairly rapid and sustained. Deptford and New Cross seem the same to me, and I do like that about the area.


Louisa.

KK that's the trouble a lot of the atmosphere has gone from local pubs now. I'm not saying aggro is ideal, but it does add to the character of a venue if you get a few bruiser locals glued to the bar monitoring and intimidating non-regulars. Surely that's half the charm? Id rather that than a bunch of people not talking to anyone.


Louisa.

Even used to happen in The Plough in the 80's


Was the regular floorshow and scrap.. Just a bit of light Cabaret.


Same as the Foresters. Always the same people. Locals who I knew so they did not do me any harm.


No one really go hurt..


Guy on the piano stopped playing and the landlord took down the mirror behind the bar.

Like the OK Corral.. Over in minutes then everyone just carried on drinking.


There was Mr Biscuit who was elderly gentleman who fed us .. biscuits.


The place died when it became the Bishop.


Foxy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Doesn’t seem that simple   according to fullfact that’s a net figure   ” The £21.9 billion was a net figure. Gross additional pressures totalling £35.3 billion were identified by the Treasury, and approximately £13.4 billion of these pressures were then offset by a combination of reserve funds and other allowances. The additional pressures identified were as follows: 2024-25 public sector pay awards (£9.4bn) ”   I don’t think Labour have set expectation that changing government cures all the ills. In fact some people on here criticise them for saying exactly opposite “vote for us we’re not them but nothing will change because global issues”   I think they are too cautious across many areas. They could have been more explicit before election but such is the countries media and electorate that if they were we would now be stuck with sunak/badenoch/someone else with the 14 years of baggage of their government and infighting  the broad strokes of this government are essentially along right lines  also loving ckarkson today “ Clarkson: Your claim that I bought a farm to avoid taxes is false and irresponsible.  BBC: It’s your own claim.  Clarkson: What’s that got to do with anything?” and by loving I mean “loathing as much as I ever have”    
    • BBC and the IFS https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2e12j4gz0o From BBC Verify:   Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank said Reeves "may be overegging the £22bn black hole". What about the rest of the £22bn? The government published a breakdown, external of how it had got from the Treasury's £9.5bn shortfall in February to the £22bn "black hole". It said that there was another £7bn between February and the actual Budget in March, as departments found out about new spending pressures and the government spent more on the NHS and the Household Support Fund There was a final £5.6bn between then and late July, which includes almost a month when Labour was in power. That was largely caused by increases in public sector pay. It was the Labour government that accepted the recommendations of the Pay Review Bodies (PRBs), but they said that the previous government should have budgeted for more than a 2% increase in public sector pay. Prof Stephen Millard from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research think tank told BBC Verify: "The 'political' question is whether you would count this as part of the fiscal black hole or not. If you do, then you get to the £22bn figure; if not, then you’re left with around £12.5bn to £13.5bn." It isn't this at all. When you run on an agenda of change and cleaning up politics and you put all of the eggs of despair in a basket at the door of the previous government you better hope you have a long honeymoon period to give you time to deliver the change you have promised. Look at the NHS, before the election it was all...it's broken because of 14 years of Tory incompetence and the implication was that Labour could fix is quickly. Then Wes Streeting (who is one of the smarter political cabinet members and is clearly able to play the long game) started talking about the need to change the NHS before the election - he talked about privatising parts of it (much to the annoyance of the left). He was being pragmatic because the only magic wand that is going to fix the NHS is massive reform - it's broken and has been for decades and throwing money at it has just papered over the cracks. Now Labour talk about the NHS needing 10 years of healing for there to be real difference and people are saying....what..... Words in opposition are easy; actions in government are a lot harder and I fear that given the structural issues caused by Covid, the energy crisis, the war in Ukraine (and now maybe a massive US/China trade war if Trump isn't bluffing) that we are heading to constant one-term governments. I don't think there was a government (and correct me if I am wrong) that survived Covid and in a lot of countries since Covid they have had regular government change (I think what is playing out in the US with them voting Trump in is reflective of the challenges all countries face). Labour massively over-egged the 14 years of hurt (who could blame them) but it is going to make things a lot tougher for them as they have set the expectation that changing government cures all the ills and as we have seen in the first 90 days of their tenure that is very much not the case. Completely agree but the big risk if Farage. If Labour don't deliver what they promised or hit "working people" then the populists win - it's happening everywhere. Dangerous, dangerous times ahead and Labour have to get it right - for all our sakes - no matter what party we support. P.S. Lammy is also one of the better Labour front-bench folks - he just is suffering from Labour's inability to think far enough ahead to realise that some posts might come back to haunt you...but in his defence did anyone really think Americans would be daft enough to vote him in again....;-)
    • My cat has been missing since Sunday evening 17th November he is British short hair male cat colour black with grey stripes. medium to large in size. He is easily identified by a large tooth missing on the top left of his mouth.  He lives in Upland Road just near the roundabout at Underhill Road. His name is Jack but he  only answers to Puss Puss please call me on 0208 299 2275 if you see him.   thank you Linda  
    • I think this could go on endlessly, so I suggest we finish it here!  But why don't you  track down the makers of the sign? Which hopefully has amused a lot of people, as well as brightening my bus journey. Tell  them that their directions to Dulwich are not only wrong, but they do not seem to know where the "real" Dulwich is 🤣 I'm sure they will be delighted 🤣  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...