Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thing is, though, that some people use 'chav' to describe what daizie is saying in the post above, but on first glance - so for people in a pub, or on a street. They're assuming that the people are doing all of those things but based on the way they dress, or how they sound. And that's snobbery plain and simple. So for me, that's when calling someone a chav is out of order.
Council House Adult Vacant


Not sure where this is from, I had heard "council Housing and Violent" equally I'm not sure where that came from, and whether it's accurate.


I have used the word chav on occasion, so don't want to get on my high horse about it. However, when I use it (having first heard it about 2004), it's to describe some knob boy racer with a load of bling (and probably a fair few quid).


These days, it seems to be more directed at a certain demographic "underclass" if you will, and that it when it starts to become nasty.

"its a great word , saves time and explaination"


Sure, that's how prejudice works. It characterises and dehumanises someone by classifying them.


It's all about intent, chavtastic is a celebration and unlikely to draw fire.


Don't get me wrong, I'm not above using terms like these, but when I do most of my colleagues will tender a reproachful glance as they're as aware as I am that I've been lazy and nasty.


There undoubtedly is a sub-culture of people who have Kate Moss posters on their wall, but I'd only christen someone with that sobriquet if I was being vindictive.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Can anyone recommend a good Dermatologist for male teens.   Getting nowhere with the NHS so need to speed up research and treatment.  Thanks in advance. 
    • It's not as bad as cigarette smoking. Where did you get that information from?
    • I haven't watched/read the links yet,  but I just got this email this morning: You’re receiving this email because you signed the petition: “Limit the sale of fireworks to those running local council approved events only”. Dear *** Parliament debated the petition you signed – “Limit the sale of fireworks to those running local council approved events only” Watch the debate: https://www.youtube.com/live/G1ntVoBByDE Read the transcript: https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-01-19/debates/C0AE7A79-B8C1-4E33-8CB7-A9AAD98B62E6/SaleOfFireworks Read the research: https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn05704/ The petition: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/732559 Thanks, The Petitions Team House of Commons   ETA: Well. I read a large part of the very lengthy  transcript of the debate, but when I skipped to the end, it seems there were no action points. I am not familiar with parliamentary debates. What happens now ? Is that it? Is there some minister who shoves it somewhere near the bottom of their in tray (old school methods) where it will never see the light of day again? It seems like there have been previous similar petitions going back years, and still  nothing has changed.
    • So why are/were they "real"? Does the word have a different meaning in  estate agent speak?  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...