Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello


Does anyone else find litter and the smell of food on the bus disgusting? If so please sign my campaign im sending to TFL.

If been watching people suck chicken bones drop them on floor and wipe hands on seats of the new number 12 bus and tonight watched this lovely lady who found it completely normal to peel an egg onto the floor.


I find is gross and unnecessary, many other cities have this ban in place already. If you agree please sign

https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/ban-eating-on-public-transport


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Friends,


I just created the petition "Ban Eating on Public Transport" and wanted to ask if you could add your name too.


This campaign means a lot to me and the more support we can get behind it, the better chance we have of succeeding. You can read more and sign the petition here:


https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/ban-eating-on-public-transport


Thank you!


Karen


P.S. Can you also take a moment to share the petition with others? It's really easy ? all you need to do is forward this email or share this link on Facebook or Twitter:


https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/ban-eating-on-public-transport

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/59343-ban-eating-campaign/
Share on other sites

Did you say anything at the time? I doubt a petition will work, even though I share your concerns. It is much better to tackle it at source. (I have done it myself, so I am not asking you to do something I haven't done.)

Just say to the offender "Please don't do that. Take your rubbish with you." Yeah, you may feel a bit of prat and you may get a bit of abuse but at least you will have done something.

Must say one thing I really can't stand is when there's someone sat behind me on the bus, or in front, stuffing their face with a greasy takeaway, munching away & the smell of it does makes me gag. I think it's so rude & inconsiderate to other passengers. I've seen no eating etc stickers on buses, not sure about other public transport, but a lot of people still don't take any notice. Bus driver doesn't kick them off or anything as a conductor might have done back in the day - perhaps there should be a fine as deterant?

I really don't see how this can work. Yes, people eating smelly takeaways on the bus is horrible, but you would also be penalising those eating, I don't know, a croissant or a cheese roll. I've given my young daughter inoffensive food on the bus many times, if a journey has taken longer than expected and she's getting hungry and whingey.


Unfortunately some people are just anti-social, inconsiderate twats. And how on earth would this be enforced? There are no conductors and bus drivers have got enough to do without dealing with this.

Some of us have lives, busy lives and sometimes busy people have to eat on the bus, or when they are rushing from one appointment to the other. Sometimes some people have medical issues and need to eat at certain times of the day, sometimes that time is when you are on the bus. Or train. The OP needs to hop off their sanctimonious high horse and live in the real world.


Tackling a litter problem... Now that's a whole different matter.

I admit to sometimes eating a sandwich on the bus. My job often involves travelling around London and elsewhere and I am aware I cannot arrive at someone's home, hospital or care home eating, or even knowing where I can purchase food when I get there. As a diabetic, I cannot go long periods of time without something filling like a roll or sandwich. I always take my rubbish home

Salsaboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Work a bit harder and buy a car then you won't

> have to get on the bus.


I hoe that wss a sarcastic comment... given the impossibility of parking in central London which is where most people work.


Anyway, on the point of banning eating on buses - I just don't think it's realistic. I've eaten on buses plenty of times when short of time / very hungry after a long day at work. Admittedly it's cold, non messy food and I take my litter with me, so I doubt it is bothering anyone too much. Anyway, I see so few people eating hot greasy food that it's simply not worth the inconvenience of being banned from eating myself to stop the inconsiderate eaters.


You could try introducing fines for dropping litter - but who is going to police it?

Like cedges and panda said... sometimes you just need to eat on the go. Personally I try to avoid the bus, but I do eat on the train now and again. Can understand the dislike of particularly smelly or greasy food but maybe not practical to draw a distinction.


BTW - completely agree that the egg lady is disgusting... well done for collecting evidence.

There is no NEED to eat on the go, unless you have a blood sugar problem. There is only DESIRE to do so. Nobody needs to peel an egg and drop the shell on the floor on the 12; nobody needs to scoff fried food on the short distance between London Bridge and Peckham Rye.

Long distance trains - the ones that have trolleys and a bar etc. - are the place to eat "on the go". Commuter trips are definitely not.

The buses do have signs asking people not to put their feet on the seats and not to eat pungent foods etc. Some people just ignore them. You can't always legislate for people being inconsiderate.

Generally, i don't mind eating on the bus as long as people don't make a mess / take their crap with them.

se22cat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Whenever I get on an (inevitably packed) 484 and

> an inconsiderate dickhead or trio of them enter

> then proceed to slurp on Chickenshop fodder or

> Saltfish I wish the Peckham Terminator would warp

> in and, well, terminate the vermin.



The Peckham Terminator? The racist guy who kicked the No 37 door in? Really?

Cedges Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Some of us have lives, busy lives and sometimes

> busy people have to eat on the bus, or when they

> are rushing from one appointment to the other.

> Sometimes some people have medical issues and need

> to eat at certain times of the day, sometimes that

> time is when you are on the bus. Or train. The OP

> needs to hop off their sanctimonious high horse

> and live in the real world.

>

> Tackling a litter problem... Now that's a whole

> different matter.



^^^ This.



People chucking litter on the floor of the bus, and / or putting their feet on seats is anti social, and should be tackled. But a blanket ban on eating is ridiculous.

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is no NEED to eat on the go, unless you have

> a blood sugar problem. There is only DESIRE to do

> so.




Incorrect.


Some people have jobs where they are on the go all day, going from apointment to appointment. No one has the "desire" to eat on the bus, who the hell would choose the bus as an ideal place for a snack? Some people grab a bite between appoontments because they need to eat, end of.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Doesn’t seem that simple   according to fullfact that’s a net figure   ” The £21.9 billion was a net figure. Gross additional pressures totalling £35.3 billion were identified by the Treasury, and approximately £13.4 billion of these pressures were then offset by a combination of reserve funds and other allowances. The additional pressures identified were as follows: 2024-25 public sector pay awards (£9.4bn) ”   I don’t think Labour have set expectation that changing government cures all the ills. In fact some people on here criticise them for saying exactly opposite “vote for us we’re not them but nothing will change because global issues”   I think they are too cautious across many areas. They could have been more explicit before election but such is the countries media and electorate that if they were we would now be stuck with sunak/badenoch/someone else with the 14 years of baggage of their government and infighting  the broad strokes of this government are essentially along right lines  also loving ckarkson today “ Clarkson: Your claim that I bought a farm to avoid taxes is false and irresponsible.  BBC: It’s your own claim.  Clarkson: What’s that got to do with anything?” and by loving I mean “loathing as much as I ever have”    
    • BBC and the IFS https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2e12j4gz0o From BBC Verify:   Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank said Reeves "may be overegging the £22bn black hole". What about the rest of the £22bn? The government published a breakdown, external of how it had got from the Treasury's £9.5bn shortfall in February to the £22bn "black hole". It said that there was another £7bn between February and the actual Budget in March, as departments found out about new spending pressures and the government spent more on the NHS and the Household Support Fund There was a final £5.6bn between then and late July, which includes almost a month when Labour was in power. That was largely caused by increases in public sector pay. It was the Labour government that accepted the recommendations of the Pay Review Bodies (PRBs), but they said that the previous government should have budgeted for more than a 2% increase in public sector pay. Prof Stephen Millard from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research think tank told BBC Verify: "The 'political' question is whether you would count this as part of the fiscal black hole or not. If you do, then you get to the £22bn figure; if not, then you’re left with around £12.5bn to £13.5bn." It isn't this at all. When you run on an agenda of change and cleaning up politics and you put all of the eggs of despair in a basket at the door of the previous government you better hope you have a long honeymoon period to give you time to deliver the change you have promised. Look at the NHS, before the election it was all...it's broken because of 14 years of Tory incompetence and the implication was that Labour could fix is quickly. Then Wes Streeting (who is one of the smarter political cabinet members and is clearly able to play the long game) started talking about the need to change the NHS before the election - he talked about privatising parts of it (much to the annoyance of the left). He was being pragmatic because the only magic wand that is going to fix the NHS is massive reform - it's broken and has been for decades and throwing money at it has just papered over the cracks. Now Labour talk about the NHS needing 10 years of healing for there to be real difference and people are saying....what..... Words in opposition are easy; actions in government are a lot harder and I fear that given the structural issues caused by Covid, the energy crisis, the war in Ukraine (and now maybe a massive US/China trade war if Trump isn't bluffing) that we are heading to constant one-term governments. I don't think there was a government (and correct me if I am wrong) that survived Covid and in a lot of countries since Covid they have had regular government change (I think what is playing out in the US with them voting Trump in is reflective of the challenges all countries face). Labour massively over-egged the 14 years of hurt (who could blame them) but it is going to make things a lot tougher for them as they have set the expectation that changing government cures all the ills and as we have seen in the first 90 days of their tenure that is very much not the case. Completely agree but the big risk if Farage. If Labour don't deliver what they promised or hit "working people" then the populists win - it's happening everywhere. Dangerous, dangerous times ahead and Labour have to get it right - for all our sakes - no matter what party we support. P.S. Lammy is also one of the better Labour front-bench folks - he just is suffering from Labour's inability to think far enough ahead to realise that some posts might come back to haunt you...but in his defence did anyone really think Americans would be daft enough to vote him in again....;-)
    • My cat has been missing since Sunday evening 17th November he is British short hair male cat colour black with grey stripes. medium to large in size. He is easily identified by a large tooth missing on the top left of his mouth.  He lives in Upland Road just near the roundabout at Underhill Road. His name is Jack but he  only answers to Puss Puss please call me on 0208 299 2275 if you see him.   thank you Linda  
    • I think this could go on endlessly, so I suggest we finish it here!  But why don't you  track down the makers of the sign? Which hopefully has amused a lot of people, as well as brightening my bus journey. Tell  them that their directions to Dulwich are not only wrong, but they do not seem to know where the "real" Dulwich is 🤣 I'm sure they will be delighted 🤣  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...