Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I agree with Sue - there is nothing nicer than sitting in a sunny beer garden with a pint or a large glass of wine - no food required or needed.


I think SteveT is thinking of quite a narrow band of peoople (ie not older or poorer people who can't AFFORD to go out to eat - not students or young people who hate to let food get in the way of a good drink up - and not people who just want a DRINK in a pub)

I don't think SteveT has it wrong at all - I think he is essentially correct on this


If the theory is that some pubs just concentrate on drink and ignore the fripperies, catering for the less well off who just want a drink, the question has to be "where are the poor people to keep these places in business?". Because they don't appear to be in the pubs which don't do food - or at least not many of them and certainly not enough of them

Well, much as I dislike pedantry, and so rarely indulge, ST and SMG are not in fact on the money with this one.


We're drinking more than ever (detailed report attached)... litres of alcohol per head per year:


1960 - 5.57

1970 - 7.00

1980 - 9.25

1990 - 9.28

2000 - 10.18

2004 - 11.20


I'm sure that Pubs could get extra money by offering a slightly more for non-drinkers, but we are drinking more and more.

But no-one is disputing (or at least I'm not) that we as a country are drinking more - it's just that that fact isn't closely connected with booze-only pubs suffering.


Most of the busy pubs serve food (and a lot more alcohol)

Most of the quiet pubs serve just booze (to fewer people)

my thoughts only on what makes a pub sucessful (hopefully)


good range of beers , wines and spirits


good range of alcohol free drinks ( hot and cold)


some food option ( different offers for different pubs)


good sports coverage ( I only run sports pubs so have no real alternative to this )


But the main thing that will get customers coming back is GOOD STAFF !


yes I shouted that bit out , you can get all the products right but useless , inept, grumpy , bored , barstaff will lose more customers than lack of food or entertaiment.


anyway , thats just my personal opinion.


cheers to the beers

all hail to the ale

and a fruit based cocktail for the ladies

(quote : Al Murray, the pub landlord, circa 2004 )


13 days to go , till the BigPhil Pub Roadshow arrives in SE15

I would say I only drink when I go to the Mag about 80% of my visits. I totally understand a preference for somewhere like the CPT but


a) to state it's really a restaurant now isn't factually accurate

b) the CPT is suffereing for a lack of customers


From a preference point of view you are right. But if the argument is (and it was) do pubs need to accomdate food to survive/thrive - I would say the answer is yes

  • 2 weeks later...
  Quote
BigPhil Wrote:


But the main thing that will get customers coming back is GOOD STAFF !



This is one of the reasons The Duke failed in it's previous incarnation imo. The surly kid with the tattoos put me off going there big time.


The Gowlett and The Nun's Head seem to hang on to friendly staff who look like they really enjoy working there. The less friendly ones don't last.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...