Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Did anyone watch the Channel 4 Program ...Worlds Most Expensive Food


The Program highlighted the life style of the Super Rich.. Billionaires


?325 for a cup of cat poo coffee and ?24,000 for a tin of caviar ?5,000 for a shot of rare cognac.


.. about providing food on Private Jets..


Cost to provide a Airline meal.. ?1.00 - ?2.00

First Class... ?4.00 - ?10.00


Private Jet just to provide ?200.00 +



Billionaires are paying ?60m for private jets and expect to be able to eat ANYTHING they ask for.


Was a real eye opener. 10 times + the cost of the Worlds top Michelin Star Restaurants


http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/worlds-most-expensive-food-325-5691814

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/58785-worlds-most-expensive-food/
Share on other sites

Fair point, but it's not exactly News is it? Been going on since the dawn of time when important family living in the penthouse cave got the best cut of raw mammoth.


During the war the rich managed to live it out in Park Lane hotels eating three course meals every night whilst the rest of the population had to make to with tinned snoek.

Lowlander Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fair point, but it's not exactly News is it? Been

> going on since the dawn of time when important

> family living in the penthouse cave got the best

> cut of raw mammoth.

>

> During the war the rich managed to live it out in

> Park Lane hotels eating three course meals every

> night whilst the rest of the population had to

> make to with tinned snoek.


I wasn't suggesting it was news.. It was just an interesting program.

Probably why it was given the Prime TV slot of 09.00 - 10.00 pm


Jeese .. some folk will want to make a argument about just about anything.


Sorry I brought it your attention.


It crossed my mind when people are discussing East Dulwich prices and not wanting to hi-jack another thread

thought I would start a new one.


DulwichFox

I thought it was really pathetic...lots of people eating things that are expensive rather than because it was nice. The Chinese guy clearly didn't like caviar but felt the need to eat it because of the price, and the "ladies" at the caviar tasting clearly knew sweet FA about it but still trying to out do each other.

DirtyBox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Chinese guy clearly didn't like caviar but felt the need to eat it

> because of the price


I think that's very much a Chinese thing... abalone tastes of nothing and has the texture of tyre rubber, but people pay loads of money to eat it. Shark fin soup is served at meals as a sign of affluence/generosity, even though the fin has no flavour at all. Wine has to be from the most renowned chateaus, even though most people don't know the difference between a good and bad wine.

There is no doubt that the pleasure one derives from eating goes way beyond simple taste, nutritional content or other substantive qualities of the food itself. Eating is also a ritualistic act, with all kinds of emotional, social and psychological associations.

Jeremy Wrote:


> Wine has to be from the most

> renowned chateaus, even though most people don't

> know the difference between a good and bad wine.



I was in Singapore a few years ago at a party and the host served some French wine that was so corked I nearly puked...he had been happily drinking it and talking bollocks about fruity notes all evening

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lowlander Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Fair point, but it's not exactly News is it?

> Been

> > going on since the dawn of time when important

> > family living in the penthouse cave got the

> best

> > cut of raw mammoth.

> >

> > During the war the rich managed to live it out

> in

> > Park Lane hotels eating three course meals

> every

> > night whilst the rest of the population had to

> > make to with tinned snoek.

>

> I wasn't suggesting it was news.. It was just an

> interesting program.

> Probably why it was given the Prime TV slot of

> 09.00 - 10.00 pm

>

> Jeese .. some folk will want to make a argument

> about just about anything.

>

> Sorry I brought it your attention.

>

> It crossed my mind when people are discussing East

> Dulwich prices and not wanting to hi-jack another

> thread

> thought I would start a new one.

>

> DulwichFox



OK I get your point mine was that it wasn't news. Sorry.


Anyway also look at the "reassuringly expensive" Stella and branding; people get a sense of satisfaction from buying premium or recognised brands. Which when it gets to ?325 for a cup of coffee becomes absurd...


But what is that scale in East Dulwich? The new Italian place and GBK (pay extra for ketchup!) perhaps?

DirtyBox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was in Singapore a few years ago at a party and

> the host served some French wine that was so

> corked I nearly puked...he had been happily

> drinking it and talking bollocks about fruity

> notes all evening


Doesn't surprise me at all. I think people are slowly wising up (the days of drinking it with 7up are probably gone) but the pursuit of prestige - even amongst people with modest means - is always something of a culture shock.

Using a spoon made of bone, spoon the caviar onto the back of the hand, then eat it directly off the back of your hand because using a silver or a gold spoon may impair the flavour through oxidisation...


What a load of old tripe! How pretentious do these billionaires wanna be?


Personally I eat it direct from the spoon made of bone with minimal airtime and a whisky chaser.

Don't really have a problem with the rich spending hundreds on a coffee or thousands on a steak because it was reared on Beethoven and vintage Sake and slaughtered by being talked to death by a coterie of Oxbridge dons - the percentages probably work out vis an average ED resident, their income and a ?3 latte or Kobe burger.


But this guff about eating or drinking gold leaf. Is it just so their shit sparkles?

General Sir Lord Fox of Dulwich,


I would like to propose that you start your own Dulwich Fox Price Index (DFPI). Unlike the established RPI which measures the changing costs of retail products and services, the DFPI would:


- Have it's underpinning basis in late 1970's goods pricing

- Take into account a "blow in " adjustment i.e the effect of gentrification on commercial lease prices

- Assess with like for like comparables elsewhere in the neighbourhood

- Negate the differences between economy and premium products

- Exclude any measures of pizza pricing (pizza is not a worthy food).

- Measure curry house pricing increases since the mid 1980's taking into account their "economic" operating models


What say you sir?

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> General Sir Lord Fox of Dulwich,

>

> I would like to propose that you start your own

> Dulwich Fox Price Index (DFPI). Unlike the

> established RPI which measures the changing costs

> of retail products and services, the DFPI would:

>

> - Have it's underpinning basis in late 1970's

> goods pricing

> - Take into account a "blow in " adjustment i.e

> the effect of gentrification on commercial lease

> prices

> - Assess with like for like comparables elsewhere

> in the neighbourhood

> - Negate the differences between economy and

> premium products

> - Exclude any measures of pizza pricing (pizza is

> not a worthy food).

> - Measure curry house pricing increases since the

> mid 1980's taking into account their "economic"

> operating models

>

> What say you sir?


Are you on Medication ?


DulwichFox

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Doesn’t seem that simple   according to fullfact that’s a net figure   ” The £21.9 billion was a net figure. Gross additional pressures totalling £35.3 billion were identified by the Treasury, and approximately £13.4 billion of these pressures were then offset by a combination of reserve funds and other allowances. The additional pressures identified were as follows: 2024-25 public sector pay awards (£9.4bn) ”   I don’t think Labour have set expectation that changing government cures all the ills. In fact some people on here criticise them for saying exactly opposite “vote for us we’re not them but nothing will change because global issues”   I think they are too cautious across many areas. They could have been more explicit before election but such is the countries media and electorate that if they were we would now be stuck with sunak/badenoch/someone else with the 14 years of baggage of their government and infighting  the broad strokes of this government are essentially along right lines  also loving ckarkson today “ Clarkson: Your claim that I bought a farm to avoid taxes is false and irresponsible.  BBC: It’s your own claim.  Clarkson: What’s that got to do with anything?” and by loving I mean “loathing as much as I ever have”    
    • BBC and the IFS https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2e12j4gz0o From BBC Verify:   Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank said Reeves "may be overegging the £22bn black hole". What about the rest of the £22bn? The government published a breakdown, external of how it had got from the Treasury's £9.5bn shortfall in February to the £22bn "black hole". It said that there was another £7bn between February and the actual Budget in March, as departments found out about new spending pressures and the government spent more on the NHS and the Household Support Fund There was a final £5.6bn between then and late July, which includes almost a month when Labour was in power. That was largely caused by increases in public sector pay. It was the Labour government that accepted the recommendations of the Pay Review Bodies (PRBs), but they said that the previous government should have budgeted for more than a 2% increase in public sector pay. Prof Stephen Millard from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research think tank told BBC Verify: "The 'political' question is whether you would count this as part of the fiscal black hole or not. If you do, then you get to the £22bn figure; if not, then you’re left with around £12.5bn to £13.5bn." It isn't this at all. When you run on an agenda of change and cleaning up politics and you put all of the eggs of despair in a basket at the door of the previous government you better hope you have a long honeymoon period to give you time to deliver the change you have promised. Look at the NHS, before the election it was all...it's broken because of 14 years of Tory incompetence and the implication was that Labour could fix is quickly. Then Wes Streeting (who is one of the smarter political cabinet members and is clearly able to play the long game) started talking about the need to change the NHS before the election - he talked about privatising parts of it (much to the annoyance of the left). He was being pragmatic because the only magic wand that is going to fix the NHS is massive reform - it's broken and has been for decades and throwing money at it has just papered over the cracks. Now Labour talk about the NHS needing 10 years of healing for there to be real difference and people are saying....what..... Words in opposition are easy; actions in government are a lot harder and I fear that given the structural issues caused by Covid, the energy crisis, the war in Ukraine (and now maybe a massive US/China trade war if Trump isn't bluffing) that we are heading to constant one-term governments. I don't think there was a government (and correct me if I am wrong) that survived Covid and in a lot of countries since Covid they have had regular government change (I think what is playing out in the US with them voting Trump in is reflective of the challenges all countries face). Labour massively over-egged the 14 years of hurt (who could blame them) but it is going to make things a lot tougher for them as they have set the expectation that changing government cures all the ills and as we have seen in the first 90 days of their tenure that is very much not the case. Completely agree but the big risk if Farage. If Labour don't deliver what they promised or hit "working people" then the populists win - it's happening everywhere. Dangerous, dangerous times ahead and Labour have to get it right - for all our sakes - no matter what party we support. P.S. Lammy is also one of the better Labour front-bench folks - he just is suffering from Labour's inability to think far enough ahead to realise that some posts might come back to haunt you...but in his defence did anyone really think Americans would be daft enough to vote him in again....;-)
    • My cat has been missing since Sunday evening 17th November he is British short hair male cat colour black with grey stripes. medium to large in size. He is easily identified by a large tooth missing on the top left of his mouth.  He lives in Upland Road just near the roundabout at Underhill Road. His name is Jack but he  only answers to Puss Puss please call me on 0208 299 2275 if you see him.   thank you Linda  
    • I think this could go on endlessly, so I suggest we finish it here!  But why don't you  track down the makers of the sign? Which hopefully has amused a lot of people, as well as brightening my bus journey. Tell  them that their directions to Dulwich are not only wrong, but they do not seem to know where the "real" Dulwich is 🤣 I'm sure they will be delighted 🤣  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...