Jump to content

Recommended Posts

GBK's been around longer than beardy hipsters, though, hasn't it? I must say (though I haven't been in a while) that I've never felt it's a smug, sneering place, just somewhere to get a filling, tasty burger and chips. I'm not averse to MacDonald's but they are just so unfilling, 10 minutes after you've finished you're hungry again, which I find a whole lot more annoying than some free nuts.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah but GBK is about as trendy as Garfunkels... I

> think peachycheeks is talking about places like

> meatliquor, honest burgers, etc.


Neither Meatliquor nor Honest Burger give free nuts. Has the thread moved on from nuts?

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Neither Meatliquor nor Honest Burger give free

> nuts. Has the thread moved on from nuts?


Kinda. KeekySnorky sort of broadened the discussion to the wider hipster "dirty" burger thing. Then someone said that GBK predates that. I was pointing out that...


oh who cares...

600 million indians have no regular access to bogs, 75% of them poo randomly in the open outside the cities- this is the point i was making regaridng eating wiv yer hands. I havent eaten meat since University, so its a sorta non issue for me, just the rest of the bearded yo ho ho matey mugs who pay ?25 a go to hanker down in SE15 arches yurts to eat raw liver burgers delivered on a sheet of flaky asbestos tiling and drink tepid thames water out of a chipped robinsons jam jar with the golliwog label still attached

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I like burgers. Whether it's from McDs, Shake

> Shack, or Hawksmoor... I like them all.


It seems a bit sacrilegious to go to Hawksmoor and not get a steak but I would like to try one of their burgers.

KB - Well luckily we DO have access to toilets and washing facilities, so eating with your hands is perfectly safe. I'm sure they could rustle up some kind of bland veggie alternative for you.


phobic - as much as I love a good steak, they do a very good burger for ?15 (or a French dip sandwich for around a tenner I think). I can't always drop ?60+ a head on dinner...

its all toss


a cafe selling only cereal, hand food only, a gaff specialising in crisp sandwiches- these people seem to rejoice in removing the past several hundred years of social and economic development and reducing everything they do to the level of a emotially repressed child - primary colour fixies with no brakes or gears , not wearing socks with shoes, eating with yer hands, shops specialising only cup cakes, rod jane and freddie coloured dungarees, pink timmy mallet bloody glasses...what the fuck are these poltroons trying to say


what next - sunshine orange & rusk cafes, fixies with stabilisers, giant tommee tippe cups instead of pint glasses, adult nappie cafes, ruberised pelican bibs in the lastest pop up raw meat emporium ?


anti intellectual luddite reactionary cultural rapist twats

oimissus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> GBK's been around longer than beardy hipsters,

> though, hasn't it? I must say (though I haven't

> been in a while) that I've never felt it's a smug,

> sneering place, just somewhere to get a filling,

> tasty burger and chips. I'm not averse to

> MacDonald's but they are just so unfilling, 10

> minutes after you've finished you're hungry again,

> which I find a whole lot more annoying than some

> free nuts.


Full agreement with everything except 'tasty'. What should be the core of GBK is instead... abomination. I do so miss Meatwagon...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good advice Kipper!  The 1.0 early Ecoboost and 1.2 Puretech engines have wet cam belts that fail and failure with a cam belt invariably result in catastrophic  damage to valves and pistons. Later ones were changed to chains. Avoid at all costs!
    • Sorry. Link wasn't working on my phone, but it is now, and I couldn't delete the post.
    • Sent you a pm
    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...