Jump to content

Recommended Posts

These tabletops are deliberately designed to b ambiguous IMO. The logic is that that ambiguity causes everybody to slow down. I do think they work pretty well for cars & other vehicles - but they can be dangerous in the situations like the op outlines above.

I've had a similar thing (at different junctions) happen a couple of times - one ended up with me on the floor

I find there are a number of points when cycling around town that confusion of this sort occurs. These weird tabletops, as Dadof4 says, cycling lanes that cross busy pedestrian paths with only markings on the ground (e.g. crossing Lancaster Place from Wellington street), ditto cycling contraflows etc. In a way, it doesn't really matter who technically had right of way, and who knows the correct Highway code, the real issue is poor design. You shouldn't have to know the code inside out to navigate the streets safely, it should be obvious and intuitive. Or maybe it's more that you just can't *expect* that people will know all the rules and regs, and be constantly alert all the time, so should design it so it doesn't matter.


It's definitely always annoying when a pedestrian steps out though, is in the wrong, and then get shirty. But I think it partly happens because people get defensive when feeling unsafe or under threat and especially if they might be in the wrong. It seems to be human nature! I know I'm not immune to this.


Not sure that helps with finding a solution though! Apart from maybe working with people like the London Cycling Campaign to ask councils and TFL for better design in this area maybe?

I'm sure I've said before


Pedestrians in the road ALWAYS have right of way - even if they shouldn't be there.

(which is kind of common sense)


That doesn't mean pedestrians can just step into the road - just that if they do they then take priority.

in that photo - it's so much easier for the pedestrian to use common sense (I would)

It can be annoying when people just step into the road to cross there- although on the other hand its fair to assume it DOES happen, and its nothing personal.

I find it odd that a mother with family felt compelled to say actually something to you - I only would if someone was going too fast or got a bit close - given you clearly got miffed by them ambling in front of you whos to say she didnt find any manoeuvre you took a to be bit threatening/aggressive ( if you are honest with yourself could it have been interpreted that way?)


I do sympathise with you but agree with previous posters on 2 points - 1) think of it more as priority than right of way (or common sense!) and 2) try not to let it anger you despite the fact it can be annoying when people do this at that junction


Im a cyclist (sometimes get impatient/ annoyed at crossings) and a pedestrian ( sometimes get annoyed/impatient at busy crossings!!!)

If a pedestrian sees a car/cycle coming and there is no zebra crossing then the cycle/car has the right of way. It's ridiculous for anyone to say that a car/cycle should always give way to a pedestrian already crossing. The reason we have zebra crossings and traffic lights is to give pedestrians the right of way. As far as I am concerned the family saw you, had no right to just cross in the absence of a zebra crossing and should have waited for you. I find however that pedestrians in ED seem to think they can walk across any road whenever they fancy and traffic should just give way.

bermygirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The red raised bricks are also not pedestrian

> crossings! I don't know what twit thought that.

> They are to warn blind people that they have

> arrived at a crossing. Good grief.



What? Where did you get that from?!? They do not warn blind people about crossings by raising the crossing!! They are informal crossings which are there to alert drivers to frequent crossings of pedestrians.

I would always err on the side of pedestrians having the right of way after I came across an incident in the City where a complete drunken suit was staggering around in the road and was hit by a very slowly moving car....it looked as if the suit had staggered into the car....the car driver got the blame!

bermygirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The red raised bricks are also not pedestrian

> crossings! I don't know what twit thought that.

> They are to warn blind people that they have

> arrived at a crossing. Good grief.


You're thinking of the pavement slabs with raised dots on the edges of junctions. Different beastie.

I suspect that jollyrogers on the previous page has it. It wouldn't actually occur to me to look for a cyclist coming down that street towards Lordship Lane as I know it to be one way, and did not realise cyclists could use it as a two way street. I would be concentrating on any traffic potentially turning in from LL.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...