Jump to content

Recommended Posts

i just wanted to say that I got an earful from my ex-housemate last Earth hour because I kept my light on, even though he left an average of four lights in our house (toilet, bathroom, kitchen & living room) on *all night, every night* for 6 months. He once told me a story abt a ghost who used to turn lights off in his old house, I just said "No it wasnt a ghost, it was ur mum"

Oh & i promise i'll use blackle from 8:30 onwards...

I'm going to flip the switch on the consumer unit, I am shutting down My Sony Vaio living room PC and getting ready to turn all electrical items off before hand be sure to power of everything if you flip you switch on the consumer unit otherwise you could blow a fuse when you turn it back on. Ive got 3 x laptops all batteries are charged and ready to go.

Forget giving up the cars. Looks like we'll have to go vegetarian:


While the Irish Republic and Denmark forge ahead with plans to introduce a "flatulence tax" on cattle ? much to the disgust of farmers in both countries ? UK farmers are bracing themselves for a similar move.

According to the United Nation's Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO), livestock is responsible for 18 per cent of the greenhouse gas emissions that are thought to contribute to climate change.


A cow emits as much as four tons of methane each year through burps and farts compared to 2.7 tons of carbon dioxide emitted by the average car.


The mooted tax of ?75 per cow would decimate the UK beef and dairy industry, which is already under strain from cheap milk and meat imports.


Farmers, however, are being encouraged to experiment with alternative diets to improve the digestive systems of their animals and stave off bovine flatulence ? and the accompanying tax.*


*The Telegraph

We did it too. Teenagers were grumbling but the younger ones found it very exciting with all the candles glowing. Made us think about how much electricity we normally use when we started turning everything back on again. Doubt the hour makes much difference but certainly raises awareness.

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Forget giving up the cars. Looks like we'll have

> to go vegetarian:


good point Peckhamrose... also, if not going vegetarian, try eating more chicken and less beef


to 'grow' one kilo of beef requires 11 kilos of food stuff

for pork it is 7 kilos to one kilo of edible meat

and for the dear old chicken...

two kilo of feed to result in one kilo of chicken


pretty obvious that being veggie (ie one kilo of veg = one kilo of veg!!) is the best option but hey, we're not all perfect

just do what you can


*adds [re]think to my list of reminders to self*


[re]claim, [re]create, [re]cycle, [re]duce, [re]make, [re]mind, [re]source and [re]use

spose its almost meaningless or deep as hell which way you want to look at it. Went to the british museum today, all the mummies and what not. As you go round you pick up on stuff like, incredible feats of mummification( how could they test that? with time?) and art and science and tools and thinking that has year tag further back in time from 'birth of christ' than we are ahead the other side of it yet. by at least a 1000 years. we are bitchin about earth hour. world resources, end of oil..

When you think about it global warming and the ensuing drop in population is just natural cycle of life.

A species is created, if it's successful enough it dominates its environment and expands its population, it requires more resources than that available to support its population and produces pollutants that restrict the ability of said environment to support it.


Population plummets until environment is capable of supporting species successfully again. Population increases to more sensible levels, but it will still overpopulate leading to a more moderate population crash, leading to a more sensible increase, etc, rinse and repeat until population finds equilibrium in about 8000 years time, assuming superior species hasn't wiped out planet with dangerous technology, or buggered off in pointy things with flames out the back.


Classic lifecycle; we are but bacteria in a petri dish, nothing to see here, move along (just glad I won't be around when the first and biggest crash begins).


Of course, all that said, we are blessed with intelligence and should be capable of breaking this, just all the evidence points at us being too selfish to do anything about it. The same reason why free markets won't solve anything, they positively rely on that selfishness!!

everyone is someone's kid charliecharlie.


But seriously, I don't think there's any room for complacency, I'm always banging the drum of the need for a seismic shift in the way we live our lives to prevent future catastrophe.


I'm merely pointing out that to a certain extent this is preordained on a macro level, it's simply the way life itself functions.


It's happened before to humanity, most populations in the world suffered catastrophic decline around the 15th century BC, probably down to climate changes, that's not to say that this one isn't man-made, it is, and not to say we can't do anything about it, though nooone knows if we've passed tipping point or not, and by the time we do, it will be too late of course.

[quote name=

Mockney Piers

everyone is someone's kid charliecharlie.


But seriously' date=' I don't think there's any room for complacency, I'm always banging the drum of the need for a seismic shift in the way we live our lives to prevent future catastrophe.


I'm merely pointing out that to a certain extent this is preordained on a macro level, it's simply the way life itself functions.]


yes... and you defined your viewpoint articulately and clearing... made for interesting reading


I was kinda teasing... but at the same time, was not talking about 'us'... ie. this generation, but 'them'... the next generation, our future

Surley you mean evolves MP over a period of millions of years. if not who is it created by?

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When you think about it global warming and the

> ensuing drop in population is just natural cycle

> of life.

> A species is created, if it's successful enough it

> dominates its environment and expands its

> population, it requires more resources than that

> available to support its population and produces

> pollutants that restrict the ability of said

> environment to support it.

>

> Population plummets until environment is capable

> of supporting species successfully again.

> Population increases to more sensible levels, but

> it will still overpopulate leading to a more

> moderate population crash, leading to a more

> sensible increase, etc, rinse and repeat until

> population finds equilibrium in about 8000 years

> time, assuming superior species hasn't wiped out

> planet with dangerous technology, or buggered off

> in pointy things with flames out the back.

>

> Classic lifecycle; we are but bacteria in a petri

> dish, nothing to see here, move along (just glad I

> won't be around when the first and biggest crash

> begins).

>

> Of course, all that said, we are blessed with

> intelligence and should be capable of breaking

> this, just all the evidence points at us being too

> selfish to do anything about it. The same reason

> why free markets won't solve anything, they

> positively rely on that selfishness!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...