Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I quite regularly see a male cyclist going past Alleyn's school with a toddler seated on the back (in correct safety seat) but she has no helmet and the main concern is that Dad also has 2 dogs in tow who run along the road on their leads which Dad holds whilst attempting to steer. It looks like a disaster waiting to happen. Does anyone know them? One of the hounds is quite big and it surely wouldn't take much for it to either get spooked or see a cat/squirrel and pull the bike over. Thoughts?
To see them wobbling along Townley Road pretty regularly makes me feel uneasy. As a mother myself, I worry about what could happen in most eventualities where a child is concerned. Would it be rude to pull over and talk to the guy? I guess not. It is the most bizarre sight.
If its a usual time he passes with this selfish behaviour then get some police advice and see if they can do something. Quite often people, although parents can be quite nasty when told about something their doing wrong. Better to do something than nothing, else guilt is pretty awful to live with.

Well I recently saw some 'idiot' with a child at the rear of their bicycle

and a second seated on what appeared to be another seat on the cross-bar.


I simple could not believe it.


Bicycles are dangerous enough without endangering the lives of your kids.


DulwichFox

Pugwash Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The cross bar and rear seats are common sight in

> Holland where I lived for a few months, with

> adults carrying 2 children


Cycling in Holland is a lot safer with purpose built Cycle lanes and a history of using bicycles.


Cycling here in the UK is different with inexperienced riders buying bicycles with no road experience

perhaps not even having been a car driver with road awareness and knowledge of road signs.


DulwichFox


See also those bloody carriages people attach to the backs of their bikes and pull kids along in. Bloody dangerous!



Not at all a fan of those myself - Bakfiets cargo bikes are enormously better for all sorts of reasons - but if you think it's the bike that's dangerous, you *may* be looking in the wrong place. I'm not playing semantics - it's quite uncommon in my experience for inanimate tarmac to leap off the ground and smack you about the head.


Best contraption I've seen around here is a chap cycling up Camberwell Grove on a stretch tandem with THREE smallish children all in a long line pedaling away.


And biggest idiot? Another fellow cycling along the A202, no handed, juggling. At least the balls were glow-in-the-dark for visibility though :o)

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well I recently saw some 'idiot' with a child at

> the rear of their bicycle

> and a second seated on what appeared to be

> another seat on the cross-bar.

>

> I simple could not believe it.

>

> Bicycles are dangerous enough without endangering

> the lives of your kids.

>

> DulwichFox


1/10

Some friends of mine used to take their baby boy out in a carriage behind their tandem bike (I think they might still do it with their youngest). They're good people and of course I respect their right to do whatever they think best, but whenever I saw them on this contraption I was absolutely terrified.


It's all very well to say "the bikes aren't the problem, it's the cars/trucks/buses".. and you'd be right... but at the same time, when it comes to personal safety you just have to realise that the roads are FULL of bad, selfish, aggressive drivers.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rahrahrah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Children transported by bike shocker.

>

>

> No one is saying children shouldn't be transported

> by bike.


I think you'll find they are....

Bunch of busybodies!


Should you "have a word with him"? No. Mind your own bloody business. He's not breaking any laws. I see a guy going up and down Crystal Palace Rd on a bike with his young son (aged 5 or 6) on a small bike in front of him. I think how wonderful that he's teaching his son road skills and drive appropriately in the circumstances.


This is why the new 20mph limit is such a good idea. It will make the roads safer for cyclists and encourage more children onto the roads.


We have an obesity epidemic in thsi country - we should encourage children on bikes at all times.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bunch of busybodies!

>

> Should you "have a word with him"? No. Mind your

> own bloody business. He's not breaking any laws. I

> see a guy going up and down Crystal Palace Rd on a

> bike with his young son (aged 5 or 6) on a small

> bike in front of him. I think how wonderful that

> he's teaching his son road skills.


Totally agree.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well I recently saw some 'idiot' with a child at

> the rear of their bicycle

> and a second seated on what appeared to be

> another seat on the cross-bar.

>

> I simple could not believe it.

>

> Bicycles are dangerous enough without endangering

> the lives of your kids.

>

> DulwichFox




Hmm, interesting view.


I used to regularly take my two kids on the bike that way, which they loved. The seat on the cross bar was a 'Weeride' (very comfortable and protective for the child), which makes the bike very stable as it centres the child's weight with that of the rider, counterbalancing the weight of the child at the back. This included going up and down Dog Kennel Hill on the nursery run.


I do not consider myself an idiot, nor would I do anything to endanger my kids. Even my wife, despite being terrified of cycling in London herself, felt confident that I could keep them safe.


You seem to have a very strong opinion there. What's your experience of cycling , Foxy?

From the OP: "I quite regularly see a male cyclist going past Alleyn's school with a toddler seated on the back (in correct safety seat) but she has no helmet and the main concern is that Dad also has 2 dogs in tow who run along the road on their leads which Dad holds whilst attempting to steer. It looks like a disaster waiting to happen......To see them wobbling along Townley Road pretty regularly makes me feel uneasy. "



Short of any statistics to show that riding with dogs has actually increased the chance of falling over when compared to riding alone, any judgement over the inevitability of disaster, which is what the OP asserted, can at best be a very subjective guess. The intuitive assumption that the dogs will pullthe bike over must be analysed further. The likelihood of that is conditioned very much on the combined weight of the bike and the two people, and also on the degree of anticipation of the rider. Would the OP have overlooked these factors in her estimate that the Dad wobbled along Townley road ?


The degree of danger exposed to the rider must also be considered in relation to the route. Townley road is not a highway as Pugwash put it. There are traffic in the morning, but it is not heavy and the cars are slow. I have actually observed that on average about 3 to 4 cars pass in 1 minute at a speed of around 10 miles per hour. An average rider would have completed that stretch of road in around 1.5 minutes. His average danger would be proportional to that of 5 cars going pass. This does not sounds excessive. One could make a reasonable comment that 1 car is enough to cause accident. This is tautological. An accident is indeed the occurrence of an unlikely event. 1 car is also enough to knock down a bike rider which is not carrying a child and 2 dogs running next to it.


So - this is my analysis, and I reach the logical conclusion that it is best to leave the judgement of safety to the dad.

actuarygi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Townley road is not a highway as Pugwash put it.


Can you explain that statement. A highway in my dictionary is " a public road on which all have the right to go"


I thought I had the right to go down Townley road, at least last time I was there I did. Are you suggesting that Townley road is excempt from the highway code?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Doesn’t seem that simple   according to fullfact that’s a net figure   ” The £21.9 billion was a net figure. Gross additional pressures totalling £35.3 billion were identified by the Treasury, and approximately £13.4 billion of these pressures were then offset by a combination of reserve funds and other allowances. The additional pressures identified were as follows: 2024-25 public sector pay awards (£9.4bn) ”   I don’t think Labour have set expectation that changing government cures all the ills. In fact some people on here criticise them for saying exactly opposite “vote for us we’re not them but nothing will change because global issues”   I think they are too cautious across many areas. They could have been more explicit before election but such is the countries media and electorate that if they were we would now be stuck with sunak/badenoch/someone else with the 14 years of baggage of their government and infighting  the broad strokes of this government are essentially along right lines  also loving ckarkson today “ Clarkson: Your claim that I bought a farm to avoid taxes is false and irresponsible.  BBC: It’s your own claim.  Clarkson: What’s that got to do with anything?” and by loving I mean “loathing as much as I ever have”    
    • BBC and the IFS https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2e12j4gz0o From BBC Verify:   Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank said Reeves "may be overegging the £22bn black hole". What about the rest of the £22bn? The government published a breakdown, external of how it had got from the Treasury's £9.5bn shortfall in February to the £22bn "black hole". It said that there was another £7bn between February and the actual Budget in March, as departments found out about new spending pressures and the government spent more on the NHS and the Household Support Fund There was a final £5.6bn between then and late July, which includes almost a month when Labour was in power. That was largely caused by increases in public sector pay. It was the Labour government that accepted the recommendations of the Pay Review Bodies (PRBs), but they said that the previous government should have budgeted for more than a 2% increase in public sector pay. Prof Stephen Millard from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research think tank told BBC Verify: "The 'political' question is whether you would count this as part of the fiscal black hole or not. If you do, then you get to the £22bn figure; if not, then you’re left with around £12.5bn to £13.5bn." It isn't this at all. When you run on an agenda of change and cleaning up politics and you put all of the eggs of despair in a basket at the door of the previous government you better hope you have a long honeymoon period to give you time to deliver the change you have promised. Look at the NHS, before the election it was all...it's broken because of 14 years of Tory incompetence and the implication was that Labour could fix is quickly. Then Wes Streeting (who is one of the smarter political cabinet members and is clearly able to play the long game) started talking about the need to change the NHS before the election - he talked about privatising parts of it (much to the annoyance of the left). He was being pragmatic because the only magic wand that is going to fix the NHS is massive reform - it's broken and has been for decades and throwing money at it has just papered over the cracks. Now Labour talk about the NHS needing 10 years of healing for there to be real difference and people are saying....what..... Words in opposition are easy; actions in government are a lot harder and I fear that given the structural issues caused by Covid, the energy crisis, the war in Ukraine (and now maybe a massive US/China trade war if Trump isn't bluffing) that we are heading to constant one-term governments. I don't think there was a government (and correct me if I am wrong) that survived Covid and in a lot of countries since Covid they have had regular government change (I think what is playing out in the US with them voting Trump in is reflective of the challenges all countries face). Labour massively over-egged the 14 years of hurt (who could blame them) but it is going to make things a lot tougher for them as they have set the expectation that changing government cures all the ills and as we have seen in the first 90 days of their tenure that is very much not the case. Completely agree but the big risk if Farage. If Labour don't deliver what they promised or hit "working people" then the populists win - it's happening everywhere. Dangerous, dangerous times ahead and Labour have to get it right - for all our sakes - no matter what party we support. P.S. Lammy is also one of the better Labour front-bench folks - he just is suffering from Labour's inability to think far enough ahead to realise that some posts might come back to haunt you...but in his defence did anyone really think Americans would be daft enough to vote him in again....;-)
    • My cat has been missing since Sunday evening 17th November he is British short hair male cat colour black with grey stripes. medium to large in size. He is easily identified by a large tooth missing on the top left of his mouth.  He lives in Upland Road just near the roundabout at Underhill Road. His name is Jack but he  only answers to Puss Puss please call me on 0208 299 2275 if you see him.   thank you Linda  
    • I think this could go on endlessly, so I suggest we finish it here!  But why don't you  track down the makers of the sign? Which hopefully has amused a lot of people, as well as brightening my bus journey. Tell  them that their directions to Dulwich are not only wrong, but they do not seem to know where the "real" Dulwich is 🤣 I'm sure they will be delighted 🤣  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...