Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think the time has come for us to have a grown up adult discussion about the true meaning of this word. As I am banned from the general issues section and cannot respond publicly to some of the pretty nasty sneering aimed at me on a certain other thread, I would like to raise it here.


In defence of my PM to this 'robbin' person, I was trying to make the point that sneering DOES work both ways. You can't accuse me of being obnoxious on the one hand (based on previous posts) when the very comment I am refering to made by you is indeed obnoxious. Lots of pot kettle black stuff going on here today.


A lot of my humour is lost in translation, but the lack of humour in some posters whilst sneering is obvious for all to see most of the time (I do hope you are taking note admin). I'm sick to the back teeth of people misunderstanding me even after I've explained myself, then winding me up knowing full well I can't respond on the thread in question. It's sneaky underhand tactical stuff which exposes your apparent 'anti troll' rants for what they really are, TROLLING.


Louisa.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/57259-sneering/
Share on other sites

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > A lot of my humour is lost in translation, but

> the

> > lack of humour in some posters whilst sneering

> is

> > obvious for all to see

>

>

>

> I have to agree that there are some unbelievably

> humourless people on this forum.


Surely not Otta.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/57259-sneering/#findComment-841223
Share on other sites

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > A lot of my humour is lost in translation, but

> the

> > lack of humour in some posters whilst sneering

> is

> > obvious for all to see

>

>

>

> I have to agree that there are some unbelievably

> humourless people on this forum.


I think it is just that Louisa's humour and also my own humour does not come across in written form.

It is true what Louisa said 'A lot of her humour is lost in translation'

That would seem to apply to myself..


Face to face its is easier to get what people are getting at when you have eye contact.

The little glint in the eye, the wink, the nod.. :)


DulwichFox

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/57259-sneering/#findComment-841225
Share on other sites

More subtle sneering. Get off your high horse. If you didn't want to respond and genuinely believed in the 'anti-troll' references you so spouted on the other thread, surely you'd not respond at all? Instead we have the 'not me honest gov' approach, where you reply by saying you won't be replying. If that isn't trolling I don't know what is.


Louisa.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/57259-sneering/#findComment-841233
Share on other sites

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> More subtle sneering. Get off your high horse. If

> you didn't want to respond and genuinely believed

> in the 'anti-troll' references you so spouted on

> the other thread, surely you'd not respond at

> all? Instead we have the 'not me honest gov'

> approach, where you reply by saying you won't be

> replying. If that isn't trolling I don't know what

> is.

>

> Louisa.


I agree, why should Louisa have to put up with everyone's 'take' on her but she doesn't have a voice in that area. Wrong on every level...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/57259-sneering/#findComment-841241
Share on other sites

The old Louisa is dead, I've promised myself and a few others to not steer back into previous conversational favourites of mine, and as yet have not done so. Then someone tries to push my buttons to get me to talk about a topic I have tried to leave behind me. So rather than rise to that, I am back with a completely different take on local issues. I refuse to be drawn on Iceland, class or parents with a buggy. From now on, I want to be taken seriously, any drinks events on the horizon? I refuse to be trolled back into previous topics.


Louisa.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/57259-sneering/#findComment-841281
Share on other sites

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The old Louisa is dead, I've promised myself and a

> few others to not steer back into previous

> conversational favourites of mine, and as yet have

> not done so. Then someone tries to push my buttons

> to get me to talk about a topic I have tried to

> leave behind me. So rather than rise to that, I am

> back with a completely different take on local

> issues. I refuse to be drawn on Iceland, class or

> parents with a buggy. From now on, I want to be

> taken seriously, any drinks events on the horizon?

> I refuse to be trolled back into previous topics.

>

>

> Louisa.


You could come along to Curry Club .. We have drinks before -- during -- and after our meal..


Foxy

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/57259-sneering/#findComment-841298
Share on other sites

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I for one don't mind having you around Louisa -

> even if those old topics you refer to were getting

> done to death by you and boring many. But if

> you're going to flounce then for god's sake do it

> properly....

>

> Coming back after just 2 days doesn't really

> count!


MrBen as I explained to Jeremy, I really tried but couldn't do it. I tried to delete my profile and realised it wasn't possible, then I thought oh bugger it the forum is getting more and more dull as many faces disappear, may as well go down with the sinking ship.


Louisa.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/57259-sneering/#findComment-841306
Share on other sites

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I for one don't mind having you around Louisa -

> even if those old topics you refer to were getting

> done to death by you and boring many. But if

> you're going to flounce then for god's sake do it

> properly....

>

> Coming back after just 2 days doesn't really

> count!



So what would've been better? If she'd done a proper 'flounce' and not returned at all?

You say you don't mind having her around so why question a change of decision?


You should be celebrating instead. One less missing person.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/57259-sneering/#findComment-841313
Share on other sites

Lou - when you do a massive rotten fart, sometimes it takes a while for the aroma to dissipate.


Try to think in terms of you having done one long, continuous, stinking guff - continually - for several years. You can't wave your hand a bit and away it goes. Can't be done. Its going to take some window opening and duvet wafting; possibly even a scented candle.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/57259-sneering/#findComment-841319
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That % of “affected” doesn’t mean they are all in deep trouble.  It means this will touch on them in some small way mostly - apart from the biggest farms  it’s like high rate tax earners taking to the street when Osborne dragged child/benefit claimants into self assessment.  A mild pain  the more I read, the more obviously confected it is. Still - just as with farage and his banking “woes”, a social media campaign is no barrier to the gullible  what percentage of farms affected by Brexit and to what degree compared go IHT?  Or does that not matter? Thats different money is it? 
    • Farmers groups say 35% of farms will be affected while the Treasury reckons its 27% - neither figure is a tiny portion. The problem is farming is often asset rich but cash poor meaning that those who inherit farms and have to pay the tax will likely need to sell land to pay for it and could well further impact the cash poor nature and productivity of that farm. I would have thought those who align on the left would be welcoming farmers protesting on the streets against a government making their lives more difficult. Good on them. Makes a change from tube and rail strikes at least! I was shocked to read that the average weekly earnings for agricultural workers was significantly lower than the national average.  Clearly Labour doesn't consider these working people.
    • A tax change that affects a tiny portion of farmers livelihoods and income - mass protest and wild accusations on forums like this    Brexit which impacted farmers income and uk food security far far far more ? Crickets. Absolutely nothing. “Price worth paying mate “   Don’t  be fooled about what this is about - it’s isn’t IHT.  
    • In deed, doesn't matter if he is a talented presenter he is, in my view, an rrrrrrsss.  Interestingly Farage was pronounced with a hard g.  But he affected the continental soft g.  Similar to the UK and US pronunciations of garage.  I've worked with people who were at school with him
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...