Jump to content

Recommended Posts



Anyone? English is my first language so I'm struggling with this



If you have a problem with xbox generally, we could have that discussion on that thread. But you seem to have a bee in your bonnet - you bang on about a "kids toy" as if you are some paragon of mature values- I have seen sweet fuck all from you to suggest you have a mental aged above 14 so do me a favour


The Pablo Picasso reference is a (tired) reference to anyone who tries to break the rules before learning them first. IE - you. Not me. You purport to want to engage in adult conversation but are incapable. You bang on about me playing consoles when that makes up what - 1% of my discourse that you are aware of? What's the matter with you?




Anyone CAN write any crap - the question is "why would they"? Why not have something meaningful to say and say it? And then have some fun as well? But all you have done you squalid little fuck, is denigrate and piss on everyones bonfire.


Begone

oh but I forgot


who is this daizie mentalist? She makes WMTD look sane


"hahaha @ sean getting gobby, if any of you really like him, stop him showing himself up, please..."


When she (I'm guessing) started posting she seemed alright - then went weird very quickly


Maybe she will say why I'm showing myself up. But that would assume she is capable of cogent argument instead of just going "tee hee.. pffft... * points finger * ... ooh I've just wet myself"

No, not that I can quite keep up with all this but Sean has his Righteous Avenger cape on and is putting to the sword each and every irritating pipsqueak who cannot or will not engage. Fight for this hallowed turf.


Its like in the middle of the Wales Ireland game, some Jack Russels are let onto the pitch and left to run around snapping at the players ankles and nuts, occasionally pissing by the posts. Amusing, sure, but hey, some people are trying to concentrate on this thing with its own history, idiosyncaries, unwritten terms and mores.

Most pointless and inflammatory user on this thread?


In the blue corner, daizie. Agressively jabbing with her poorly masked agenda carried over from a previous username.

In the red corner, WMTD. Wearing down with his complete lack of substance but continued presence, like a fart in a sealed room.


Sean to referee. Seconds out...

Woof what you've got to realise is that Sean along with others on this forum do genuinely enjoy playing computor games and if you start rubbishing something somebody enjoys whether it be a 'kids toy' or not then you're envoking an out of character response. I personally don't have much time for consoles such as the X-box or playstation 2/3 but my younger brother does and when a new game comes out he will do his damnest to get hold of it. I'm a current affairs geek and if someone tries to interupt me whilst I'm reading the paper I will not be pleased.


Another aspect of your posts Woof is that most of the time they make very little sense and the layout puzzles everyone. I personally think and I'm sure alot of the others will agree that you're just trying to be comical and trying to be a laugh which there's nothing wrong with in itself but sometimes in order to be taken seriously you do have to engage in a serious manner as alot of us incliding myself find the forum a useful tool. If you continue to behave like this then eventually you're going to be ignored.


Sean, there are far more original and colourful expressions than 'Twonk'. In future please try harder.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I went to France recently and in the city I visited there were large billboards on the main streets urging people to stop their dogs from messing on the streets and in a little park a sign said something to the effect that this park was built for your enjoyment not as a dumping ground for dog mess. There were also big signs about not fly tipping. I wonder if councils are too worried about offending dog owners by making a fuss about this major problem. I was a dog owner for many years, got free bags from the council and there were even bins around then.
    • I was also woken by this. It happened in two bursts, which felt even more anti social.
    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...