Jump to content

Avoid (General Building Works) at all cost


minh

Recommended Posts

Hello All,


Please avoid this building compamy. We had bought a house back in Jan 14 and wanted to get the whole house refurbished with a kitchen extension.


We found this building company and have agreed the payment and the time frame of the work. So the work started around April.


Up until now the full work has not been completed he stopped sending in people for about 2 months which delayed the work and they wanted more money from us without justifying why the final payment more then what we actually calculated.


As we havent agreed to his final payment he has left and have not given us the certificates we need for the electrical, gas, or plumbing.


So please avoid


GENERAL BUILDING WORKS

251 STANFORD RD

LONDON

SW16 4QH

Depends on how you look at it. But i would not recommend them. We had stopped the payment due to the lack of progress they were making. Each week we would have paid them according to what work has been done. Everysaturday we would come in and discuss what the next work would been done for the next week. 2-3 weeks nothing was done and still expected money. Obviously seeing that there was no progression and only sending in 1 person and not sure what he was doing we stopped the payment. Initially stated that the job would have completed by august. As there was delayes we accounted 2 months extra so thinking the job would have completed by Oct which was not. Then promised the job will be completed by Nov did not happend. So basically he was leading us on thinking the job would be completed. we had notap installed for a few weeks in the kitchen , i had to install the taps myself.


Each time he sends only 1 or 2 people. To protect ourselves we had to stop payment as there was still quite alot of work to do and the payments we have made does not match up to what works has been done. If the work was completed as stated we would not have stopped the payment.


Nevermind we have got someone else to come in and finished the work now, but just wanted all to be aware.

Do you have the names of any of the guys? I had an absolute nightmare with some Eastern European builders recommended on here, alarmingly when I re-looked up the review it had disappeared. I contacted the guy (I'd copied & pasted it) who wrote the review and he told me he'd taken it off because the guy had since disappeared for a few weeks, he thought he'd be back at some point but didn't know when. That was just one if the many problems I experienced. I'd be interested to see if it was the same lot.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...