Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

SO no one can make comment about homosexuals now is that what your trying to say.

Well expanding the subject what are your views on gay men on the t.v blatantly groping womens breast.If a hetro man done this he would be arrested,

There are two on t.v who are consistent offenders, one a morning fashion advisor and the other an ex gym dancer.

This groping of women is sexual assault.

Dont tell me you are all excempt to rules of behaviour.

Come on ladies its not ok to be touched up by gay men.

What are your hetrophobes views on that.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Look at me, look at me!!!

>

>

>

> Pleeeeeease, LOOK AT MEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Isn't that the guitar break from Lynard Skynard's Freebird, Otta!!!!!


Can't believe this thread has been resurrected. Must get back to general election, far more engrossing.


Or Lynryd Skynryd even !!


Third time lucky: Lynyrd Skynyrd !!

It looks like Sonia in east enders is bisexual....how they know what their real proclivities are when they are always 3 sheets to the wind is beyond me....but at least they used a condom, the wrapper of which got stuck to the social worker's (complete with flowing scarf) bum...

"SO no one can make comment about homosexuals now is that what your trying to say."


Can you read english Tarot? It's not that you comment on homosexuality, it's that you come out with stupid nonsense like children being at risk if they see a gay character in a soap ffs. If you want to write backwards tripe like that in a public forum, then don't be suprised if people ask you to prove it. Instead you waste everyone's time by conveniently ignoring the stuff you write and playing the victim instead.

The OP's original question is fair enough, and is the subject of research by broadcasters. The BBC's research in 2012 found that:


- the vast majority of audiences are comfortable with the depiction of lesbian, gay and bisexual people on radio, TV and online.


- many lesbian, gay and bisexual people themselves feel they are still under-represented by all UK broadcasters.


"Experts urged for more mainstream inclusion in news and current affairs, and more creative and realistic depictions in factual and drama television."


?perhaps that's what the OP has experienced. If increased representation makes some people uncomfortable, that's ok - many people who feel that way will come around.


More details of the research on the BBC's website here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/latestnews/2012/lgb-portrayal

The problem with the tv depiction of gay people is that the programmes had some really very camp characters verging on the ridiculous for a long time...John Inman, Larry Grayson, Paul O'Grady, Danny la Rue and these people were associated with being gay. Julian Clary was the first 'camp' man to be seen to have an excellent wit and intellect but the damage had been done by the previously mentioned people.

A lot of those programmes / were at same time as It Ain't Half Hot Mum and Bless Thy Neighbour, Jim Davidson the comedian and other 'humorous' programmes. So race / creed was also fair game during that period and for years before.

It's in the past, things have moved on, I don't think such programmes would go down well at all nowadays, regardless of whether the programming regulators would allow it.

Therefore I don't agree previous TV depiction has any bearing on representation now. There's no dependency nor even any link.

I'm not sure what happened then has caused damage that exists now. Most of the people from that period who still carry that mentality will be dead soon anyway, carrying their prejudice with them and hopefully freeing the rest of society from any latent influence that may have persisted.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The problem with the tv depiction of gay people is

> that the programmes had some really very camp

> characters verging on the ridiculous for a long

> time...John Inman, Larry Grayson, Paul O'Grady,

> Danny la Rue and these people were associated with

> being gay. Julian Clary was the first 'camp' man

> to be seen to have an excellent wit and intellect

> but the damage had been done by the previously

> mentioned people.



I'm not into comedians. Don't find the majority even funny but if I had to pick one? Julian Clary. So clever because the humour comes naturally.

And Paul O'Grady? One of the kindest, sweetest guys on TV who always puts animals first. Lovely person.

I half listen to the archers, and whilst I am predominantly hetro (and a bloke) I find the gay character on that has a very sexy voice.


My guilty pleasure is of course the lesbian snog of Beth Jordache and Margaret from Brookie in around 96, which they deleted from the omnibus.

I was cyling with a gay lady friend a few months after and we both enjoyed that.


Fast forward twenty years and the world is a better place in many respects. But watching a coule of old editions of the New Statesman and Black Adder 2 and was surprised by some of the homophobic dialogue, and of course these were were right-on alternative comedians. Just a meida product of the age not really a slur against Rick and Rowan

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Doesn’t seem that simple   according to fullfact that’s a net figure   ” The £21.9 billion was a net figure. Gross additional pressures totalling £35.3 billion were identified by the Treasury, and approximately £13.4 billion of these pressures were then offset by a combination of reserve funds and other allowances. The additional pressures identified were as follows: 2024-25 public sector pay awards (£9.4bn) ”   I don’t think Labour have set expectation that changing government cures all the ills. In fact some people on here criticise them for saying exactly opposite “vote for us we’re not them but nothing will change because global issues”   I think they are too cautious across many areas. They could have been more explicit before election but such is the countries media and electorate that if they were we would now be stuck with sunak/badenoch/someone else with the 14 years of baggage of their government and infighting  the broad strokes of this government are essentially along right lines  also loving ckarkson today “ Clarkson: Your claim that I bought a farm to avoid taxes is false and irresponsible.  BBC: It’s your own claim.  Clarkson: What’s that got to do with anything?” and by loving I mean “loathing as much as I ever have”    
    • BBC and the IFS https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2e12j4gz0o From BBC Verify:   Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank said Reeves "may be overegging the £22bn black hole". What about the rest of the £22bn? The government published a breakdown, external of how it had got from the Treasury's £9.5bn shortfall in February to the £22bn "black hole". It said that there was another £7bn between February and the actual Budget in March, as departments found out about new spending pressures and the government spent more on the NHS and the Household Support Fund There was a final £5.6bn between then and late July, which includes almost a month when Labour was in power. That was largely caused by increases in public sector pay. It was the Labour government that accepted the recommendations of the Pay Review Bodies (PRBs), but they said that the previous government should have budgeted for more than a 2% increase in public sector pay. Prof Stephen Millard from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research think tank told BBC Verify: "The 'political' question is whether you would count this as part of the fiscal black hole or not. If you do, then you get to the £22bn figure; if not, then you’re left with around £12.5bn to £13.5bn." It isn't this at all. When you run on an agenda of change and cleaning up politics and you put all of the eggs of despair in a basket at the door of the previous government you better hope you have a long honeymoon period to give you time to deliver the change you have promised. Look at the NHS, before the election it was all...it's broken because of 14 years of Tory incompetence and the implication was that Labour could fix is quickly. Then Wes Streeting (who is one of the smarter political cabinet members and is clearly able to play the long game) started talking about the need to change the NHS before the election - he talked about privatising parts of it (much to the annoyance of the left). He was being pragmatic because the only magic wand that is going to fix the NHS is massive reform - it's broken and has been for decades and throwing money at it has just papered over the cracks. Now Labour talk about the NHS needing 10 years of healing for there to be real difference and people are saying....what..... Words in opposition are easy; actions in government are a lot harder and I fear that given the structural issues caused by Covid, the energy crisis, the war in Ukraine (and now maybe a massive US/China trade war if Trump isn't bluffing) that we are heading to constant one-term governments. I don't think there was a government (and correct me if I am wrong) that survived Covid and in a lot of countries since Covid they have had regular government change (I think what is playing out in the US with them voting Trump in is reflective of the challenges all countries face). Labour massively over-egged the 14 years of hurt (who could blame them) but it is going to make things a lot tougher for them as they have set the expectation that changing government cures all the ills and as we have seen in the first 90 days of their tenure that is very much not the case. Completely agree but the big risk if Farage. If Labour don't deliver what they promised or hit "working people" then the populists win - it's happening everywhere. Dangerous, dangerous times ahead and Labour have to get it right - for all our sakes - no matter what party we support. P.S. Lammy is also one of the better Labour front-bench folks - he just is suffering from Labour's inability to think far enough ahead to realise that some posts might come back to haunt you...but in his defence did anyone really think Americans would be daft enough to vote him in again....;-)
    • My cat has been missing since Sunday evening 17th November he is British short hair male cat colour black with grey stripes. medium to large in size. He is easily identified by a large tooth missing on the top left of his mouth.  He lives in Upland Road just near the roundabout at Underhill Road. His name is Jack but he  only answers to Puss Puss please call me on 0208 299 2275 if you see him.   thank you Linda  
    • I think this could go on endlessly, so I suggest we finish it here!  But why don't you  track down the makers of the sign? Which hopefully has amused a lot of people, as well as brightening my bus journey. Tell  them that their directions to Dulwich are not only wrong, but they do not seem to know where the "real" Dulwich is 🤣 I'm sure they will be delighted 🤣  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...