Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Every time I look at the lounge and see threads like this... rather than despair, I look at the numerous decent posters who have responded and take consolation from the fact that there is still more good than bad on here.


Poor show tarot and you are as much a construct as others that are more well-known (and liked).

Well it seems tarot took the lowest common denominator route with this thread. People who use racism, sexism, and homophobia to get a cheap rise out of a community forum really need to go back to troll school. The seasoned EDF crowd will see straight through that one.


Louisa.

oh tarot can you believe there are gay story lines in the homo erotic world of comics too? How will you cope, that indignation may drive you insane, tip (over missus) you over the edge.

What happens when you saturate something then turn it to ice? A sort of gay glacification?

http://www.theverge.com/2015/4/21/8462897/iceman-x-men-gay-bobby-drake-brian-michael-bendis

Like they did you Loisa,troll school how was it for you dear.The thread was to ask if every

one was fed up with the gay storyline taking over the soaps not an attack as you all put it on homosexuals.You all cant scream and create everytime someone mentions gays.

Its a good job hetrosexuals dont create when you insult them.

Ask a straight questions (excuse the pun) and all theres been is hysteria, insults, threats of being buried alive and run over. WHOSE THE TROLL apart from Louisa.

It is confusing children like it or not.

Oh for heavens sake Tarot, are you for real? You justified your question by talking about watersheds and the imapct on children. Many people far more intelligent than you have pointed out why you are displaying signs of homophobia but you are too stupid to even know what they are talking about it seems.


There's only one reason why anyone would mention children and watersheds. That reason is because you, in your total moronic ignorance think children can be turned gay if they see lots of gay characters.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is anyone else sick to death of all the

> heterosexual storylines on all the

> soaps,Emerdale,Eastenders,Coronation street.

>

> Do you have any idea how ridiculous your post is?


Haha! Brilliant response.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can't believe no one has noticed that Tarot uses

> very similar tone, language and poor spelling to

> the serial "why do I not have any friends" person

> who trashes the general issues page on a regular

> basis with moronic and repeatitive threads.

> Coincidence?

>

> Louisa.



Not a true 'Troll' as in that sense..

Tarot has been around since 14/07/2009


DulwichFox

Tarot..


Like I said you have been around for 6 years or so. 1813 or so posts.


Having had a very brief scan over those years it would seem that you have engaged in interactive

conversation with other users. Showed an interest in the drinks club and socializing ..


But you now seem to be engaging in a more aggressive tone. Insulting Louisa and women in general

with comments like 'go and do your nails or something'


I think you need to tone it down a bit.


DulwichFox

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm guessing you don't want to borrow my Queer as

> Folk boxset then?

>

> Louisa.


Ha ha! Why didn't I think of that?


The best that Tarot can do now is to defend him/herself by claiming persecution for being a heterosexual bigot!


Tarot, you started the conversation. You might want to conveniently bury your head in the sand and pretend otherwise, but I remind you just one more time that you said that gay storylines before the watershed would damage children. YOU said that. If you are going to write stupid ignorant rubbish like that, defend it. Don't start playing the victim when people challenge you on it. Take responsibility for the crap that you type.

I gather from your ignorant post that you dont have much contact with children so it really is just Bla blah

with you.

Dulwich fox get of your high horse mate.

When you all stop thinking below your belts people might listen to what you,ve got to say.

Maybe some of you have,nt got kids so cant really comment.

Louisa is a dear old lady really.

Or "flamer", you dont hear that word much, but often think it's more apt than troll.


Personally I'm loving your work Tarot. Why don't you start a thread about why you'll be voting UKIP, so we can have serious discussion over the issue? Promise not to just call you racist (because I actually agree with you that that is too simplistic and hinders proper discussion - Better to just highlight the many reasons that they're a joke).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Doesn’t seem that simple   according to fullfact that’s a net figure   ” The £21.9 billion was a net figure. Gross additional pressures totalling £35.3 billion were identified by the Treasury, and approximately £13.4 billion of these pressures were then offset by a combination of reserve funds and other allowances. The additional pressures identified were as follows: 2024-25 public sector pay awards (£9.4bn) ”   I don’t think Labour have set expectation that changing government cures all the ills. In fact some people on here criticise them for saying exactly opposite “vote for us we’re not them but nothing will change because global issues”   I think they are too cautious across many areas. They could have been more explicit before election but such is the countries media and electorate that if they were we would now be stuck with sunak/badenoch/someone else with the 14 years of baggage of their government and infighting  the broad strokes of this government are essentially along right lines  also loving ckarkson today “ Clarkson: Your claim that I bought a farm to avoid taxes is false and irresponsible.  BBC: It’s your own claim.  Clarkson: What’s that got to do with anything?” and by loving I mean “loathing as much as I ever have”    
    • BBC and the IFS https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2e12j4gz0o From BBC Verify:   Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank said Reeves "may be overegging the £22bn black hole". What about the rest of the £22bn? The government published a breakdown, external of how it had got from the Treasury's £9.5bn shortfall in February to the £22bn "black hole". It said that there was another £7bn between February and the actual Budget in March, as departments found out about new spending pressures and the government spent more on the NHS and the Household Support Fund There was a final £5.6bn between then and late July, which includes almost a month when Labour was in power. That was largely caused by increases in public sector pay. It was the Labour government that accepted the recommendations of the Pay Review Bodies (PRBs), but they said that the previous government should have budgeted for more than a 2% increase in public sector pay. Prof Stephen Millard from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research think tank told BBC Verify: "The 'political' question is whether you would count this as part of the fiscal black hole or not. If you do, then you get to the £22bn figure; if not, then you’re left with around £12.5bn to £13.5bn." It isn't this at all. When you run on an agenda of change and cleaning up politics and you put all of the eggs of despair in a basket at the door of the previous government you better hope you have a long honeymoon period to give you time to deliver the change you have promised. Look at the NHS, before the election it was all...it's broken because of 14 years of Tory incompetence and the implication was that Labour could fix is quickly. Then Wes Streeting (who is one of the smarter political cabinet members and is clearly able to play the long game) started talking about the need to change the NHS before the election - he talked about privatising parts of it (much to the annoyance of the left). He was being pragmatic because the only magic wand that is going to fix the NHS is massive reform - it's broken and has been for decades and throwing money at it has just papered over the cracks. Now Labour talk about the NHS needing 10 years of healing for there to be real difference and people are saying....what..... Words in opposition are easy; actions in government are a lot harder and I fear that given the structural issues caused by Covid, the energy crisis, the war in Ukraine (and now maybe a massive US/China trade war if Trump isn't bluffing) that we are heading to constant one-term governments. I don't think there was a government (and correct me if I am wrong) that survived Covid and in a lot of countries since Covid they have had regular government change (I think what is playing out in the US with them voting Trump in is reflective of the challenges all countries face). Labour massively over-egged the 14 years of hurt (who could blame them) but it is going to make things a lot tougher for them as they have set the expectation that changing government cures all the ills and as we have seen in the first 90 days of their tenure that is very much not the case. Completely agree but the big risk if Farage. If Labour don't deliver what they promised or hit "working people" then the populists win - it's happening everywhere. Dangerous, dangerous times ahead and Labour have to get it right - for all our sakes - no matter what party we support. P.S. Lammy is also one of the better Labour front-bench folks - he just is suffering from Labour's inability to think far enough ahead to realise that some posts might come back to haunt you...but in his defence did anyone really think Americans would be daft enough to vote him in again....;-)
    • My cat has been missing since Sunday evening 17th November he is British short hair male cat colour black with grey stripes. medium to large in size. He is easily identified by a large tooth missing on the top left of his mouth.  He lives in Upland Road just near the roundabout at Underhill Road. His name is Jack but he  only answers to Puss Puss please call me on 0208 299 2275 if you see him.   thank you Linda  
    • I think this could go on endlessly, so I suggest we finish it here!  But why don't you  track down the makers of the sign? Which hopefully has amused a lot of people, as well as brightening my bus journey. Tell  them that their directions to Dulwich are not only wrong, but they do not seem to know where the "real" Dulwich is 🤣 I'm sure they will be delighted 🤣  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...