Jump to content

Recommended Posts

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/thousands-set-to-attend-reclaim-brixton-rally-as-campaigners-protest-against-gentrification-10158208.html


Not totally sure how I feel about this.


On one hand the negative side of gentrification is obvious, people feeling disengaged/disenfranchised from the community, renters and businesses being priced out of the area, etc. I appreciate the history of the area... but on the other hand, places change, people move around. It happens.


From a more self-centred angle... the area has lost a lot of its edginess which made it a destination for me and my mates back in the late 90s/early 2000s, but I'm not 21 any more, and I personally quite like the way the area has developed.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/56470-reclaim-brixton/
Share on other sites

I was reading about this yesterday. I totally sympathise with those that feel they're being alienated from their home, and I definitely am against the development around the arches.


But there are plenty of comments from people (including young people) who say they grew up there and much prefer it now.


I think with gentrification there is always a line where it goes too far.


What I really don't like it gentrification on a large scale involving developers. That's when people start to feel like social cleansing is at play.


But stopping an area feeling dangerous after dark is never a bad thing.

The area feels a lot safer now, that's for sure. Being hassled for cash was part and parcel of a night out in Brixton in 98. And of course you could buy drugs quite openly.. which seemed great at the time, but probably not so desirable if you live round the corner.


I really like what's happened in the market - but I can understand locals feeling that it's not really catering to them (see Jay Rayner's scathing review of the hipster fried chicken place).


As for redeveloping the arches, it seems rather unnecessary, and opportunisitic money grabbing by Network Rail. (and looks like the same might be happening in Peckham). Nobody likes seeing local businesses being booted out.

My dad worked in the market for years, and whilst it was a bit grimey, it was great, so many cool little shops. I do think that's a loss. But hey, lots of other people would have thought it was a shit hole and will prefer their little bars and stuff.


At the end of the day whatever makes the most money will win out.

It is indeed a tricky one... when you have a city with lots of affluent young-ish people, but nevertheless the traditionally "nice" areas are out of reach for them... gentrification of working class neighbourhoods is inevitable. But at the same time, it isn't right that long term residents and shop keepers are booted out.
I think the gentrification argument has probably been had in all corners of London.. from Notting Hill to Islington to Hackney to Clapham. But I think to some extent Brixton is seen as a special case, in that it's sometimes regarded as the de-facto home of black London (even black Britain).
I smiled when I saw the 'Yuppies Out' graffiti a few months ago in Brixton. Just shows you the age and attitude of those objecting to gentrification, as no-one apart from an 80s post-punk class warrior would use such a phrase. And I wonder what the locals thought when the post-punk class warriors moved in in the first place...

Ethnic cleansing.


Look at the change in demographics. It's happened around here.


Elephant will be next.


It was quite exciting when I lived just up the road from Loughborough Junction (still a well dodgy area).


PS you can all clear off back to Clapham/Shoreditch. I'll let you judge whether I am saying this in jest (not sure myself).

brezzo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Squatters, anarchists, alternative life stylists

> are often the harbingers of gentrification, but

> they are usually loath to acknowledge it.



That's because they're ashamed that lots of really dull people have moved in trying to bask in their cool light.


ED had a different gentrification, it was never really cool.

Otta Wrote:

------------------------------------------------------

> That's because they're ashamed that lots of really

> dull people have moved in trying to bask in their cool light.


TBH most of the squatters and "anarchists" from the 80s/90s have probably become dull, boring conformists themselves.


But yeah a lot of the people who were into Brixton because of it's "edginess" have probably paved the way for its gentrification in some way.


> ED had a different gentrification, it was never really cool.


ED never had nightlife, it was never really a magnet for cool 20-somethings... it was just a reasonably pleasant, affordable neighbourhood in zone 2, and it sprang from there.

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I like the idea of a 50+ squatter spray painting

> 80s slogans on walls, but the scenario of that 50+

> person being a marketing executive enjoying a fine

> wine in a nicely renovated Victorian property

> seems more likely somehow.



:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That % of “affected” doesn’t mean they are all in deep trouble.  It means this will touch on them in some small way mostly - apart from the biggest farms  it’s like high rate tax earners taking to the street when Osborne dragged child/benefit claimants into self assessment.  A mild pain  the more I read, the more obviously confected it is. Still - just as with farage and his banking “woes”, a social media campaign is no barrier to the gullible  what percentage of farms affected by Brexit and to what degree compared go IHT?  Or does that not matter? Thats different money is it? 
    • Farmers groups say 35% of farms will be affected while the Treasury reckons its 27% - neither figure is a tiny portion. The problem is farming is often asset rich but cash poor meaning that those who inherit farms and have to pay the tax will likely need to sell land to pay for it and could well further impact the cash poor nature and productivity of that farm. I would have thought those who align on the left would be welcoming farmers protesting on the streets against a government making their lives more difficult. Good on them. Makes a change from tube and rail strikes at least! I was shocked to read that the average weekly earnings for agricultural workers was significantly lower than the national average.  Clearly Labour doesn't consider these working people.
    • A tax change that affects a tiny portion of farmers livelihoods and income - mass protest and wild accusations on forums like this    Brexit which impacted farmers income and uk food security far far far more ? Crickets. Absolutely nothing. “Price worth paying mate “   Don’t  be fooled about what this is about - it’s isn’t IHT.  
    • In deed, doesn't matter if he is a talented presenter he is, in my view, an rrrrrrsss.  Interestingly Farage was pronounced with a hard g.  But he affected the continental soft g.  Similar to the UK and US pronunciations of garage.  I've worked with people who were at school with him
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...