Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It's why he didn't want to go head to head with Miliband. One thing that struck me about the Paxman interview was the squirming body language when Paxman pushed him on food banks and anything else he found difficult.


I think here Cameron comes accross as a broken record, and lacks any charisma whatsoever (the only good news for him is that he's not the only one).

True - it is pretty much a blandathon.


Also wondering if this is the Loose Women studio (although the set-up and music is very much "Going For Gold") and they've left the audience protocols and cues in place which would explain the bursts of applause before and after breaks (which seem very weird in this context).


Or is it more Pavlovian? Do some people (the kind who would willingly be in a tv studio audience for... anything) on hearing the words "We'll be back after this break" applaud like demented sea lions without even being aware of it?

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm getting really irked on the housing debate. Not one of those politicians has as yet put home

> building as a priority over help to buy, rent to buy and all the other bonkers schemes they dream

> up to keep the market inflated.


Well, Farage did....

He (Farridge) always comes across well in shit like this because it's so shallow.


Milliband missed a trick by just trying to say the words Prime Minister a lot in the hope people would associate him with the post - I think he got that from an old Shredded Wheat campaign.


Green person was stupid, Scots extremist was bitter, Clegg was begging for "same again please", Cameron hid and yep - I'd still vote Plaid Cymru.

Sturgeon and Farage played the game the best. Farage especially knows how to make punchline points very quickly and that was really effective given the totally random format. Sturgeon was also quite concise and got good points over.


Clegg had a curious line to tread, having to back the government, yet separate himself from it. And didn't do too bad a job. But not too memorable, either.


Miliband really didn't do well with the format. Failed to really land any blows on Cameron - and got rather shown up by Sturgeon in particular. I think the same person who taught Gordon Brown to smile (shudder) taught Ed to look weirdly into the camera.


Cameron didn't have a great night, as expected, but landed a great punch on Miliband over zero-hours contracts. But generally seemed to be content with damage limitation.


Still thought Plaid Cymru lady looked asleep (and ladida needs his eyesight checked!). Made a few decent points, but sounded the least sure in what she was saying.


Green Natalie had a bit of a shocker. All over the shop. She is no Caroline Lucas (who would have been very good in this format).

I thought Farage made a lot of sense in the answers he gave and i for one was impressed.The scots rep kept guiet on the subject of student fees and free prescriptions, no wonder she could crow about her health care. As for Nick cleg, didnt mention how he vetoed cancer drugs for some patients.

David Cameron, looked non plussed when guestioned about immigration and europe. The green party woman was boring, the plaid cuymbri needed go faster batteries. Dave Milliband zoomed in on the camera just like gromet.it was not a good debate at all. Too in favour of the boring three,.I predict the people will realise any goverment voted in will only be a small muted branch of the mighty german gaelic dictatorship. I,mwith NIGEL FARAGE, all the way,

u.k.i.p is agenuine political party whose title means they want to leave the e.u.as a lot of people do.

to keep waving the old racist bigot card is ignorant, it wont stop people voting the days of politacal correctness are done .

The line must be drawn and common sense will prevail

Farage islikened to John the Baptist,the voice in the wilderness.

The e.u doesnt work who doth the bell toll for, the e.u.

Echo from my past posts, We are full up. Now true. OLD people turfed out of houses for larger familes Now true.bedroom tax to make people move by furitive blackmail.Now true. INFRASTRUCTURE COLLAPSING all over now true. Ghetto buildigs in Green east dulwich on every bit of space, Gardens for instance. Property value will plummet till someone stops thesoutwark planning department.

racism bigots so outmoded when overcrowding and self rule are the most important issues thing to fight for.

holloway Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I thought miliband sounded particularly nasal,

> even for him. he must sound like a trombone when

> he has a cold.



Hahahaha...he was, super nasal. That and the strange staring into camera was a bit odd. You knew that he had had Leadership training all week! His bits just made me laugh because he got it so horribly wrong. Cringey Mili! I have no clue about anything he said because I couldn't get past the weird behaviour.

> Not sure where that will lead - most likely to a rainbow coalition if Cameron fails to get

> a majority.


SNP will not go into formal coalition. They would support Labour when they feel like it, which would make Miliband's premiership almost impossible and we'll be back at the polls within a year.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The private sector is not going to build a significant amount of social housing. Everyone is very keen for *everyone else* to subsidise construction of social housing. I take it none of the objectors to this scheme was suggesting putting up council tax so Southwark could build more social housing...? Social housing isn't going to appear in serious numbers if the state doesn't borrow money and build it.
    • They must be really desperate to collab with Tesla. Honestly, it's not even the worst thing they've done. I've noticed these sex events happening in the last few months at a place that's supposed to be a restaurant and venue. I was planning my wedding there and was appalled by the setup for those events. When I discovered what was going on, I was disgusted by how they were using the same rooms as 'playrooms' where families are supposed to eat. The hygiene and safety concerns are just unacceptable. We really need to come together as a community to put a stop to this! They're destroying a sacred, Grade II listed building, and it's just not right. The owners need to be held accountable for their actions. It's time for us to stand up and protect our heritage and ensure that these spaces are used appropriately, especially when they should be serving families and the community.   sex events vid.mp4 sex events videe.mp4 Literally promoting it on their Instagram! Only just taken down after scrutiny.     
    • yes, which properly explains why they responded to me on this occassion, as i included the CQC in my response. I have spoken to the Health Ombudsman, and they feel the regulator is more suited to the issues I have raise for more than a year now. welcome aboard. its great to have you on the thread. so sorry you are also experiencing issues. has this been addressed as yet?
    • Tbh most Tesla owners are people who are concerned about the environment and have purchased accordingly- but mr nut job has soured their purchasing- so I actually sympathise with them being associated with such an awful man. But to actively promote the company given the knowledge we now know about him makes utterly unacceptable. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...