Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Many people have strong (and entirely justified) views on fox-hunting, foie gras and cruelty to dogs/cats.


There are around 36 million commercial egg laying hens were kept in the UK in 2013 http://www.rspca.org.uk/adviceandwelfare/farm/layinghens/farming


In the UK the proportion of eggs produced in the different systems in 2013 was:


?51 per cent* of eggs produced in battery cages


?3 per cent* in barn systems


?46 per cent* in free-range systems (of which 2 per cent were organic systems).


By contrast, 20,000 foxes are killed by fox-hunting, and whilst I haven't been able to find out how much foie gras is sold in the UK, I'd wager more chickens and hens lead an unhealthy life.


https://www.vegsoc.org/layinghens


Why does no-body seem to care about farm animal welfare? I meet so many vegetarians/animal lovers who continue to eat mayonnaise/non-free range eggs, or drink milk from intensively farmed cows.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/56151-chicken-cruelty/
Share on other sites

People DO care about farm animals..


Many people are simply unaware of everything that goes on..


Like Prawns Crabs ?? Seafood Farms


Well you may be shocked to find out (and I bet you did not know) Eyestalk Ablation.


Eyestalk ablation is the removal of one (unilateral) or both (bilateral) eyestalks from a crustacean.

It is routinely practiced on female shrimps (or prawns) in almost every marine shrimp maturation or reproduction facility in the world


DulwichFox

The reason I don't eat meat/seafood is because I DO care about animals.

I'm sure lots of vegetarians do feel the same as me even if they are not vegan.


I use dairy-free products personally but I don't live alone so unfortunately have to share the fridge with my daughter's milk etc. To each his own.


I trust the organic, free-range eggs I buy & would never buy any others.

Haresfield Farm, Wiltshire. They are available from a home delivery company that I use.

There's been a big push for more free range chickens/egg production over the past decade. I'm sure if you compared 46% free-range eggs to 10/15 years ago the difference would be huge.


Regarding chicken meat- free-range is hugely expensive compared to battery farmed and i expect this is what put's most people off.

I do care.


We keep our own hens - all rescued and ex battery


We only buy meat locally direct from the farms, none is intensively farmed.


Milk is also sourced locally, again from non intensive farmed dairy cows.


Cost compares to Tesco prices but we no longer live in London.

I care as well, though probably I could do more.


I eat very little meat, but I won't eat chicken unless I know it is free range, and I won't knowingly eat battery farmed eggs.


I didn't know about prawns, why do they do that Fox? Apart from anything else, prawns are quite small, it must take ages?

I saw a programme about this recently on TV .. Could not remember why so had to Google:-


Most captive conditions for shrimp cause inhibitions in females that prevent them from developing mature ovaries. Even in conditions where a given species will develop ovaries and spawn in captivity, use of eyestalk ablation increases total egg production and increases the percentage of females in a given population that will participate in reproduction. Once females have been subjected to eyestalk ablation, complete ovarian development often ensues within as little as 3 to 10 days.


The most commonly accepted theory of why eye ablation reduces this inhibition is that a gonad inhibitory hormone (GIH) is produced in the neurosecretory complexes in the eyestalk


The eye stalks are quite prominent so easy to remove :-


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/52/Woda-6_ubt.jpeg/250px-Woda-6_ubt.jpeg



Full article :- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyestalk_ablation


Foxy

Ditto what many have said above, that we do care.


But what can we do when regulations around food production/ slaughter are not enforced enough and suppliers like Happy Eggs, who are supposedly supplying free range eggs use farms where the hens are trained to not go outdoors before they reach hen laying age. The door is open but they stay inside. It's a loophole producers use to circumvent the true definition of free range.


Why does it take undercover activists to expose this stuff?


http://www.fwi.co.uk/livestock/rspca-hits-back-at-viva-happy-eggs-expos.htm


Why aren't the regulatory authorities already doing it on a regular basis?


If you want to do something about chicken welfare, a good place to start is by not buying from fast food chicken businesses. If you saw the conditions in which that chicken is reared, you'd certainly never eat it again.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Which is exactly why I avoid seeing those

> conditions.



And that's why the cruelty continues, because people don't want to know and so there is no financial or other incentive for the cruelty to stop.


One small indication of human nature, and the terrible (in many respects) world we have made for ourselves :(

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A farmer I know says free range is crazy as you

> can't possibly vouch for the quality of the

> chickens' meat or eggs if they're free to roam and

> forage for themselves.


I know a few farmers, nice as they are they're not that progressive


Check out Fosse Meadows. Nice chickens, reared well, great flavour

Battery hens often produce poorer quality eggs with thinner shells. So any idea that quality control can only be measured in battery egg production is nonsense. Free range hens do not forage. They are fed just the same as battery hens. The difference is though that they get to stretch their legs instead of being pinned in all day and forced to lay eggs.


The same is true for cows. Cows that roam free and eat grass a far healthier than cows that are corn fed and kept in factories for mass burger production.


Free range chickens also, are not living in their own excrement all day and night, in barns with no windows. And they have more of a chance of not dying before they can be turned into your fast food. One of the daily tasks of a factory chicken farmer is to remove the dead chickens. Free range chicken is far healthier.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The world would be a sad and empty place without

> fried chicken Sue.


But the chickens have the last laugh.


Because:-


Fried Chicken makes people Fat, Obese. Clogs up peoples arteries promotes heart failure and type-2 diabetes.


Enjoy while you are still able to get of your A**e and get down to the Chicken Shop.


Foxy :)

Our chickens have a run which is in excess of 100m2, they don't search for their food, we feed them.


Yes, they get to wander around, play in the sandpit, sunbathe, shelter, eat grass / worms etc .


The Egg yolks are very different from eggs purchased from the supermarket and taste lovely!


Rubbish that free range is inferior!


We don't allow us to be fully 'free range' due to the risk of predators.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The world would be a sad and empty place

> without

> > fried chicken Sue.

>

> But the chickens have the last laugh.

>

> Because:-

>

> Fried Chicken makes people Fat, Obese. Clogs up

> peoples arteries promotes heart failure and type-2

> diabetes.

>

> Enjoy while you are still able to get of your

> A**e and get down to the Chicken Shop.

>

> Foxy :)



If I lived on a diet of fried chicken that might bother me slightly.


But as I don't, it doesn't.

For Many years I regularly eat Fried Chicken Ribs and chip.. Apple Pie..

a well as my regular curries.


At work with 30 people in my office it was always some ones birthday so Cakes donuts..


I was about 8 1/2 stone but reached 10 1/2 stone. Now that does sound a lot but on my frame it was enough

to develop type 2 Diabetes. 2011


Its not the fat.. its the carbs..


After careful diet control I have reversed my diabetes. Diabetes UK now acknowledge this can be achieved.

Only 4 - 5 years ago they refused to admit that. Well they did not know.

I eat virtually everything now but still have to be careful. I could still re-develop type 2 again.

As could ANYBODY else. especially if you are over 40.


Still eat Fried chicken occasionally but not more than once / twice a week and most of it ends up

as a late night snack for the Foxes. They like chicken but not ribs


DulwichFox

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The same is true for cows. Cows that roam free and

> eat grass a far healthier than cows that are corn

> fed and kept in factories for mass burger

> production.


Mis-information above, I think. Grain is expensive. Mature cattle are grain-fed only immediately before slaughter, as I understand it, in order to force them to lay down new fat deposits, increasing the degree of marbling (fatty infiltration) of muscle tissue and increasing meat tenderness... self-basting, really. All beef thus is grass-fed, only some is feedlot-finished. Beef from older cattle, supposedly more flavourful (years and years of wear and tear, think how good some of us would taste after decades of hard living!), is enjoying a vogue at present. I wager that much of it, no matter how long it's dry-aged, is made edible only by fattening in the animals' last few weeks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Why on earth is there so much interest, and negativity, after a 100 days of a Labour government when we had 1000s of days of dreadful government before this with hardly a chat on this Website?  What is it that is suddenly so much greater interest? Here's part of a list of what they have done in a 100 days - it's from a Labour MP so obviously there is some bias, and mainly new Bills so yet to deliver/put into law.  This reminds me of the US election where the popular view was that Biden had achieved nothing, rather than leading the recovery after Covid, a fairer tax system, housing, supporting workers, dealing with community unrest following high profile racist incidents,  So if we think Starmer is ineffective and Labour incompetent then we are all going to believe it? I do feel sick after seeing Clarkson on Newsnight, playing to the gallery.  Surely Trump must have a high profile role for him on the environment and climate change  
    • Hi looking for a shed for my allotment. Can pick up
    • But do you not understand how tough farming is, especially post-Brexit when some of the subsidies were lost and costs have increased massively yet the prices farmers can charge has not? On the BBC News tonight they said pig farming costs had gone up 54% since 2019, cow farming costs up 44% and cereal costs up 43%. The NFU said that the margins are on average 0.5% return on capital. Land and buildings are assets that don't make money until you sell them...it's what you do with them that makes money and farms are struggling to make money and so many farms are generational family businesses so never realise the assets (one farmers on the news said his farm had been in the family since 1822) but will have to to pay tax for continuing the family business. On another news item tonight there was a short piece saying the government has said that 50,000 more pensioners will be forced into relative poverty (60% of the average income) due to the Winter Fuel Allowance removal which will rise to 100,000 more by 2027. James Murray from the Treasury was rolled out on Newsnight to try and defend that and couldn't. You can't give doctors 20%+ and push more pensioners into poverty as a result.  The problem for Labour is the court of public opinion will judge them and right now the jury is out after a series of own-goals, really poor communication and ill-thought-out idealogical policies. And don't ever annoy the farmers.....;-)  
    • That % of “affected” doesn’t mean they are all in deep trouble.  It means this will touch on them in some small way mostly - apart from the biggest farms  it’s like high rate tax earners taking to the street when Osborne dragged child/benefit claimants into self assessment.  A mild pain  the more I read, the more obviously confected it is. Still - just as with farage and his banking “woes”, a social media campaign is no barrier to the gullible  what percentage of farms affected by Brexit and to what degree compared go IHT?  Or does that not matter? Thats different money is it? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...