Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It's quite fashionable to have a go at DulwichFox isn't it? You think you'll become more popular on the forum by doing so? You are wrong.


Or maybe you think it worked before with Louisa, keep it up and he'll leave too. Also wrong.


Foxy has got more sense than to take any notice of all the crap posts. He'll carry on giving advice, carry on being negative (as well as being occasionally positive!), carry on adding some humour and most people will enjoy reading his posts.

Granted, the forum would be quite dull if people didn't disagree with each other.

But I don't really understand starting a thread with an implied, then later stated, point of view, finding out that virtually no-one agrees with you, and then moaning that the EDF isn't representative of broader views in the area.

Did I miss something?

Atticus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DF, you habitually go after people and habitually

> get disproved. I'm no saint on this forum but your

> raison d'?tre here appears to be one of

> outsmarting, one which perpetually fails.



At least he's consistent tho

I'd rather see the street lined with aesthetically pleasing German cars than this heap of bike shed junk - why can't they just put in the docking stations like with the Boris bikes. The proposed bike shed design really is an eyesore, okay maybe it looks good on an allotment garden but on the street please, do me a favour!
Some people are lighter sleepers than others Jeremy, so yes people faffing around with bike locks, closing bike hanger door late at night or early morning is not a win-win situation for all neighbours whose bedrooms overlook the contraption. Now it all depends on how considerate the users of the bike shed are but what if they're the same bunch who don't give a damn about pedestrians on London Bridge each morning, are they going to give a hoot?

cathy p j Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We also received a document from Southwark council

> on Saturday, saying that there is a proposal for a

> cycle hangar to be installed in our road in

> Nunhead, almost outside our house, with the

> consequent loss of a parking space. The document

> refers to the council website for more

> information, but I can't find any further

> information about it there. If anyone can let me

> have more details, I would be very grateful.

>

> Thanks,

>

> Cathy


I think they take up half a (car) parking space and provide an additional 6 bike parking spaces.

And what if some one comes along with a pair of Bulk Croppers..


They will be off with 6 bikes in 5 mins.


Just attracts thieves..


Keep them safe in your house where they can be added to your home insurance for less than the hire charge.


It may me a little inconvenient but in the long run I think it's worth it.


DulwichFox

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And what if some one comes along with a pair of

> Bulk Croppers..

>

> They will be off with 6 bikes in 5 mins.

>

> Just attracts thieves..

>

> Keep them safe in your house where they can be

> added to your home insurance for less than the

> hire charge.

>

> It may me a little inconvenient but in the long

> run I think it's worth it.

>

> DulwichFox


you still lock your bike, even when it's parked inside the hanger.

Certainly, the aesthetics of the design could be improved, and probably will if the scheme is successful, but the idea remains sound. Is the opposition to the hangers based solely on aesthetic grounds? As previously stated it's unlikely that the designers would have overlooked a dampening mechanism on the gate, so noise is unlikely to be an issue.


It also seems to me irrelevant if the cycle hangers take up a parking space, or if that space is regained due to resulting increased bike/reduced car use. If a motorist owns two or more vehicles they can (and will) park them on the street. If a cyclist owns two or more bikes and wishes to keep one secured in a hanger, they can.



BTW, a quick glance anywhere around ED will prove that the streets are hardly lined exclusively with beautifully designed German cars!

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This should fit in on Goose Green..

> Would solve all East Dulwich Parking Probs..

> Create revenue and plenty of space for cycles

> too.

>

> .. And near the station. and all the shops and

> restaurants..

>

> http://www.graysshoppingcentre.co.uk/wp-content/up

> loads/2011/07/car-park.jpg

>

> Foxy Solving problems..


A slightly better alternative for Goose Green

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-24960489

Muley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> matthew123 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> ----

> "but it is somehow assumed

> that the rest of us are doing cartwheels over the

> idea of these pieces of metal junk lining our

> streets"

>

>

> Such as cars, for example?



:)) :)) :))

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Keep them safe in your house where they can be

> added to your home insurance for less than the

> hire charge.

>

> It may me a little inconvenient but in the long

> run I think it's worth it.

>



They can be added to your home insurance whether or not you keep them in the house.


And it's not "a little inconvenient" to keep them in the house, it's bloody inconvenient, unless you have a large hall and/or a way to your garden (assuming you have a garden) which doesn't involve lugging the bike, possibly wet and muddy, all through your house to get there.

I like the idea but this design, as well as looking like shit, gives the impression that a couple of enterprising chaps with a small kangol (or angle grinder) and a truck could half-inch a fully laden one in a few minutes.


They wouldn't even need the aid of a work-experience kid underneath to lift the wheels of the chained bikes, just secure the lid, flip upside down and *Bob*s your uncle; bikes in a basket.


To go.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello! I would be keen to hear from parents of secondary-school age in state schools of the cost of school trips overseas. Particularly interested in Kingsdale and Charter but all examples welcome. many thanks!
    • Or the government have it wrong. Certainly picking a fight with farmers, the very definition of working people, is probably not going to end well. The problem here is that Labour hung their hat on not taxing "working people" which was clearly the output of some awful focus group and clearly not the term they wanted to use. They failed to properly qualify what a working person is and it is now coming back to haunt them because the very definition of a working person is anyone who is, well, working and that covers a whole gamut of people and salaries. Don't pick a fight with farmers if you have stated you aren't going after working people because public opinion will be against you. Farmers are the backbone of any country and work so hard and yes, there are some that are incredibly well off but the majority are not and farming is a trade that gets handed down through the generations. And farmers will make their case very public in ways other groups won't.   Labour's communication has been awful but they got a free pass before the election because everyone was so focused on how awful the Tories were. But now they are in power and they are tripping themselves up because in leadership you need more than soundbites.   The "Son of a Toolmaker" is the type of thing that haunts politicians until the end of their career. Clearly someone decided to detach Keir from his grammar school, university (including Oxford), legal career, knight of the realm background. His face when everyone laughed when he mentioned it during one of the pre-election debates was a picture. He is the son of a toolmaker but you look a bit silly when people then say yes but your dad ran a tool-making company...   Coming into power on a ticket of "look how they have been behaving" and then behaving in many ways the Tories were has been a disaster for politicians of all parties. The clothing funding and access to no.10 was just a nightmare for them and in these days where today's newspaper is no longer tomorrow's chip paper the comments made about Trump (which I am sure most people can agree with) are just embarrassing.   Winter Fuel Tax has been a disaster. Yes, there are many pensioners who don't need it but those aren't going to be the ones talking to the media about how awful the winter is going to be and people only remember those shouting the loudest.   The budget was an interesting one. I was watching Theo Pathitis on TV and he had swung from the Tories to Labour ahead of the election and was talking about the impact of the Employer NI and you could tell that he was very carefully choosing his words as he knew how hard this was going to be on business and what the implications are but clearly didn't want to be left with egg on his face as he was telling everyone to vote Labour ahead of the election.   Labour were, understandably, happy to right the massive wave of Tory discontent and pre-election all of the world's ills were down to the Tories. The first speech Starmer gave after winning spoke nothing about the previous government but everything about global challenges that were going to make it tough. The challenge for Labour is they convinced people that every problem was down to the Tories and that removing them would solve everything but things are not as straight forward as that. I senses things changing when they announced the 22bn blackhole and many people said...but 9bn of that are based on decisions you made in relation to public sector pay rises. Labour are finding out, to their cost, that being in opposition is easy. Being in power is not.          
    • Adsl over copper is not obsolete, these are lines that are fed on exchange only and are still being installed now and will be for foreseeable, they are being changed to sotap which is basically no dial tone and will be voice over internet 
    • Russia is the aggressor.they did have a second rate army most of it gone.why is putin so deluded .in that Russia can use chinese  Iranian  north Korean missiles drones to attack unkraine civilians city's energy facilties.they have escalated the war  by using north Korean soldiers in combat.but putting saids you are not allowed to fight back using other country's weapons in Russia long range missiles.unkraine have proved they are no push over.give them all the long range missiles they want to hit in side Russia hard .
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...