Jump to content

Recommended Posts

DuncanW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Houses in Ulverscroft don't have enough

> space out front for a bike locker and we could

> barely get in and out of the house.

>

> So I would have gladly welcomed one of these when

> we lived there. And I would have been ever so

> careful not make too much noise opening and

> closing it



Yes exactly.

Burbage Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What about six?


I'm guessing of course... but yes it sounds feasible that out of the six cyclists who use the locker, one of them might decide to ditch the car. Which is good, of course. I'm just saying that it doesn't automatically equate to "a gain in parking provision".

Jeremy,


Of course you are right that nothing would be guaranteed or automatic. But it wouldn't only require someone to ditch an existing car for this to lead to an improved parking scenario over time, one or more of the 6 could decide against getting a first or second car that they otherwise would have, because of the convenient cycle parking.


In general I admit I would likely feel imposed upon if this were erected outside my property. But objectively arguments about any material impact on house prices or noise over and above what is already made by motor vehicles seem far fetched.

How noisy are bikes these days??



Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just based on my opinion and that of my neighbour

> - not so much the appearance of it but what I

> think is the inevitable noise disturbance which

> I'd expect a potential buyer to factor into their

> property valuation. Maybe give estate agent a

> ring, if you're concerned, for their view.

>

> I think if it was uncovered like you see with

> motorbike parking then okay not a huge deal, just

> an eyesore, but does it look like a contraption

> that isn't going to be a noise problem

> occasionally late at night or in early morning

> when someone accidently or lazily bangs it shut?

If anyone wants to request one on their street, have a read of this:


http://southwarkcyclists.org.uk/cycle-parking-guide/


I've attached the CGS helpsheet so you know who to contact to request one too :-)


Foxy and Mathew123 need to stop King Canuting, you have no power over this tide.

I'd be happy to have one on our street. As an occasional cyclist the actual storage of my bike is a key factor in restricting my use, dragging it through the house from its home in the back garden..

Surely the thing could look a bit more stylish though? From the picture it looks awful. Is there scope for a design competition in the Borough or something around a standard frame?


I remember when the recycle bins came in there were a few voices worrying about the colour and no one really addressed it - now the whole Borough is covered with bright blue bins which ain't pretty. If we're going to have lots of these, which seems inevitable in the long run, at least we should try to make them look good.

This should fit in on Goose Green..

Would solve all East Dulwich Parking Probs..

Create revenue and plenty of space for cycles too.


.. And near the station. and all the shops and restaurants..


http://www.graysshoppingcentre.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/car-park.jpg


Foxy Solving problems..

Atticus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DF, you habitually go after people and habitually

> get disproved. I'm no saint on this forum but your

> raison d'?tre here appears to be one of

> outsmarting, one which perpetually fails.


You are talking Bo**ox..


This is MY thread. I raised it on behalf of a neighbour who does not post here to get feedback on bicycle hangers.

I had not previously heard of the scheme and it would seem very few people I have personally spoken to have not

heard of the scheme or had letters through their doors to seek approval or disapproval.


If you are having trouble with someone adding a bit of humour from time to time, you are in the wrong place.


I find it sad that you need to join 'The Mob' in a vague attempt to appear popular..

..without adding anything positive yourself


DulwichFox

The mistake people here make is that they think / believe EDF categorically represents East Dulwich

and the views of the residents East Dulwich.. Well it doesn't.


It represents the views of a very small proportion of the residents East Dulwich..

..and the views of some that no longer live here. Tessa Jowell syndrome.


There are many people that have never heard of EDF, some that have but do not post here.


They have their say too..


DulwichFox

Yes correct DulwichFox, there are about 35,000 people living in East Dulwich, and so far only a handful of people have shown support for bike sheds on their doorstep but it is somehow assumed that the rest of us are doing cartwheels over the idea of these pieces of metal junk lining our streets. Would it not be better to plant a tree at each of these proposed sites?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello! I would be keen to hear from parents of secondary-school age in state schools of the cost of school trips overseas. Particularly interested in Kingsdale and Charter but all examples welcome. many thanks!
    • Or the government have it wrong. Certainly picking a fight with farmers, the very definition of working people, is probably not going to end well. The problem here is that Labour hung their hat on not taxing "working people" which was clearly the output of some awful focus group and clearly not the term they wanted to use. They failed to properly qualify what a working person is and it is now coming back to haunt them because the very definition of a working person is anyone who is, well, working and that covers a whole gamut of people and salaries. Don't pick a fight with farmers if you have stated you aren't going after working people because public opinion will be against you. Farmers are the backbone of any country and work so hard and yes, there are some that are incredibly well off but the majority are not and farming is a trade that gets handed down through the generations. And farmers will make their case very public in ways other groups won't.   Labour's communication has been awful but they got a free pass before the election because everyone was so focused on how awful the Tories were. But now they are in power and they are tripping themselves up because in leadership you need more than soundbites.   The "Son of a Toolmaker" is the type of thing that haunts politicians until the end of their career. Clearly someone decided to detach Keir from his grammar school, university (including Oxford), legal career, knight of the realm background. His face when everyone laughed when he mentioned it during one of the pre-election debates was a picture. He is the son of a toolmaker but you look a bit silly when people then say yes but your dad ran a tool-making company...   Coming into power on a ticket of "look how they have been behaving" and then behaving in many ways the Tories were has been a disaster for politicians of all parties. The clothing funding and access to no.10 was just a nightmare for them and in these days where today's newspaper is no longer tomorrow's chip paper the comments made about Trump (which I am sure most people can agree with) are just embarrassing.   Winter Fuel Tax has been a disaster. Yes, there are many pensioners who don't need it but those aren't going to be the ones talking to the media about how awful the winter is going to be and people only remember those shouting the loudest.   The budget was an interesting one. I was watching Theo Pathitis on TV and he had swung from the Tories to Labour ahead of the election and was talking about the impact of the Employer NI and you could tell that he was very carefully choosing his words as he knew how hard this was going to be on business and what the implications are but clearly didn't want to be left with egg on his face as he was telling everyone to vote Labour ahead of the election.   Labour were, understandably, happy to right the massive wave of Tory discontent and pre-election all of the world's ills were down to the Tories. The first speech Starmer gave after winning spoke nothing about the previous government but everything about global challenges that were going to make it tough. The challenge for Labour is they convinced people that every problem was down to the Tories and that removing them would solve everything but things are not as straight forward as that. I senses things changing when they announced the 22bn blackhole and many people said...but 9bn of that are based on decisions you made in relation to public sector pay rises. Labour are finding out, to their cost, that being in opposition is easy. Being in power is not.          
    • Adsl over copper is not obsolete, these are lines that are fed on exchange only and are still being installed now and will be for foreseeable, they are being changed to sotap which is basically no dial tone and will be voice over internet 
    • Russia is the aggressor.they did have a second rate army most of it gone.why is putin so deluded .in that Russia can use chinese  Iranian  north Korean missiles drones to attack unkraine civilians city's energy facilties.they have escalated the war  by using north Korean soldiers in combat.but putting saids you are not allowed to fight back using other country's weapons in Russia long range missiles.unkraine have proved they are no push over.give them all the long range missiles they want to hit in side Russia hard .
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...