Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A Neighbour of mine on Ulverscroft Rd. has told me he has received notice of Parking Restrictions

and that parts of Ulverscroft will be dedicated to Bicycle bays.. with an option to raise any objection.


I have not received any such notification and wondered if anyone else had. ??


It does not seem plausible..


DulwichFox

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/56004-parking-for-bicycles/
Share on other sites

I have more details now..


Yes it is a Cycle Hanger...


The copy I have is a copy of a copy and is not clear but it looks like it will be

located outside 50/52 ?? Ulverscroft Rd.


Evidently the hanger has been requested by a local resident and will house 6 bicycles.

The spaces will be available to rent for 'a small fee' ? First come first serve .


I cant see why anyone would want to park their bicycle in a back street residential road

so far away from the station. Perhaps I'm missing something.


Why haven't all residents been informed about this scheme. ?


DulwichFox

We also received a document from Southwark council on Saturday, saying that there is a proposal for a cycle hangar to be installed in our road in Nunhead, almost outside our house, with the consequent loss of a parking space. The document refers to the council website for more information, but I can't find any further information about it there. If anyone can let me have more details, I would be very grateful.


Thanks,


Cathy

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There was discussion about this scheme on the

> forum about a year ago.

>

> I think it's a great idea. I will deffo get and

ride a bike if I have somewhere to keep it which

doesn't involve climbing over it every time I open

my front door :)


Well Sue.. Do it. The Bicycle Hanger is planned for outside 52 . Not that far from you..

Six places available First come first serve for a small fee.


I don't know what that fee would be. Perhaps just ?2.00 per day ?? ?60.00 per month . ??

I'm just guessing.


So go for it.. get rid of your car . get fit and save money and the Planet.


Foxy.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > There was discussion about this scheme on the

> > forum about a year ago.

> >

> > I think it's a great idea. I will deffo get and

> ride a bike if I have somewhere to keep it which

> doesn't involve climbing over it every time I

> open

> my front door :)

>

> Well Sue.. Do it. The Bicycle Hanger is planned

> for outside 52 . Not that far from you..

> Six places available First come first serve for a

> small fee.

>

> I don't know what that fee would be. Perhaps just

> ?2.00 per day ?? ?60.00 per month . ??

> I'm just guessing.

>

> So go for it.. get rid of your car . get fit and

> save money and the Planet.

>



I reserved a place last year :)


The fee is very much less than you guess :)


ETA: I was told (by the people who install the hangars) that the rental is ?30 a year. It may have gone up now though.

  • 2 weeks later...

I'm not surprised some residents have not received a questionnaire on their views when it has so much potential to cause noise disturbance during sleeping hours as people come and go faffing around locking/unlocking their bike, and then occasionally let it slam shut. Bang. Hello graffiti. Bad idea. Devalues properties in immediate area.


This is what it looks like. I'm opposing it.


 

Just based on my opinion and that of my neighbour - not so much the appearance of it but what I think is the inevitable noise disturbance which I'd expect a potential buyer to factor into their property valuation. Maybe give estate agent a ring, if you're concerned, for their view.


I think if it was uncovered like you see with motorbike parking then okay not a huge deal, just an eyesore, but does it look like a contraption that isn't going to be a noise problem occasionally late at night or in early morning when someone accidently or lazily bangs it shut?

If that really is what is intended then what a stupid-looking, half-baked, ramshackle affair it is.


Like a failed chicken coop circa 1941 or a something knocked up by a local school caretaker; "Yer, gimme some chicken wire and a bit of corrugated iron and wallop. Call it a tenner a pop?".


Surely there are more stylish (or just less shitty looking) alternatives?

I did initially think they would look much better with a bit of planting around them to disguise the prosiac design. But they've obviously been designed to be quickly installed insitu, and removed if required. Maybe if they are a success, some permanent greenscaping can be added to integrate them more...

Not as ugly as oil spills, air pollution, emphysema and asthma.


Re: loss of parking, they fit 5 bikes in one car space, so it?s a gain in parking provision, not a loss, unless you don?t consider cyclists as legitimate road users/tax payers/people with a right to have their needs catered for too.

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not as ugly as oil spills, air pollution,

> emphysema and asthma.

>

> Re: loss of parking, they fit 5 bikes in one car

> space, so it?s a gain in parking provision, not a

> loss, unless you don?t consider cyclists as

legitimate road users/tax payers/people with a

> right to have their needs catered for too.



They don't pay Road Tax ..


If you have a bike keep it indoors.. No place.. ??? Live Up Stairs ??

What about buggies ?? Same problem..

So are we going to have Buggy Hangers ???

When we lived in flats back in the 50's - 70's there used to be purpose built Pram /Cycle Sheds.


This is just another attack on the Motorist

Anyone wishing to have one outside their house should NOT then also own a car which they then park

outside someone else's house.


DulwichFox

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

"Not as ugly as oil spills, air pollution, emphysema and asthma. "


..and not as ugly as planting a new tree or a bed of roses in those proposed bike shed spots


"unless you don?t consider cyclists as legitimate road users/tax payers/people with a right to have their needs catered for too."


What about the rights of people wanting to use the bus - what about the ridiculous idea of a bus stop on every street?


"Bikes run on fat and save you money, cars cost you money and make you fat"


Cyclists will lose even more fat if they have a 10 minute walk to bike lockers at Peckham Common or East Dulwich train station :-)

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They don't pay Road Tax ..

>

> If you have a bike keep it indoors.. No place..

> ??? Live Up Stairs ??

> What about buggies ?? Same problem..

> So are we going to have Buggy Hangers ???

> When we lived in flats back in the 50's - 70's

> there used to be purpose built Pram /Cycle Sheds.

>

>

> This is just another attack on the Motorist

> Anyone wishing to have one outside their house

> should NOT then also own a car which they then

> park

> outside someone else's house.

>

> DulwichFox


No one pays road tax Foxy. It doesn't exist. In fact it hasn't for some time. I know you love a good cut&paste job so, voila:


ipayroadtax.com


"There has been no direct relationship between vehicle tax and road expenditure since 1937."


We all pay for roads. They come from general taxation.


You pay a vehicle duty because you drive a something that pollutes the air. Stop whinging.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You pay a vehicle duty because you drive a

> something that pollutes the air. Stop whinging.


This. Which is why electric vehicles are also exempt. There is no road tax.


Bike lockers waking neighbours at night? Seems unlikely that the cyclists will be habitually keeping such antisocial hours.


I agree about the loss of a parking space though. Most cyclists I know round here also own cars. Let's not pretend that one more bike on the road automatically equates to one less car.

For what it's worth, we were living in Ulverscroft Road up until just over a year ago. We would probably have moved sooner or later but as my wife and I both cycle to work and we have young kids (equals buggies, scooters, etc) the lack of space for bikes was absolutely the key factor that motivated us to start looking for somewhere new to live. Houses in Ulverscroft don't have enough space out front for a bike locker and we could barely get in and out of the house.


So I would have gladly welcomed one of these when we lived there. And I would have been ever so careful not make too much noise opening and closing it, just like I am with the one I have now on my own property which is more or less directly under my neighbour's window.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> They don't pay Road Tax ..

>

> If you have a bike keep it indoors.. No place..

> ??? Live Up Stairs ??

> What about buggies ?? Same problem..

> So are we going to have Buggy Hangers ???

> When we lived in flats back in the 50's - 70's

> there used to be purpose built Pram /Cycle Sheds.

>

>

> This is just another attack on the Motorist

> Anyone wishing to have one outside their house

> should NOT then also own a car which they then

> park

> outside someone else's house.

>

> DulwichFox

-----------------------------------


Ignorant uninformed tosh, on many levels....!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello! I would be keen to hear from parents of secondary-school age in state schools of the cost of school trips overseas. Particularly interested in Kingsdale and Charter but all examples welcome. many thanks!
    • Or the government have it wrong. Certainly picking a fight with farmers, the very definition of working people, is probably not going to end well. The problem here is that Labour hung their hat on not taxing "working people" which was clearly the output of some awful focus group and clearly not the term they wanted to use. They failed to properly qualify what a working person is and it is now coming back to haunt them because the very definition of a working person is anyone who is, well, working and that covers a whole gamut of people and salaries. Don't pick a fight with farmers if you have stated you aren't going after working people because public opinion will be against you. Farmers are the backbone of any country and work so hard and yes, there are some that are incredibly well off but the majority are not and farming is a trade that gets handed down through the generations. And farmers will make their case very public in ways other groups won't.   Labour's communication has been awful but they got a free pass before the election because everyone was so focused on how awful the Tories were. But now they are in power and they are tripping themselves up because in leadership you need more than soundbites.   The "Son of a Toolmaker" is the type of thing that haunts politicians until the end of their career. Clearly someone decided to detach Keir from his grammar school, university (including Oxford), legal career, knight of the realm background. His face when everyone laughed when he mentioned it during one of the pre-election debates was a picture. He is the son of a toolmaker but you look a bit silly when people then say yes but your dad ran a tool-making company...   Coming into power on a ticket of "look how they have been behaving" and then behaving in many ways the Tories were has been a disaster for politicians of all parties. The clothing funding and access to no.10 was just a nightmare for them and in these days where today's newspaper is no longer tomorrow's chip paper the comments made about Trump (which I am sure most people can agree with) are just embarrassing.   Winter Fuel Tax has been a disaster. Yes, there are many pensioners who don't need it but those aren't going to be the ones talking to the media about how awful the winter is going to be and people only remember those shouting the loudest.   The budget was an interesting one. I was watching Theo Pathitis on TV and he had swung from the Tories to Labour ahead of the election and was talking about the impact of the Employer NI and you could tell that he was very carefully choosing his words as he knew how hard this was going to be on business and what the implications are but clearly didn't want to be left with egg on his face as he was telling everyone to vote Labour ahead of the election.   Labour were, understandably, happy to right the massive wave of Tory discontent and pre-election all of the world's ills were down to the Tories. The first speech Starmer gave after winning spoke nothing about the previous government but everything about global challenges that were going to make it tough. The challenge for Labour is they convinced people that every problem was down to the Tories and that removing them would solve everything but things are not as straight forward as that. I senses things changing when they announced the 22bn blackhole and many people said...but 9bn of that are based on decisions you made in relation to public sector pay rises. Labour are finding out, to their cost, that being in opposition is easy. Being in power is not.          
    • Adsl over copper is not obsolete, these are lines that are fed on exchange only and are still being installed now and will be for foreseeable, they are being changed to sotap which is basically no dial tone and will be voice over internet 
    • Russia is the aggressor.they did have a second rate army most of it gone.why is putin so deluded .in that Russia can use chinese  Iranian  north Korean missiles drones to attack unkraine civilians city's energy facilties.they have escalated the war  by using north Korean soldiers in combat.but putting saids you are not allowed to fight back using other country's weapons in Russia long range missiles.unkraine have proved they are no push over.give them all the long range missiles they want to hit in side Russia hard .
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...