Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I found an old 'who should I vote for' questionnaire thing for the 2005 GE.


Like the mayoral one, I find these things really useful and interesting to do.

They're over-simplified, obviously (this one is aimed at people at school); but have you tried to distill key policy from the websites of the main three political parties? It's like pulling teeth. Seriously, you'd be forgiven for thinking they didn't want you know.


Anyway, here are my results on 2005 policy, honest answers all. I wonder if anything will have changed at the next GE.


file.php?20,file=3666

mockney: Invisible Ink?...How did you edit that without it saying that you did?:)


I wanted to reply before my Sierra Leonese friend arrives (don't worry she is coming from Thamesmead not Freetown!)..


p.s I AM getting confused about you being "accused" of being "affluent" though because you ain't!!


(I say you "ain't" because you refuted that by not giving me any points when I said you were, when I was Young and Judgemental..I only scored 1/5 and that was for correctly saying you receiving a decent Education!)..

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, join us.

> Vote Liberal, the party of the sanctimonious,

> hypocritical, affluent white middle class,

> ignorant, naive, hippy, la la land masses.

> Go on you know you want to!!!


NOW you are talking M8!


(Remember though you denied you were affluent or were you in such a, frankly, "indecent" haste to chastise me that you told a little porky pie...;-))


"Masses"...a small cloistered Minority by any criteria...

Sorry TLS, i realised that anger got the better of me and I waved my magic wand.


I didn't want to have to do this but:

You come from The Shires.

Nope Spain. I did school in hertforshire, but have lived all over, oop north, abroad and London for 15 years




You come from a reasonably affluent background.

NHS mother on pittance, auto didactic, working class immigrant father who worked hard and did ok. I never hungered and always had shoes, and we had a telly and stuff. Went through uni entirely on government money and personal debt. Happily consider myself middle class though. As i said, lived slightly above poverty line for 4 years in london until took even further heavy burden of debt to retrain myself and lift myself up financially speaking.


You had the benefit of a decent English education.

bingo


You, obviously, moved to the bright lights of London but have no natural affinity to the place. It "suits" for now.

Moved here many years and maintain it's the best city on earth. I will live elsewhere because I want to experience other things, and in reverse of what my father did for me, my kids will probably be better off schooled in Spain (plus it's a flip sight warmer)


You couldn't give a flying fcuk about England or, at best, you are indifferent, make that "supremely indifferent"..

I love England, nay Britain (the welsh are tops too you know, and my mum's side come from Scotland via the windies...err and germany) I love so much about this country and the people, but it's far from perfect and some things have beeen getting worse, particularly the sense of personal liberty that was a real factor in what this country stood for.

I don't even know what "supremely indefferent" means, maybe you meant ambivalent which i most certainly am, foreign adventuring for instance should have been consigned to the dustbin of our imperial past.


Happy?

Now, that election in full....

Huey, when I said:


?Does a group of people who are from the same place, have the same culture beliefs and social structure, are vulnerable to the same things and are distinct from other groups in the world not have the right to self determination??


I was not talking about going back in history to what people feel they have some hereditary right to. On that basis according to my lineage I should demand the right to vote in Britain, Ireland, Belgium, South Africa and the Netherlands*. Likewise every Jew, Christian and Muslim on the planet should get a flat in Jerusalem.


I was thinking more along the lines of a group of people who currently have significant enough common interest and mutual identification to see themselves as a distinct group or even a nation, regardless of whether they have had this historically or if it has developed over the last couple of generations. Is there space to allow them self determination in a globalised world?


It is a question I often ask because I come from a country that is home to a number of different nations rather than being a nation in itself and I currently live in a country which does the same but in a very different way.


*Whereas as it stands I can only vote in Britain, Ireland and now South Africa too apparently.


Oh and Europe too.


Which is admittedly all a bit bemusing.

I don't know anyone who posts here, as far as I'm aware, and am in no clique as far as I'm aware, but I do get annoyed by Tony's ability to make so many threads about himself. There's a neediness that manifests itself when he is disagreed with - and a consistent special pleading on his background. I know more about his life than my own, at the moment.


No doubt he'll say it's not his doing, but if he wasn't spoiling for a fight on this thread then I've got comprehension issues.


Marmora Man, I'm reasonably close to some of the output of the CSJ - some decent proposals but an awful lot of failed old Tory thinking in there as well.


I appreciate the tactical value to the C&P Tories of having one of the apparent good guys (Stranack) on their side - but the fact that he's so different from the usual Party fodder highlights a problem, doesn't it, with the Party at large?


Which opens up another discussion - should we vote for local candidates, or on a party basis?

Ted Max Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't know anyone who posts here, as far as I'm

> aware, and am in no clique as far as I'm aware,

> but I do get annoyed by Tony's ability to make so

> many threads about himself.


Agree - I'm annoyed too.



Marmora Man, I'm reasonably close to some of the output of the CSJ - some decent proposals but an awful lot of failed old Tory thinking in there as well. But it's travelling in the right (no pun intended) direction


I appreciate the tactical value to the C&P Tories of having one of the apparent good guys (Stranack)on their side - but the fact that he's so different from the usual Party fodder highlights a problem, doesn't it, with the Party at large? I suppose I should properly have described him as challenging the typical stereotype of a conservative candidate. On a personal note, having met Andy I believe he has the potential to defeat Harriet Harman through a combination of personality, knowledge and experience of inner city living and its problems, plus a genuine desire to make a difference and improve the lot of his constituents.


Which opens up another discussion - should we vote for local candidates, or on a party basis? Difficult. The "purist" answer is vote for local candidate but pragmatically there is a need to take the wider view. In practical terms only voters in swing / marginal seat have any impact on the election result and they are the ones that must consider most carefully.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You seem to have a different friend, from a

> different part of the world visiting you every

> day, Tony!


More than you realise Jeremy!


At 11.30 AM Sierra Leonese friend/cleaning Woman arriving- though she is becoming a pain-in-the-ass as I frequently tell her.

Supposed to have visited a friend last night who is 3rd Generation Janmaican/British.

The Guy who is 2nd Generation Jamaican who I walk my 4 Westies with (he has 2 of the same breed).

Jamaican Girlfriend coming back to stay from tonight to around Tuesday.

Visiting another 2nd Generation Jamaican friend who still lives in Walworth (my birthplace) next Wednesday.


Thats in the last few/next few days..


p.s It IS strange how NONE of them have noted any Racist tendencies from me though..ummm

In practical terms only voters in swing / marginal seat have any impact on the election result and they are the ones that must consider most carefully.


Cameron should go for his own version of the 50 state policy.


The actual hatred of Brown really shocks me. But I don't deny it's a real phenomenon in much of England and I really think the Tories could blow many strong Labour leads wide open at the election.


The bonus of this is that it may help them to think about the whole country, and policies for them, rather than which policies will appeal to the 5000 swithering middle-grounders in 20 "key" constituencies.


Idealist, me? Not much.

Marmora Man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Which opens up another discussion - should we vote

> for local candidates, or on a party basis?

> Difficult. The "purist" answer is vote for local

> candidate but pragmatically there is a need to

> take the wider view. In practical terms only

> voters in swing / marginal seat have any impact on

> the election result and they are the ones that

> must consider most carefully.



Perhaps MM, you will allow me to expand the remit of this debate further by asking in this age of political disillusionment, serious debate should be given to the reform of the electoral system. If only a tiny minority of the population's vote matters (i.e. those in marginal, winnable seats) and in some places turnout, even for general elections, is falling below 40% then surely a switch to a form of proportional representation is now needed?


I'll vote Labour at the next GE, not because I like Harman, or Jowell, (frankly I loathe both of them) but because I'm voting on a national level.


What does irk me though is that when I have canvassed for the Labour Party at election time, the national/local perceptions of most people are horribly skewed. At local elections, people will moan about national issues (Iraq, NHS, etc) and vote accordingly despite this being irrelevant. And yet, come the GE I hear people whinge about local issues (street lighting, council housing etc) but blame the national government rather than the local council. It is, quite frankly, infuriating.

I must say that I've generally warmed to the idea of proportional representation, despite its many pitfalls, because in my entire GE voting life not one paper through that ballot box has mattered one iota as I've had the joy of living in safe seats.


I have been known to vote pragmatically on local issues, but saldy my choices to end to be even more marginal than in the nationals

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If you're a fundraising intermediary, reporting promptly and accurately on how you've raised and spent funds seems quite important.
    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...