Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Recorded today. Loathsome Dave.

>

> https://soundcloud.com/the_e_r_c/loathsome-dave-eccentronic-research-council-ft-maxine-peake


Good lord - it's like a recording from an post-pub Occupy meeting. Close your eyes and you can almost see them all sitting around making jazz hands at the end.

And with genuine reason.


I have spent the last 3 years in a job which was basically designed to implement the Coalition cuts in my local authority. We've cut down to the bone, whilst TRYING to still help people as much as possible. And now it's going to get worse (we've already been warned) and there isn't much left to cut away. My colleague is desperately looking for another job, and I am desperately hoping she finds one so that I might be more secure because I can't see us both surviving.


So yeah, I vent my spleen a bit on facebook when I see stupid dicks who work in the NHS and vive in the burbs going on about benefits cheats and immigrants. These people are stupid as far as I'm concerned.


But if you're not at any real risk and it gives you a good giggle then great. I find that a little bit twisted though quite frankly.

Well if you're talking about particular insensitive twats then go for it but I'm talking about the whole if you don't agree with me you're a thick cunt type comments. In actual fact I wasn't referring to you as in the interest of our friendship I unfollowed you for a while! I really hope you don't lose your job, but that goes without saying x

I don't THINK I've actually called anyone thick or anything (I might have but don't think so).


I've more just said how depressing I find it and how scary. My Mrs make a turkeys voting for Christmas comment but she works in the NHS and I think that was directed at people in her work place (and I think that's fair).

Have a read of mine, I just checked and I can't see anything that could cause offence except someone else's status which I shared.


I've mainly talked about where it went wrong for Labour rather than slagging anyone off.


The wife will say what she wants to say, and she'll stand by it, and it will be a cold day in hell before she changes her mind about the Tories.


When people vote based on blatant lies they are fed by the daily mail or the sun, then I don't think it's entirely unfair to question their intelligence (and yes same for those who believe everything they read in the Guardian).

I've been watching back over the night and more especially at the opinions spouted by the Labour elite. They seem to have spent most of the campaign looking in on themselves positively whilst dismissing the bigger picture. In other words, the urban intelligentsia are on a different planet to the rest of us. A very 'London Labour' view of the UK, totally out of line with the larger view. This has to be addressed over this coming parliament.


Two important points, firstly, a divided union. Scotland doesn't believe Labour (or Westminster in general) gives them a voice. For many Scots, the translation of this at the ballot box has been to vote SNP. Whether they believe Scotland should be independent or not. The Labour and left leaning Scottish electorate, rightly or wrongly, assume the SNP to be left of Labour. They are not in my opinion, but Sturgeon has run a wonderful and convincing campaign which has supported this assumption.


Secondly, in England (and to a lesser extent Wales), the traditional Labour voter outside of London is feeling quite a bit isolated. Across the heartlands a significant enough number is turning to UKIP primarily over fears about immigration and other working class issues that they feel the wealthy Labour elite is failing to recognise or be trusted on, and this is enough to push UKIP into runner up. In the marginals, the centre-left leaning voters are believing Labour will damage the economy and are too far to the left, and so are going over to or staying with the tories as a result.


The consequences of all of this are that Labour are seen as too far to the right in Scotland, and too far to the left in England. Labour now has to confront the rise of tribalism as a consequence of the swings on the political spectrum and the makeup of the new parliament. It will be a difficult job for the new leader.


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • https://www.facebook.com/labourparty/posts/when-your-family-and-friends-ask-you-what-labour-has-achieved-so-far-send-them-t/1090481149116565/    Do you mean going from rhyming with Message to rhyming with Massage?  Or was it really a hard g to start with, rhyming, say,  with Farague/Faraig or Fararg?
    • Why on earth is there so much interest, and negativity, after a 100 days of a Labour government when we had 1000s of days of dreadful government before this with hardly a chat on this Website?  What is it that is suddenly so much greater interest? Here's part of a list of what they have done in a 100 days - it's from a Labour MP so obviously there is some bias, and mainly new Bills so yet to deliver/put into law.  This reminds me of the US election where the popular view was that Biden had achieved nothing, rather than leading the recovery after Covid, a fairer tax system, housing, supporting workers, dealing with community unrest following high profile racist incidents,  So if we think Starmer is ineffective and Labour incompetent then we are all going to believe it? I do feel sick after seeing Clarkson on Newsnight, playing to the gallery.  Surely Trump must have a high profile role for him on the environment and climate change  
    • Hi looking for a shed for my allotment. Can pick up
    • But do you not understand how tough farming is, especially post-Brexit when some of the subsidies were lost and costs have increased massively yet the prices farmers can charge has not? On the BBC News tonight they said pig farming costs had gone up 54% since 2019, cow farming costs up 44% and cereal costs up 43%. The NFU said that the margins are on average 0.5% return on capital. Land and buildings are assets that don't make money until you sell them...it's what you do with them that makes money and farms are struggling to make money and so many farms are generational family businesses so never realise the assets (one farmers on the news said his farm had been in the family since 1822) but will have to to pay tax for continuing the family business. On another news item tonight there was a short piece saying the government has said that 50,000 more pensioners will be forced into relative poverty (60% of the average income) due to the Winter Fuel Allowance removal which will rise to 100,000 more by 2027. James Murray from the Treasury was rolled out on Newsnight to try and defend that and couldn't. You can't give doctors 20%+ and push more pensioners into poverty as a result.  The problem for Labour is the court of public opinion will judge them and right now the jury is out after a series of own-goals, really poor communication and ill-thought-out idealogical policies. And don't ever annoy the farmers.....;-)  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...