Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Vehement?


I just pointed out that TCM and western medicines share a common base, and that TCM also has a lunatic fringe which means you shouldn't judge it as a single body of thought.


I take chinese medicines over here, but never for clinical problems. Before I take anything for an illness I like to be confident that it has a background of success in double blind trials, and that I can manage side-effects.

LRon Hubble Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Moos

>

> i am certainly not a scientolgist if that's what

> you are suggesting, even if i were it would have

> no effect on the usefulness of Homeopathy.

> Scientologist refuse to believe that any

> psychological illness's exist, something i

> strongly disagree with. (i think that was what

> your vague impression was mistaken for)


I know nothing about Scientology, but I assume you username is a nod to the Scientology founder as well as to the Telescope - and I also thought Scientologists not only do not believe in psychological illness but also do not believe in conventional medicine. But I may be taking the thread off topic...

Queen of Dulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And to those of you who say it's all in the mind:

> A homeopathic remedy is cheaper than anything the

> conventional medical establishment has to offer.


That's because it's water.


> So even if it is a placebo (and we will never know

> for sure) I'd rather take that.


You're saying you'd actually choose homeopathic remedies over medicines with proven results? Because they're cheaper??

If one person thinks homeopathy (and all other alternative medicine) is a sham and waste of money, and another person swears by homeopathy and has found great relief since using it: why is the person who thinks it is a sham so desperate to stop the person who believes in it believing in it?

dulwichdreadlocks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If one person thinks homeopathy (and all other

> alternative medicine) is a sham and waste of

> money, and another person swears by homeopathy and

> has found great relief since using it: why is the

> person who thinks it is a sham so desperate to

> stop the person who believes in it believing in

> it?


There's no problem when someone tries it as a last resort, or for a non-serious complaint. The problem comes when someone actually starts to trust unproven techniques over established medicine ... this could be extremely dangerous if the condition is serious.


As a side point, it also bothers me when tax revenue is spent on homeopathic hospitals, when the benefits are totally unproven.

I must say I find the success of homeopathy something of a mystery.


Most fans of alternative therapies generally like at least a half-decent dose of ancient mystical knowledge about their treatments.


Homeopathy is just poorly thought through pseudo science invented by a bit of a loon at a time when our knowledge of chemistry was already good enough to have seen this for the nonsense it is, even if our understanding of particle physics wasn't quite mature enough to prove it.


Agree with James about people's right to do so, if they wish to use meat blessed by the hurdy-gurdy mushroom man as a topical treatment, then by all means do, but if billions of pounds is spent on blessed hurdy-gurdy mushroom man meat I can't help but think what a ridiculous waste of resources it is, and if the NHS open a state of the art hurdy-gurdy mushroom man treament centre, I feel I have a pretty good right to complain about it.

Hi dulwichdreadlocks,


dulwichdreadlocks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If one person thinks homeopathy (and all other

> alternative medicine) is a sham and waste of

> money, and another person swears by homeopathy and

> has found great relief since using it: why is the

> person who thinks it is a sham so desperate to

> stop the person who believes in it believing in

> it?




Thats drawing a bit of a false dichotomy of the subject. On the one hand you have people who know Homeopathy offers no effective treatment, on the other hand you have people who believe it works. In the middle there are people who are unaware there is even any issue about homeopathic treatment and therefore don't question it.


All these people vote..... and as jeremy points out when the public's money is spend on treatments that are effectively water.....thats a problem. As that money may well have been directed away from a worth while cause.


The more who know just how credulous homeopathy assumes people are the better and the more it shall be sidelined for worthwhile treatments.


its not desperation its concern.


LRon

LRon Hubble Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi dulwichdreadlocks,

>

> dulwichdreadlocks Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > If one person thinks homeopathy (and all other

> > alternative medicine) is a sham and waste of

> > money, and another person swears by homeopathy

> and

> > has found great relief since using it: why is

> the

> > person who thinks it is a sham so desperate to

> > stop the person who believes in it believing in

> > it?

>

>

>

> Thats drawing a bit of a false dichotomy of the

> subject. On the one hand you have people who know

> Homeopathy offers no effective treatment, on the

> other hand you have people who believe it works.

> In the middle there are people who are unaware

> there is even any issue about homeopathic

> treatment and therefore don't question it.

>

> All these people vote..... and as jeremy points

> out when the public's money is spend on treatments

> that are effectively water.....thats a problem. As

> that money may well have been directed away from a

> worth while cause.

>

> The more who know just how credulous homeopathy

> assumes people are the better and the more it

> shall be sidelined for worthwhile treatments.

>

> its not desperation its concern.

>

> LRon



So we have 100% confirmation that Homeopathy NEVER works for anybody? That is news to me and clearly news to the NHS as well.

Pharmaceuticals fund most research and trials and not much room for more natural and simplistic remedies, especially if we could grow them in our gardens.I think its about what you believe in though it seriously puzzles me how many people seem to have faith in the pharmy comps, http://www.natural-health-information-centre.com/codex-alimentarius.html

antijen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Pharmaceuticals fund most research and trials and

> not much room for more natural and simplistic

> remedies, especially if we could grow them in our

> gardens.I think its about what you believe in

> though it seriously puzzles me how many people

> seem to have faith in the pharmy comps,

>

>

>


Yes I agree with you.


It is confusing and shocking to me that so many people are so up in arms about homeopathy. IF they don't like homeopathy they are free not to use it.

> http://www.natural-health-information-centre.com/c

> odex-alimentarius.html

dulwichdreadlocks


> It is confusing and shocking to me that so many people

> are so up in arms about homeopathy. IF they don't like

> homeopathy they are free not to use it.

>

>


I already explained this, its about educating people who don't know that Homeopathy is pure placebo. If you already take them and you don't have the depth of character to contemplate that you might be wrong and do some research the subject... then fine carry on taking them...put them in whatever hole you like, they have the same effect or why not give the money you are going to spend on it to charity? see if that also makes you feel better.


i am honestly shocked that people can be so fooled into taking it, Homeopathy mocks you... it is a sugar pill.... its water there are no active ingredients.


LRon

LRon Hubble Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> dulwichdreadlocks

>

> > It is confusing and shocking to me that so many

> people

> > are so up in arms about homeopathy. IF they

> don't like

> > homeopathy they are free not to use it.

> >

> >

>

> I already explained this, its about educating

> people who don't know that Homeopathy is pure

> placebo. If you already take them and you don't

> have the depth of character to contemplate that

> you might be wrong and do some research the

> subject... then fine carry on taking them...put

> them in whatever hole you like, they have the same

> effect or why not give the money you are going to

> spend on it to charity? see if that also makes you

> feel better.

>

> i am honestly shocked that people can be so fooled

> into taking it, Homeopathy mocks you... it is a

> sugar pill.... its water there are no active

> ingredients.

>

> LRon



You have not explained to me where you get this idea from. It is presumably just your opinion.

Mockney Piers


if your out there, i apologize i get it, no more starting Homeopathy threads for me.... preaching to the converted? i wish.


best post award goes to


AllForNun


> i think at the end of the day it must be a gene thing,

> it just something you have that makes you different. I

> don't think it is right to shun people because they are

> attracted to people of the same sex and i 'certainly' do

> not agree with trying to get them treated. Live and let live i say.




so, is Homophobia a shame....yes!


Fu*king brilliant..


LRon

Which bit is opinion DD?


From the British Homeopathic Association:


"In homeopathy the active ingredient is highly diluted. The greater the dilution, the more potent the medicine. Laboratory research is focusing on the ability of water to retain an imprint of substances which have been dissolved in it."


I think they agree with LRon don't they?


Or do you not accept their view on what homeopathy is?

dulwichdreadlocks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> You have not explained to me where you get this

> idea from. It is presumably just your opinion.



"Homeopathy is a system of medicine which is based on treating the individual with highly diluted substances given in mainly tablet form, which triggers the body?s natural system of healing.... They are diluted to such a degree that not one molecule of the original substance can be detected[/b]" Society of Homeopaths


"not one molecule of the original substance can be detected"! therefore, in layman's terms, it's a tablet that contains nothing. Except magic.


[edited once] for typos

dulwichdreadlocks


What are you asking? i clearly explained why as you say "so many people are up in arms about it". Are you now asking me why it doesn't work? this is not just my view its the view of the entire scientific community (im not exaggerating). pls look back through the thread, at my posts for links . This is really basic stuff ask your G.P. for his honest medical opinion.


or just google.... "why homeopathy does not work" don't take my word for it.


LRon

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...