Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Judging by your many comments on the Forum, it seems that problems with post in ED are growing. Regrettably, instead of acknowledging the problem, Royal Mail make it as difficult as possible for us to get redress. Getting in touch by phone takes at least half an hour of hanging around, with them promising to get in touch within X amount of days. My experience is that you often have to waste a further half an hour chasing them up because they haven't got back as promised. If you are "lucky", you might get palmed off with a book of 1st class stamps as compensation or you may be fobbed off with a very sincere-sounding assurance that the problem has been passed on to ED sorting office and that everything should be hunky dory from now on. Or, you may be ignored, or - at worst - you will merely be told that there doesn't appear to be any particular problem with ED. Complaining by letter is not much better, as RM often state that they didn't receive your complaint (enough said!). And as for their web-site...whilst it IS possible to contact them via a very circuituous route - the process is not made easy.


I now have an email address for those of you who wish to vent your frustrations about our postal "service". It is:


[email protected].


Ensure you head your email "COMPLAINT", because then they HAVE to deal with it under the terms of their own complaints procedure knowing that failure to do so may give the customer the right to instead use the Ombudsman-style service (most ombudsman services will not get involved unless it can be shown that a company's own complaints procedure has been exhausted).


As alluded to above, RM insist that there isn't an issue with our postal service. However, a member of RM's Customer Services recently advised me to contact them EVERY time a problem arises - no matter how small. That way, she said, RM can build up a picture of any problem and take "appropriate action" against ED sorting office. So, get complaining - and let the Forum know how you get on. The more evident the problem on the forum, the more ammunition/evidence we all have when the day comes to utilising the Ombudsman-type service. We DO have the power to change things for the better.

I have had numerous battles with Royal Mail in London.


Contacting Royal Mail by telephone is a disaster. The only way you will manage to get something done is if you telephone Royal Mail Head Office and ask for the Chairman or Adam Crozier's office. I have found staff in this department to be very helpful and get results.

You are advised they will respond within 5 working days - I'll shall report back later ;-)


I wrote a wonderful letter of complaint and bemusement of how a clearly presented letter with a destination of another London address ended up arriving at a Liverpool address... such a kind person who returned the important letter back...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Wow  So many armchair accident investigators putting forward their theorys. My thoughts are that we should wait for an official investigation to tell us what actually happened. 
    • Chester is a large ginger and while cat with a fluffy tail. He went missing from Casino Avenue on April 8. We only recently adopted him from Battersea, so he may be a bit disorientated. Please check any sheds or garages in case he's got trapped - he's not the cleverest cat. If you spot him please contact 07905 209 508. He does have a microchip.
    • Hi. Have you managed to find any groups in the area? I'm also a woman with ADHD and looking for support/discussion ideally locally.
    • Went to the junction today to check the "scene of the event" to try and work out from the tyre marks on the road and the damage to the kerb, what were the contributing factors to the accident. Here are my observations and deductions. 1.Compaction type refuse collection trucks, such as these, are exceptionally "tail-heavy" due the the weight of the hydraulic compaction mechanism and the fact that this weight is positioned on the  rear overhang ie behind the rear wheels. 2. To compensate for the extra weight, the truck is fitted with a "tag axle". The tag axle is located  forward of the rearmost axle. When fully laden, all the rear tyres will be running at very close to their operating limit. 3. The tag axle has only 2 wheels as opposed to 4 wheels on the rearmost axle. So on either side at the rear, there a three wheels. So if one rear tyre on the near side has lost pressure,  the weight carried by the remaining two is increased by 50%. 4. Being tail-heavy with a high centre of gravity, the driver of such vehicles should be ultra cautious when cornering. 5. When turning to the right,  the weight imposed on near side tyres is further increased depending on the speed involved. 6. The two long curved tyre marks on the road  suggest that only two of the 3 tyres on the near side were taking the weight.  7 These curved tyre marks end abruptly and I'm trying to work out exactly why. This spot is  very close to where the  near side rear wheels  slide up against the kerb and the wheel rims gouge out chunks  of the kerb stones. There is a possibility that the driver braked late and so caused the tyres to loose all grip and so slide into the kerb. If there are any forensic traffic experts around, I would welcome their take on this.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...