Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> These companies rarely buy the property

> themselves, they're essentially an agency/broker

> for cash investors.

>

> Without doubt unscrupulous. But I find it hard to

> muster sympathy for people daft enough to fall for

> it.


People sometimes need to move house quickly (ill-health, new job). They fall for a sales patter, and, to be fair to those people, the companies involved are quite devious and persuasive - claiming to be endorsed by celebrities, charities and that they're regulated by the Property Ombudsman (who have no legal powers).


As you say, completely unscrupulous. But, unfortunately, perfectly legal. What is needed - and should have happened years ago - was for them to be regulated somehow.

Surely it is only a small number of highly vulnerable individuals who don't have the ability to figure out for themselves what their house is really worth (or have people who can help them with this). Of course I have sympathy for these people. But if it's simply a question of falling for sales patter (or worse still, celebrity endorsements) then I have very little...

Agree, but where do you draw the line?


Thetrainline.com (more expensive than booking via train companies, yet ASA turn a blind eye to their fraudulent claims)


Mobile phone companies (who effectively charge an extortionate rate of interest if you get a smartphone directly from them as part of a package)


Insurance companies racking up renewal rates and associated charges for loyal customers (nearly always cheaper to renew as a new customer)


The list goes on

Lowlander Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Thetrainline.com (more expensive than booking via train companies, yet ASA turn a blind eye to their

> fraudulent claims)


Really? Apart from adding the ?1 fee, I've not seen any difference between TTL and train companies prices. Have I missed something?

Ex-council houses sold off at massive discount to people who then struggle to keep up repayments. Sell it on to one of these sharks, again for less then market value and suddenly it's part of someone's property portfolio. They rent it back to someone who would previously been renting from the council at full market rates and taxpayer picks up the housing benefit bill. Everybody gets shafted, except the 'buy to letter', who get's a lovely big subsidy from the state and claims it's free market capitalism in practice.
Greed is good and profit before people and all that. The government today sold it's 40% stake in Eurostar (a profittable business btw) to the French and Canadians. And we wonder why we have poor tax receipts and our economy is nose diving? Why don't we have the power to stop a government, that never had a public mandate to govern, from selling of what little is left to foreign shareholders?

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lowlander Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Thetrainline.com (more expensive than booking

> via train companies, yet ASA turn a blind eye to

> their

> > fraudulent claims)

>

> Really? Apart from adding the ?1 fee, I've not

> seen any difference between TTL and train

> companies prices. Have I missed something?


Trainline charge credit card fees, postage fees and booking fees.


Booking direct avoids those (and you can buy tickets for any train company from any train company).


East Coast used to offer 10% discount but now give Nectar points instead.


Southern offer a no quibble refund on unused tickets (others charge at least ?10).


Telegraph found that booking direct saves around ?10 on average http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/markets/11333215/Can-Trainline-be-more-than-a-railway-middleman.html

Lowlander Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Lowlander Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> >

> > > Thetrainline.com (more expensive than booking

> > via train companies, yet ASA turn a blind eye

> to

> > their

> > > fraudulent claims)

> >

> > Really? Apart from adding the ?1 fee, I've not

> > seen any difference between TTL and train

> > companies prices. Have I missed something?

>

> Trainline charge credit card fees, postage fees

> and booking fees.

>

> Booking direct avoids those (and you can buy

> tickets for any train company from any train

> company).

>

> East Coast used to offer 10% discount but now give

> Nectar points instead.

>

> Southern offer a no quibble refund on unused

> tickets (others charge at least ?10).

>

> Telegraph found that booking direct saves around

> ?10 on average

> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/markets/1133321

> 5/Can-Trainline-be-more-than-a-railway-middleman.h

> tml



I've never paid more than a pound extra. I collect my tickets from a machine at the station, which is the easiest method anyway.


I'd be astonished if most train companies didn't charge to send tickets home.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ex-council houses sold off at massive discount to

> people who then struggle to keep up repayments.

> Sell it on to one of these sharks, again for less

> then market value and suddenly it's part of

> someone's property portfolio. They rent it back to

> someone who would previously been renting from the

> council at full market rates and taxpayer picks up

> the housing benefit bill. Everybody gets shafted,

> except the 'buy to letter', who get's a lovely big

> subsidy from the state and claims it's free market

> capitalism in practice.


Im not seeing any surplus value from that construct bro'

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lowlander Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Loz Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Lowlander Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > >

> > > > Thetrainline.com (more expensive than

> booking

> > > via train companies, yet ASA turn a blind eye

> > to

> > > their

> > > > fraudulent claims)

> > >

> > > Really? Apart from adding the ?1 fee, I've

> not

> > > seen any difference between TTL and train

> > > companies prices. Have I missed something?

> >

> > Trainline charge credit card fees, postage fees

> > and booking fees.

> >

> > Booking direct avoids those (and you can buy

> > tickets for any train company from any train

> > company).

> >

> > East Coast used to offer 10% discount but now

> give

> > Nectar points instead.

> >

> > Southern offer a no quibble refund on unused

> > tickets (others charge at least ?10).

> >

> > Telegraph found that booking direct saves

> around

> > ?10 on average

> >

> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/markets/1133321

>

> >

> 5/Can-Trainline-be-more-than-a-railway-middleman.h

>

> > tml

>

>

> I've never paid more than a pound extra. I collect

> my tickets from a machine at the station, which is

> the easiest method anyway.

>

> I'd be astonished if most train companies didn't

> charge to send tickets home.



None of the train companies charges a booking fee.


None of them charge for using a credit card.


Some offer a discount for booking direct (can be as much as 10%).


Some will give you a total refund on unused tickets (trainline charge ?10)


Most will post out free of charge


This means that without exception you are better off booking through any of the Train companies than the trainline (see the article).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • https://www.facebook.com/labourparty/posts/when-your-family-and-friends-ask-you-what-labour-has-achieved-so-far-send-them-t/1090481149116565/    Do you mean going from rhyming with Message to rhyming with Massage?  Or was it really a hard g to start with, rhyming, say,  with Vague?
    • Why on earth is there so much interest, and negativity, after a 100 days of a Labour government when we had 1000s of days of dreadful government before this with hardly a chat on this Website?  What is it that is suddenly so much greater interest? Here's part of a list of what they have done in a 100 days - it's from a Labour MP so obviously there is some bias, and mainly new Bills so yet to deliver/put into law.  This reminds me of the US election where the popular view was that Biden had achieved nothing, rather than leading the recovery after Covid, a fairer tax system, housing, supporting workers, dealing with community unrest following high profile racist incidents,  So if we think Starmer is ineffective and Labour incompetent then we are all going to believe it? I do feel sick after seeing Clarkson on Newsnight, playing to the gallery.  Surely Trump must have a high profile role for him on the environment and climate change  
    • Hi looking for a shed for my allotment. Can pick up
    • But do you not understand how tough farming is, especially post-Brexit when some of the subsidies were lost and costs have increased massively yet the prices farmers can charge has not? On the BBC News tonight they said pig farming costs had gone up 54% since 2019, cow farming costs up 44% and cereal costs up 43%. The NFU said that the margins are on average 0.5% return on capital. Land and buildings are assets that don't make money until you sell them...it's what you do with them that makes money and farms are struggling to make money and so many farms are generational family businesses so never realise the assets (one farmers on the news said his farm had been in the family since 1822) but will have to to pay tax for continuing the family business. On another news item tonight there was a short piece saying the government has said that 50,000 more pensioners will be forced into relative poverty (60% of the average income) due to the Winter Fuel Allowance removal which will rise to 100,000 more by 2027. James Murray from the Treasury was rolled out on Newsnight to try and defend that and couldn't. You can't give doctors 20%+ and push more pensioners into poverty as a result.  The problem for Labour is the court of public opinion will judge them and right now the jury is out after a series of own-goals, really poor communication and ill-thought-out idealogical policies. And don't ever annoy the farmers.....;-)  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...